Fire Fighters let a guy house burn down b/c of $75 fee

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 04:33 PM
  #76  
buckdropper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
From: south western NYS Latitude: 42.34 N, Longitude: 78.46 W
Originally Posted by Habibi
Bucky is "off the grid" allright,
If you think his winter house is bad, you should check out his summer place:

At least i have a summer home, not a campground fulled with infidels!!!!

Raoul & Habibi= ****.........
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 04:42 PM
  #77  
NCSU_05_FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 4
From: Lexington, KY
Originally Posted by risupercrewman
Why should any Professonal Firefighter risk his life for a cheap tax deadbeat!!! I am totally in agreement with them! Fire & Police services come with a price!!!
This brings up an interesting point, to me at least. If firefighters and police are paid services, why should an off-duty cop have any more authority than any other joe-citizen out on the street?

- NCSU
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 05:11 PM
  #78  
dirt bike dave's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Below are the annual retirement pensions paid in my city and county, which has like 15% unemployement. The original newspaper article from last month published the names, but I see no need to go there.

FWIW, we have 175 county & city retirees collecting $100,000+ per year, quite a few of whom were 'disabled' just prior to retirement, which allows their pensions to be exempt from income tax.

Don't worry, the 'deadbeat' taxpayers will be expected to cough up CPI or COLA adjustments, too. FWIW, many of these public servants retired in their 50's.

KERN COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
(fire chief): $232,547
(fire chief): $177,885
(chief deputy fire department): $168,282
(sheriff): $165,133


CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
(police chief): $160,557
(assistant police chief): $148,756
(deputy fire chief): $141,096
(deputy fire chief): $137,061
(deputy fire chief): $136,416
(police captain): $128,472
(police lieutenant): $125,631
(police chief): $125,108
(police captain): $123,915

Look, I appreciate public service, but these pension deals are just not sustainable.

Just something to keep in mind when you call 911 and they put you on hold to check your tax records before they decide if they will come out and help.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 05:32 PM
  #79  
Norm's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
From: Seabrook,NH
Protect and Serve first. Bill me later.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 05:51 PM
  #80  
NCSU_05_FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 4
From: Lexington, KY
I see a simple way for at least one city in CA to reduce their overhead by over a $1,000,000 per year.

Nobody deserves $100k+ per year of taxpayer money for doing nothing. They're lucky they don't get taken out by disgruntled, unemployed, pissed off people.

- NCSU
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 05:56 PM
  #81  
screwyou's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by dirt bike dave
Below are the annual retirement pensions paid in my city and county, which has like 15% unemployement. The original newspaper article from last month published the names, but I see no need to go there.

FWIW, we have 175 county & city retirees collecting $100,000+ per year, quite a few of whom were 'disabled' just prior to retirement, which allows their pensions to be exempt from income tax.

Don't worry, the 'deadbeat' taxpayers will be expected to cough up CPI or COLA adjustments, too. FWIW, many of these public servants retired in their 50's.

KERN COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION
(fire chief): $232,547
(fire chief): $177,885
(chief deputy fire department): $168,282
(sheriff): $165,133


CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
(police chief): $160,557
(assistant police chief): $148,756
(deputy fire chief): $141,096
(deputy fire chief): $137,061
(deputy fire chief): $136,416
(police captain): $128,472
(police lieutenant): $125,631
(police chief): $125,108
(police captain): $123,915

Look, I appreciate public service, but these pension deals are just not sustainable.

Just something to keep in mind when you call 911 and they put you on hold to check your tax records before they decide if they will come out and help.
That's why California is a s**t hole of a State. Go figure....it's run by Liberals. I don't blame these folks....it's the idiots who vote for them and their State laws.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 06:56 PM
  #82  
dirt bike dave's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Actually, my city votes conservative! Imagine how bad it is in the big liberal cities!

For a long time, the city had a '3 at 50' retirement plan. Basically, at any time after age 50, you could get 3% of your LAST salary, x the number of years you worked for the city.

So if you worked 30 years for the city and retired at age 55, you got 90% of your LAST salary (adjusted for COLA), for life. Lots of people worked only a year or two as department heads, got big raises, then retired and got retirement pay based on the department head's job.

And like I said, if you got disabled as a public safety employee, your pension is not taxable. Lots of fire and police supervisors have apparently got disabled their last 3 months at their desk jobs. But medical records are confidential...

But let the deadbeats burn, lol.

Sorry for getting off track - The public servant calling people deadbeats just stuck in my craw a few pages back. I kind of hate being reminded I'm almost 50 and will probably never retire, largely thanks to the huge tax burdens I face.
 

Last edited by dirt bike dave; Oct 7, 2010 at 07:00 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 07:33 PM
  #83  
Habibi's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 664
Likes: 1
From: Whitehorse, Yukon
Originally Posted by dirt bike dave
Actually, my city votes conservative! Imagine how bad it is in the big liberal cities!

For a long time, the city had a '3 at 50' retirement plan. Basically, at any time after age 50, you could get 3% of your LAST salary, x the number of years you worked for the city.

So if you worked 30 years for the city and retired at age 55, you got 90% of your LAST salary (adjusted for COLA), for life. Lots of people worked only a year or two as department heads, got big raises, then retired and got retirement pay based on the department head's job.

And like I said, if you got disabled as a public safety employee, your pension is not taxable. Lots of fire and police supervisors have apparently got disabled their last 3 months at their desk jobs. But medical records are confidential...

But let the deadbeats burn, lol.

Sorry for getting off track - The public servant calling people deadbeats just stuck in my craw a few pages back. I kind of hate being reminded I'm almost 50 and will probably never retire, largely thanks to the huge tax burdens I face.
Those sound like some plum pensions.
When I retired from the federal public service, they take the average of your last 6 years, and then base that amount on the number of years of service.
(overtime and extra pay doesn't count, only base salary as per the collective agreement)

So say you retired from where I worked, and you had in 25 years, and your last 6 years were:
$71,000
$68,000
$66,000
$66,000
$62,000
$57,000 they would then base your pension on the 6-year average being $65,000.
25 years x 2% a year means your entitled to a 50% pension based on $65,000 or $32,500 per year.

Those pensions you quoted Dave are pretty sweet, I know they are heads of departments, but still. In my next life I'm moving to merca, screw this Canada crap and our crappy little pensions
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 08:33 PM
  #84  
NCSU_05_FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 4
From: Lexington, KY
I think I'm going to invest in guns, ammo and books.

- NCSU
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 08:47 PM
  #85  
dirt bike dave's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Originally Posted by Habibi
Those pensions you quoted Dave are pretty sweet, I know they are heads of departments, but still. In my next life I'm moving to merca, screw this Canada crap and our crappy little pensions
You're too late. They scaled it back to 'crappy little' 2% a couple of years ago when the economy crashed. Everyone in the door before then still gets their 3%, though.

The lists I posted above were culled from the top 10 city and top 10 county retirees, so they did not show all the cops or firefighters making over $100,000. Another article showed we have five or six retired police chiefs that are each collecting $100,000+ per year in pension.

Of course the government employee unions fought tooth and nail to prevent the newspaper from getting this info.

Sorry I'm a little pissy, but I got my property tax bill yesterday.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 09:21 PM
  #86  
txarsoncop's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Texas Baby!!
Originally Posted by NCSU_05_FX4
This brings up an interesting point, to me at least. If firefighters and police are paid services, why should an off-duty cop have any more authority than any other joe-citizen out on the street?

- NCSU
NCSU, off-duty cops are expected to carry by most agencies because it, in effect, it double/triples your police force; even though they are only expected to intervene in life threatening/felony incidents.

Police officers are also in danger of running into folks they've sent to the big house who might be more than a bit resentful about that.

They also get more firearm training than a lot of the Average Joes. NOTE that I am NOT saying they have the MORE skills. For the most part they do have more training/experience in shoot/don't shoot decision making. I for one am more concerned about the decision making than the shooting skills.

Just my $.02
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 10:49 PM
  #87  
Pickup Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 1
From: Hollywood, CA
Originally Posted by txarsoncop
NCSU, off-duty cops are expected to carry by most agencies because it, in effect, it double/triples your police force; even though they are only expected to intervene in life threatening/felony incidents.

Police officers are also in danger of running into folks they've sent to the big house who might be more than a bit resentful about that.

They also get more firearm training than a lot of the Average Joes. NOTE that I am NOT saying they have the MORE skills. For the most part they do have more training/experience in shoot/don't shoot decision making. I for one am more concerned about the decision making than the shooting skills.

Just my $.02
I got no problem with that, but I do think that if they are off duty and see someone speeding then they shouldn't be able to pull them over if they're not on the clock.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2010 | 11:30 PM
  #88  
txarsoncop's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Texas Baby!!
I'm not aware of a single jurisdiction that allows that. Now an off-duty cop can report a misdemeanor they've witnessed, have on on-duty cop show up and write the ticket/make the arrest with the off-duty signing/filing as complainant; IN TEXAS. Your state laws may vary.
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 01:07 AM
  #89  
FF301's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: highlands ranch, co
back to the origanil post -

the fire fighters should have put out the fire and billed his insurance company thats how it's done in the real world

i'm a volunteer for 20 years and i'd be ashamed if i was one of them

community service does not end at the edge of town no matter how hillbilly you are
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2010 | 08:29 AM
  #90  
NCSU_05_FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 4
From: Lexington, KY
Originally Posted by txarsoncop
NCSU, off-duty cops are expected to carry by most agencies because it, in effect, it double/triples your police force; even though they are only expected to intervene in life threatening/felony incidents.

Police officers are also in danger of running into folks they've sent to the big house who might be more than a bit resentful about that.

They also get more firearm training than a lot of the Average Joes. NOTE that I am NOT saying they have the MORE skills. For the most part they do have more training/experience in shoot/don't shoot decision making. I for one am more concerned about the decision making than the shooting skills.

Just my $.02
Then shouldn't firefighters be expected to act in the same capacity? Even though this guy wasn't paid up, they turned their backs on a citizen in need. His pets died due to the firefighters inactions, and the man lost his house. I'm sure the owner might harbor a wee bit of resentment towards those firefighters.

Originally Posted by Pickup Man
I got no problem with that, but I do think that if they are off duty and see someone speeding then they shouldn't be able to pull them over if they're not on the clock.
You mean like this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHjjF55M8JQ

Notice no lights flashing on the car, no uniform on the cop, the only thing showing was his badge down by his holster.

The kicker was, the State charged the rider with felony wiretapping charges because he video tapped the cop. Charges were later dropped.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzYuhwmcOBc

- NCSU
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 PM.