Ford- 1 BILLION profit third quarter!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 09:53 AM
  #1  
Labnerd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 42
From: So. Texas
Ford- 1 BILLION profit third quarter!!!

Now yer talkin!! Ford has closed the 3rd quarter with a ONE BILLION dollar profit! Now that's the good news we need to hear about our favorite team.

Ford, the only Detroit automaker to dodge direct government aid and bankruptcy court, surprised investors with net income of nearly $1 billion in the third quarter and forecast a "solidly profitable" 2011.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33583171/ns/business-autos
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 10:00 AM
  #2  
FX41's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 2
From: Bronco Country
Thats sweet!!!
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 10:13 AM
  #3  
jk007's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: Metro Detroit
This is great news for Ford, way to go guys. But, they have now given the UAW more ammunition to not accept concessions...

http://michiganmessenger.com/29245/u...ct-concessions

Ford was trying to get the negotiations wrapped up before their 3rd Quarter earnings release. Well now that cat is out of the bag so to speak, I think they are going to have much more difficult time coming to some agreement. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #4  
harleydude78's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Crestview, FL
dont forget cash for clunkers was in the 3rd quarter, so some of this might be smoke and mirrors. 4th quarter will probable not be great.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #5  
s2krn's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Let the moaning and whining from the UAW begin. I'm sure they will now want higher pay and better benefits. The Auto Unions are now Obama nut huggers and will do whatever it takes to have Ford go the way of GM.

Hopefully Ford will be able to prevail and continue to be a profitable and PRIVATELY held American company!
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 04:55 PM
  #6  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
Awesome to hear. Don't let Obama find out though. He may ask to borrow .
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 05:04 PM
  #7  
Klitch's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 5
From: Washington
i just read an article in the paper when i was on break at work, they're having problems with the UAW, so im sure that will be costing them more down the road.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 05:07 PM
  #8  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 158
From: DFW
woot
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 05:39 PM
  #9  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 158
From: DFW
I like this one too
http://editorial.autos.msn.com/artic...1101555#atoolb

Ford has consolidated its position as the only Detroit automaker with world-class reliability. Of the 51 Ford, Mercury, and Lincoln products that we surveyed, 46 — or about 90 percent — are average or better, including the new Ford Flex SUV.

GM shed the Hummer, Pontiac, and Saturn brands after emerging from bankruptcy. It now consists of Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC. Of the 48 models we surveyed from those brands, 20 have average scores, and only the Malibu v6 sedan is better than average.

Some newer GM products are bright spots. In addition to the Malibu, the Buick Lucerne did well in our road tests, and it scores average in reliability. The Chevrolet Traverse SUV also makes the cut, as does its cousin, the Buick Enclave, but only in the all-wheel-drive version. The Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra 1500 pickups, two good performers, earn our recommendation as well. GM has a number of strong contenders either just released or in the pipeline, but they are too new for us to have reliability data on them.

As for Chrysler, we couldn't recommend any of its products in last year's survey because of mediocre performance, poor reliability, or both. Now we can recommend one: the four-wheel-drive version of the redesigned Dodge Ram 1500 pickup. It did well in our road tests and rates average in reliability. Still, more than one-third of Chrysler products are much worse than average, including its new car-based SUV, the Dodge Journey.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 08:05 AM
  #10  
Super FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by Klitch
i just read an article in the paper when i was on break at work, they're having problems with the UAW, so im sure that will be costing them more down the road.
If the UAW does not accept some wage cuts, Ford is moving the plant down to Mexico. They have been working on that for a long time now.

Even though Ford released 1 billion in earnings, that is not quite 'actual earnings'. Some of it is from Cash for Clunkers, and some is from cutting some costs here and there. I'm happy to see them making better numbers but it's not quite the whole truth.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 09:20 AM
  #11  
f150fella08's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburg, Texas
Originally Posted by JBMX928
Awesome to hear. Don't let Obama find out though. He may ask to borrow .
no he'll just give it to the people on welfare, that or "give" the people on welfare all new fords

something like, i want all automakers to be equal, so in turn since GM and chrysler dont sell worth a crap, ford must give away cars and trucks to those in need.

i'm in "NEED" of a harley f450
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 05:51 PM
  #12  
BHibbs's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Strange... I thought it was "Impossible" for a US Automobile Manufacturer to make ANY profit because they had to pay their Labor 900 Dollars/Hour..

 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 07:10 PM
  #13  
screwbuilder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Originally Posted by Super FX4
If the UAW does not accept some wage cuts, Ford is moving the plant down to Mexico. They have been working on that for a long time now.

Even though Ford released 1 billion in earnings, that is not quite 'actual earnings'. Some of it is from Cash for Clunkers, and some is from cutting some costs here and there. I'm happy to see them making better numbers but it's not quite the whole truth.
Just curious, which plant is it that they will move to Mexico??

So an increase in sales and a reduction in expenses (some due to concessions from the union in March including wage cuts) do not count on the bottom line?? Where is this type of accounting taught??? Weird stuff.
Please enlighten us with "the whole truth".
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 08:36 PM
  #14  
Super FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by screwbuilder
Just curious, which plant is it that they will move to Mexico??

So an increase in sales and a reduction in expenses (some due to concessions from the union in March including wage cuts) do not count on the bottom line?? Where is this type of accounting taught??? Weird stuff.
Please enlighten us with "the whole truth".
I have some financial reports from my broker that were sent to me since I own Ford shares, it is about one of the taurus plants. It has been in the works for actually over a year now, just very slow. But rightfully so, no need to rush a plant movement especially in an unsure economy like this one.

Did the concessions help from the Union, yes... it helped their balances a little more.

Many people take the media's word at 100% truth, the media is making it sound that the Billion in earnings was due to increased sales alone. Not all of the money earned it from 'just' sales. It is idiocy to listen to the media for financial advice/info.

Ford still has some debts and they are running on a lot of credit as well.
 

Last edited by Super FX4; Nov 3, 2009 at 08:44 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 08:44 PM
  #15  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
In perspective... That's less than 10% of the loss they had in the 4th quarter of last year. And in a quarter with the advantage of Cash for Clunkers and inventory replenishment being in effect... I guess it's better than a loss, but many 4th quarter sales were probably moved up to take advantage of the government hand out. I wouldn't get too excited yet.
 

Last edited by Odin's Wrath; Nov 3, 2009 at 09:01 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 AM.