Whatever You Say, Mr. President !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 12:30 AM
  #61  
Frank S's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Originally Posted by JackandJanet
All you have to do to spread panic is to say: "radiation"!

I can see people diving under tables right now! Yellowcake cannot be made into a "dirty bomb" - read the quote! And, Frank, I acknowledged that it COULD be refined into usable uranium, didn't I? Did we find any capability in Iraq to perform this task?

Tenet told Bush what Bush wanted to hear. Bush needed an excuse. Rational minds, like Colin Powell, were telling him to proceed carefully, but he didn't listen and managed to get the CIA to construct a pretense that justified an invasion.

You're not even in the game.

- Jack
Tenet did not tell Bush what he wanted to hear.

I would suggest you read Tenet's own book, "At The Center of the Storm."

Then when you're done with that read, "War and Decision" by Douglas Feith. He exposes a few of Tenets' lies.

Even John Bolton shows Colin Powell and the mistakes he made. Colin Powell left plenty of wiggle-room politically so that he could look good if things went well in Iraq, but dis-connect himself if things went wrong.
 

Last edited by Frank S; Sep 22, 2009 at 12:33 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 12:34 AM
  #62  
JackandJanet's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,887
Likes: 61
From: Among javelinas and scorpions in Zoniestan
Originally Posted by Frank S
Your post is half true, half false. There are many "career employees" at Foggy Bottom and at the CIA. These people are liberal democrats that color their reports with their political leanings.

This is covered in-depth in, "Sabotage: Americas' Enemies Within The CIA", "Surrender Is Not An Option", "At The Center Of The Storm", and also, "The Politics of Diplomacy."

Remember, an administrations' policy is colored by his advisors AND the reports they get from the CIA and State.
Really! All of them? Gosh! The durned Republicans must be total incompetents then. Can't even get one of their own inside those secret walls.

Don't suppose the authors of those books you cite are "right-wing leaning" are they? Believe EVERYTHING you read?

- Jack
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 12:36 AM
  #63  
Frank S's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Originally Posted by JackandJanet
Really! All of them? Gosh! The durned Republicans must be total incompetents then. Can't even get one of their own inside those secret walls.

Don't suppose the authors of those books you cite are "right-wing leaning" are they? Believe EVERYTHING you read?

- Jack
With your logic everything written by Democrats is true, but you don't see that.

Don't believe your getting the full story from the evening news.

When several different authors have documented facts, and George Tenet has NO FOOTNOTES whatsoever in his book, you gotta lean to the ones with de-classified notes and memos.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 12:38 AM
  #64  
Frank S's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Originally Posted by JackandJanet
Really! All of them? Gosh! The durned Republicans must be total incompetents then. Can't even get one of their own inside those secret walls.

Don't suppose the authors of those books you cite are "right-wing leaning" are they? Believe EVERYTHING you read?

- Jack
Didn't say all of them in my post. It is common knowledge in political circles that a Republican president has to beware of Foggy Bottom.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 07:23 AM
  #65  
Super FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by JackandJanet
This is a joke, right?

You can't honestly believe what you just said here.

- Jack
If you would read the books, it would tell you why. But who wants to read a book right? Thats only for nerds.

What do you believe a WMD is? Do you think chemical rockets that were used to kill 200,000 kurds 'might' be WMD's? If you would get some books to read and stop listening to keith olberman, you might learn some stuff that you never knew. All the facts say there were WMD's and many more materials for WMD's that were found. The only ones that say there were not are the ones ignorant to the facts and open minded to the liberal nightly news.
 

Last edited by Super FX4; Sep 22, 2009 at 09:42 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 09:20 AM
  #66  
FX41's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 2
From: Bronco Country
Iraq had WMDs, they were in the form of Chemical and Biological, not Nuclear so they don't count right? What you stupid libs forget is that Bush didn't invade Iraq, the UN did. But like usual the other contries fail to see an action through to the end. All the other countires bailed pretty quik with the exeption of England and some Canucks, but now they too are gone, leaving America to stay and clean up. Well we did, Iraq, although still in turmoil has a functioning government with a leader elected by they people, not some crazy dictator that gases his own people.

And Jack, Clinton got impeached bacause he broke the friggin law!!!!!! He freakin impeached himself and admitted it. Thats what you think is the republicans "stooping to the dems level" He should have been impeached. Bush did not do anything worth even thinking about impeachment. God all you libs **** me off.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2009 | 09:46 AM
  #67  
Super FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by FX41
Iraq had WMDs, they were in the form of Chemical and Biological, not Nuclear so they don't count right? What you stupid libs forget is that Bush didn't invade Iraq, the UN did. But like usual the other contries fail to see an action through to the end. All the other countires bailed pretty quik with the exeption of England and some Canucks, but now they too are gone, leaving America to stay and clean up. Well we did, Iraq, although still in turmoil has a functioning government with a leader elected by they people, not some crazy dictator that gases his own people.

And Jack, Clinton got impeached bacause he broke the friggin law!!!!!! He freakin impeached himself and admitted it. Thats what you think is the republicans "stooping to the dems level" He should have been impeached. Bush did not do anything worth even thinking about impeachment. God all you libs **** me off.
They actually did have nuclear, just not assembled. If someone is going to come check my house for guns. I am going to take them apart and hide them in pieces throughout the house. If they find a piece here or there, I can just remanufacture what they took later... Saddam thought the same way.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2009 | 01:48 PM
  #68  
RIGHTSIDE's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: the hills of WNC
liar. liar?

Originally Posted by referee54
Not blaming it on Bush or Cheney---all I am saying, Stealth is this: You guys are well into the "Liar, Liar Pants on fire" Game---and your party affiliation prevents you from owning up to being duped---taken by the nose and fooled. "Faulty intelligence" my **** it was a set up from the get-go.

Now the other guys may be lying, and you are all over like white on rice.
Man up and fess up---Bush, Cheny, et al, lied too---accept it.

I have no problem with you attacking Obama---but don't be hypocrites about it---have you come to terms with the fact (and here is what I am saying) the previous administration said something---you bought it and got into lockstep and said, "YES SIR, 'W'." Now, looking back, you won't even admit the dishonesty of that administration.

Personally, I am skeptical about much of anything ANY president says.

TSC

Liar is a harsh term, so let's look at it. For something to bhe a lie, it must not only be wrong, but it must be KNOW by the speaker to be wrong at the time he speaks it. Bush's "lies" were believed to be true by every intelligence service in the world - UN, Israeli, Chinese, Russian, French, German, Italian, Japanese, ad infinitum. They had been spoken by Democrat leaders in both houses of Congress and the White House. They were admitted by none other than Saddam Hussein himself, who threatened to use them on us and equipped his armed forces with hazmat suits prior to the outbreak of hostilities. Are we beginning to see a trend here? Perhaps Bush didn't lie. Further, there is a large amount of credible evidence that Iraq's WMD stockpile was covertly moved to Syria in the weeks leading up to the invasion (while France and Germany were stalling in every way possible). Ther are sources who purport to be able to tell where they are stored now, most saying the Bekah Valley. So Bush's "lie" was not the existence of WMDs, but rather that that statement had been in error. It is easy to chant slogans. It is easy to be enchanted by the nightly network news. It is easy to believe that everyone with whom you disagree is evil. It is easy to turn off your brain and go to ball games, races, video parlors, movies, casinos, et al. Paying attention, following the progression of events, reading between the lines, knowing a few pertinent facts - these are not quite so easy. The outcome of too many elections at all levels in the good ol' USofA bear this out. Truth is at times elusive. BUT IT IS NOT FUNGIBLE. Don't be like so many nowdays who will not coountenance the possibility that they could be wrong. If you never admit you are wrong, you never learn anything new. Want proof? Look no farther than Thomas Alva Edison. Learn, grow, improve - and quit chanting mindless slogans. America and you will be better for it.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2009 | 02:02 PM
  #69  
Norm's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
From: Seabrook,NH
Originally Posted by referee54
Like I said before---I knew tha he had used them...but did he get rid of them...that was one of the reasons we invaded, wasn't it? And where were they? Still haven't found them, have we? One of the premises for invasion was that HE STILL HAD THEM. Tough little boogers to find, aren't they? Or, maybe he didn't have them then...

TSC
The UN gave him nearly 12 years to hide them.


Originally Posted by Super FX4
Let me ask you a simple question. If you had drugs in your house and the cops said that in 3 months they were going to come invade your house. Would you leave the drugs sitting there right in front of them?
Exactly. 12 years of useless UN sanctions and cat and mouse games with inspectors gave him plenty of time to hide things.
 

Last edited by Norm; Sep 23, 2009 at 02:10 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2009 | 12:48 AM
  #70  
Maxout05's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 0
From: Ny
This is very clear to me now how the idiot got into office. Everything he does turns into bushs fault and about bushs mistakes. Every president has that story, when is obama responsible for his own. I think the one point I feel about this is many presidents screw us and hurt us but no president that I can remember has actually had the ***** to turn this country into something it was not founded for. Whether anyone likes it or not the countries rules are clearly written by its creaters. if someone doesn't like the rules they should go live somewhere else, not change the rules. This guys doing things to this country that are unfixable. Once they happen this country is something different for good. I dont think Clinton catching head in the oval office, or bush not being able to find weapons that are hidden or destroyed have changed the constitution, obama promised change and instead of that scaring people too many people thought it was good change... better think again. I don't understand how the persons running for office don't have to have their past more scrutinized before being allowed to enter office. Its seems an awful important position to me. Its pretty clear to see what obama really is and really stands for. Another thing is why did every president before him show an actuall birth certificate and he doesn't have to. It all makes no sense how we all can be so stupid to just let some person into our oval office like that.
Another thing is when 9/11 happened every american wanted to fight back. I dont think bush was really going to the right place but either way saddam was a terrible person, and thats the past. If obama was president that day what would he have done? Somehow I feel he feels the same for our country as the people who flew those planes directly into those buildings. If you dont think so thats fine, but your ignorant. We are now living for right now. How long before some country is going to be going after obama... just think about it.. once the change happens it will never ever be able to go back. Our country has a role to play in the world and its starting to show to the world that we are becoming something even they don't like. Obama is going to destroy us to the core if he doesn't sit down, read the constitution and follow it in his heart, which is obvious he never will. There is a difference between stupidity and ignorance. He plays on people every day for their ignorance. His true colors are and have been very easy to see, everyone chose to ignore them just like those hijackers were ignored by airport security on 9/11. Somethings we need to learn to not turn our backs to, our country depends on it. literally.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 AM.