Why Ford Won't Be In North America Much Longer

Old Apr 25, 2009 | 07:46 AM
  #1  
last5oh_302's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Why Ford Won't Be In North America Much Longer

http://apps.detnews.com/apps/multime...ex.php?id=1189



This is the new Ford plant in Brazil. After checking this out, one can understand why Ford will never be building another plant in the USA or Canada.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 10:31 AM
  #2  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Why would Ford waste money on new ones when the current ones can be retooled?
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 11:05 AM
  #3  
last5oh_302's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Stealth
Why would Ford waste money on new ones when the current ones can be retooled?
I heard something mentioned about the UAW?
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 11:14 AM
  #4  
Tumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 1
From: >wwOwww<
The fact about robots was best stated by Ronald Reagan, when asked about peoples jobs being displaced by robots. He said, "Those people will be building robots" I would think the union could work with that
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 11:46 AM
  #5  
Labnerd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 42
From: So. Texas
Ford wanted to build THAT plant here in the states. BUT, the UAW, in it's wondrous wisdom, said no, far too much robotics and those jobs were to be done by humans. So Ford took it off shore. It is a great concept and it works so fabulous that Toyota is attempting to implement something like it at their San Antonio plant. The suppliers are on site with manufacturing their parts on an as needed basis. While Ford can run up to 5 different cars on the same line, Toyota expects to run the Camry and the Tundra off of the same line. The fact that if there are any issues with the makers parts that they can go immediately to the line and talk with the folks that are experiencing the issue. All problems can be worked out in a matter of minutes rather than the usual months. What a concept! Letting the folks that are installing the parts talking to the folks that make the parts. So much for the worthless UAW. And by the way, if you didn't read about it yesterday, yer president said that your tax dollars will carry Chryslers UAW agreement.....meaning that if the deal with Fiat falls apart, YOU, the taxpayer, will be funding the UAWs retirement, medical, etc. You wanted change, you got change. So, who's funding your retirement?
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 11:53 AM
  #6  
ballinsoldier's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Olive Branch, MS
Unions started out with good intentions and actually did a good thing when they first began. Now they've become ridiculous, with the union heads worrying more about themselves than the best interest of the workers. Unions are dragging down company after company with their demands.

It's almost impossible to fire someone who truly sucks at their job if they're in a union. Now that's good business!

The more that I think about it, Unions and Affirmative action have a lot in common, and that's not a good thing.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 11:54 AM
  #7  
Super FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
I'm happy to see what Ford has been doing lately.

Stock Shares are shooting up, not taking bail out money, slowly getting rid of the union parasites, and quality is up with honda & toyota now.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 12:07 PM
  #8  
dlenkewich's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by Stealth
Why would Ford waste money on new ones when the current ones can be retooled?
Why would they want to put any plants here when they can move offshore and buy land cheaper, labourer's cheaper..
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 12:16 PM
  #9  
Tumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 1
From: >wwOwww<
Originally Posted by Labnerd
Ford wanted to build THAT plant here in the states. BUT, the UAW, in it's wondrous wisdom, said no, far too much robotics and those jobs were to be done by humans. So Ford took it off shore. It is a great concept and it works so fabulous that Toyota is attempting to implement something like it at their San Antonio plant. The suppliers are on site with manufacturing their parts on an as needed basis. While Ford can run up to 5 different cars on the same line, Toyota expects to run the Camry and the Tundra off of the same line. The fact that if there are any issues with the makers parts that they can go immediately to the line and talk with the folks that are experiencing the issue. All problems can be worked out in a matter of minutes rather than the usual months. What a concept! Letting the folks that are installing the parts talking to the folks that make the parts. So much for the worthless UAW. And by the way, if you didn't read about it yesterday, yer president said that your tax dollars will carry Chryslers UAW agreement.....meaning that if the deal with Fiat falls apart, YOU, the taxpayer, will be funding the UAWs retirement, medical, etc. You wanted change, you got change. So, who's funding your retirement?
I think maybe the Tundra and the Camry use the same Chassis

As far as my retirement, The market collapse, there is no retirement for me.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 12:57 PM
  #10  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by dlenkewich
Why would they want to put any plants here when they can move offshore and buy land cheaper, labourer's cheaper..
Why did you quote my statement and make that comment? My statement was about retooling current plants, not about building new plants.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 12:58 PM
  #11  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by last5oh_302
I heard something mentioned about the UAW?
Blah blah, someone has to be the scapegoat.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 01:01 PM
  #12  
risupercrewman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 5
From: Rhode Island
I am Pro-Union & proud of it!....Been in one for the past 21 Years!.....
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 01:43 PM
  #13  
Super FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by Stealth
Blah blah, someone has to be the scapegoat.
When you mean scape goat, do you mean liberal obama supporting, parasite sucking "skilled" worker?

Unions are worthless these days, and in bad economic times they still protest and try to get more $$$ while others are getting laid off.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 07:13 PM
  #14  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by Super FX4
When you mean scape goat, do you mean liberal obama supporting, parasite sucking "skilled" worker?

Unions are worthless these days, and in bad economic times they still protest and try to get more $$$ while others are getting laid off.
I'll give you that. You're entitled to your own opinion.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 07:13 PM
  #15  
screwbuilder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Wow, with all the union bashing going on how do you explain that Fords most productive plant and highest quality plant is right here in the good ole USA staffed by UAW employees???
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:35 AM.