Ford Quiz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 02:40 PM
  #46  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by bluejay432000
1968 for the 302?
I worked on a guy's 302 Mustang, and I think it was a 68, may have been a 69, tho.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 02:43 PM
  #47  
PKRWUD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, California
I believe you, but both of those years are incorrect.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #48  
Zaairman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
But wasn't the 302 introduced in 1968?
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #49  
PKRWUD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, California
Originally Posted by Zaairman
But wasn't the 302 introduced in 1968?
To the best of my knowledge, yes.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 03:11 PM
  #50  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
I guess maybe it would have to be 1967 then?
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 03:14 PM
  #51  
F150PARTSGUY's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
We are trying to come up with a 302 Windsor...... Dont think it was ever called Windsor... There was the 351W and the 4.6l W but...

Dennis
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 03:17 PM
  #52  
PKRWUD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, California
Originally Posted by F150PARTSGUY
We are trying to come up with a 302 Windsor...... Dont think it was ever called Windsor... There was the 351W and the 4.6l W but...

Dennis
You're on the right track, but there is a correct year answer.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 03:28 PM
  #53  
dirt bike dave's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
I think the 302 was officially called the Windsor in Australia, in the 1970 Falcon.

So I'll guess 1970.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 03:31 PM
  #54  
PKRWUD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, California
Originally Posted by dirt bike dave
I think the 302 was officially called the Windsor in Australia, in the 1970 Falcon.

So I'll guess 1970.
That's possible, I really don't know. I'm going off of "official" Ford info, and they have a different answer, so for now, I'm gonna say that's incorrect.


I have to split in about 15 minutes, do you guys just want the answer?
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 03:33 PM
  #55  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by PKRWUD
That's possible, I really don't know. I'm going off of "official" Ford info, and they have a different answer, so for now, I'm gonna say that's incorrect.


I have to split in about 15 minutes, do you guys just want the answer?
Yep, but it's wrong, because I know that a 302 built in Windsor, Ont. went in Fords in 1968.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 03:35 PM
  #56  
dirt bike dave's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Sure, give us the answer.

I know the 'Windsor' family 221 started out in about 1962, but the early 'Windsor' 221-260-289 motors were made in Cleveland until 1966. The 302 replaced the 289 in 1968, and was made in Windsor, but may have not been 'officially' called that. So if it is not 1968, it must be later.

Maybe the 302 was officially designated the Windsor when the first 351M motors came out? Mid 1970's?
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 03:39 PM
  #57  
PKRWUD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, California
According to “The Official Ford Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference and Performance Handbook”:
Conventions can be confusing. Enthusiasts typically refer to Ford’s popular V-8s by names that describe the combustion chamber/valve arrangement in the engine’s cylinder heads. In enthusiast parlance, Ford Windsor engines are V-8s built with inline valves, while Cleveland powerplants have staggered, compound-angle (canted) valves. Ford understandably prefers to apply the Windsor and Cleveland nomenclature to engines produced by those particular plants. According to the factory way of thinking, the Mustang’s 5-liter V-8 was manufactured only by Ford’s Cleveland Engine Plant, so therefore it can not be a “Windsor V-8.” Enthusiasts see inline valves and know it can not be called a “Cleveland.” For this reason, this guide refers to the 5-liter V-8 only as a member of Ford’s small block V-8 family and not by its popular (but formally inappropriate) “Windsor” designation. The Ford FRPP catalog refers to the 289 and 302 V-8s as “Windsor-style” engines. This series of small blocks has also been referred to as Ford’s ‘90°V” powerplant family.

However, starting in 1994, the 5.0L truck engines were built at the Windsor Engine Plant Number Two, making them the first official production 302W.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 03:41 PM
  #58  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by PKRWUD
According to “The Official Ford Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference and Performance Handbook”:
Conventions can be confusing. Enthusiasts typically refer to Ford’s popular V-8s by names that describe the combustion chamber/valve arrangement in the engine’s cylinder heads. In enthusiast parlance, Ford Windsor engines are V-8s built with inline valves, while Cleveland powerplants have staggered, compound-angle (canted) valves. Ford understandably prefers to apply the Windsor and Cleveland nomenclature to engines produced by those particular plants. According to the factory way of thinking, the Mustang’s 5-liter V-8 was manufactured only by Ford’s Cleveland Engine Plant, so therefore it can not be a “Windsor V-8.” Enthusiasts see inline valves and know it can not be called a “Cleveland.” For this reason, this guide refers to the 5-liter V-8 only as a member of Ford’s small block V-8 family and not by its popular (but formally inappropriate) “Windsor” designation. The Ford FRPP catalog refers to the 289 and 302 V-8s as “Windsor-style” engines. This series of small blocks has also been referred to as Ford’s ‘90°V” powerplant family.

However, starting in 1994, the 5.0L truck engines were built at the Windsor Engine Plant Number Two, making them the first official production 302W.
Hell, we know more about their engines than they do! That was a sneaky question! Good one.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 03:43 PM
  #59  
F150PARTSGUY's Avatar
Former Sponsor
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
what he said

Ed
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 06:18 PM
  #60  
FoMoCoFan17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
In 1959, General Motors released the El Camino. During one of the first road tests, the Elky suffered a breakdown, and the service vehicle that came to the rescue was a _______. Much to GM's chagrin, the incident was caught on film. GM faltered and didn't produce the El Camino again until 1964.

Fill in the blank.

Hint: It's a Ford.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 PM.