Ford Quiz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 12:00 PM
  #31  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by Zaairman
Um... You're missing a few.

Edited to add: Even with the edit.
you sure? What are they?
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 12:04 PM
  #32  
Zaairman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
332
352
360
361
390
391
406
410
427
428

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_FE_engine
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 12:06 PM
  #33  
FoMoCoFan17's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Originally Posted by bluejay432000
you sure? What are they?
410 maybe? Mercury though.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 12:09 PM
  #34  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by Zaairman
332
352
360
361
390
391
406
410
427
428

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_FE_engine
I remember seeing one 406, now. A guy had it in a fake Thunderbolt down in Waco. Seems like Lincolns or Edsils might have had some of those bastard sizes, but you never saw one, even at a salvage yard.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 12:12 PM
  #35  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
The early Mustangs used two different 4 speed transmission. What is the name of the stroger, more sought after 4 speed?
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 02:00 PM
  #36  
PKRWUD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, California
They used a T10 and Ford built tranny that I always heard referred to as a "Dagenham." Of the two, the Dagenham was stronger.


***edit***
Okay, well, after answering, I tried looking online for an answer, and it seems the Dagenham was used on a lot of straight sixes, so maybe it wasn't the stronger of the two, but that's still how I remember it. Oh well.
 

Last edited by PKRWUD; Aug 22, 2008 at 02:07 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 02:08 PM
  #37  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by PKRWUD
They used a T10 and Ford built tranny that I always heard referred to as a "Dagenham." Of the two, the Dagenham was stronger.
Are you certain? I have always heard the stronger one referred to as "top loader", for obvious reasons. But now that you say what you have, is it also the Dagenham? I think the weaker side loader is the T10.


My memory is probably playing tricks on me, but for some reason, I was connecting the Dagebham with the six cylinder.
 
__________________
Jim

Last edited by Bluejay; Aug 22, 2008 at 02:12 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 02:14 PM
  #38  
PKRWUD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, California
I edited my original answer to include what I found after I answered.

The Dagenham wasn't a top loader, and you're right, the top loader was stronger. I guess there were three 4 speeds available.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 02:21 PM
  #39  
PKRWUD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, California
I've got a fun question for you anyway:

What was the first production (installed in a production vehicle) year for the 302 Windsor?
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 02:22 PM
  #40  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by PKRWUD
I edited my original answer to include what I found after I answered.

The Dagenham wasn't a top loader, and you're right, the top loader was stronger. I guess there were three 4 speeds available.
Yeah, I think the Dagenham was for the six cylinder only and may not have even been syncronized.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 02:27 PM
  #41  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
PKRWUD, ask a question.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 02:31 PM
  #42  
PKRWUD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, California
Originally Posted by bluejay432000
PKRWUD, ask a question.
I did, lol, but I'll ask it again:

What was the first production (installed in a production vehicle) year for the 302 Windsor?
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 02:32 PM
  #43  
Zaairman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,843
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, MO
Originally Posted by PKRWUD
I did, lol, but I'll ask it again:

What was the first production (installed in a production vehicle) year for the 302 Windsor?
Going out on a limb here... 1978

ETA: And I'm wrong.
 
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 02:37 PM
  #44  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
1968 for the 302?
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 02:38 PM
  #45  
PKRWUD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, California
Originally Posted by Zaairman
Going out on a limb here... 1978

ETA: And I'm wrong.
Don't feel bad, it's kind of a trick question. There is a correct year answer, but very few people get it right.


Originally Posted by bluejay432000
1968 for the 302?
Nope.
 

Last edited by PKRWUD; Aug 22, 2008 at 02:41 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 PM.