UAW in Detroit...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 07:30 PM
  #136  
screwbuilder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Auto Repair...

Originally Posted by Quintin
The only thing the UAW is doing for its members that matters is encouraging them to do a half *** job...when (not if, when) they screw something up, the assembly worker doesn't have to answer to the man directly, they got big momma union in their corner to speak for them.

They take personal accountability out of the picture, so the workers can cruise along and not worry about their asses going into the fire when something goes wrong. They can't fire a screw up half *** on the line for not doing his/her job properly, the union won't allow that - after all, that's what the union is there to do, right, protect its members?

The company suffers and the customers who buy that junk suffer. But the UAW is doing great things for their members.
So, if I take my car in to a service department and it wasn't right the first time that mechanic should be fired?? I think not. He will be disciplined like we are. Most likely everyone on this board has taken a car in to be fixed and get home and it is not right. Mistakes do happen. Most problems on todays vehicles are problems with parts going bad. Recalls do not happen because something was assembled wrong but because a part was bad, faulty, cheap, etc. You said it yourself, autoworkers just do step A,B,C. We do not decide who supplies the parts we install. Most of the dead weight has been weeded out of our plant. Our work force is better than ever and we do care about quality.

I recently read how Ford dealership service departments are doing less and less warranty work and have to look for new ways to bring people into their shops. A good example would be how you now see tires advertised in dealer ads. You never use to see that. One could argue that the way mechanics get paid is wrong with flat rates. I know good mechanics who work a 40 hour week but get paid 70+ hours of flat time. That could be considered getting overpaid by those paying for the repairs but I know they work their butts off most of the time.

An article today from the AP says the new contract with GM will save the company 2-3 billion dollars a year. Most of the difference in UAW and non UAW plants is because of retirees. The big 3 have them, others do not. I would not be surprised to see the foreign manufacturers leave the US when they get X amount of retirees. With no wage increases for this contract autoworkers will have received a total of 2% over 10 years going back to the last 2 contracts. We have given up a lot but you cannot ask any employee to take a $10.00 per hour pay cut. No one could survive doing that.

People are always talking about health care costs rising but the UAW is the bad guy for wanting good health care??? Doesn't make sense to me.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 07:56 PM
  #137  
Quintin's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,509
Likes: 6
From: Georgia on my mind...
Originally Posted by Lumadar
Classic avoidance. I expected more than that from you...
You'll have to talk to his union rep if you want to carry on this conversation.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 08:16 PM
  #138  
Lumadar's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by Quintin
You'll have to talk to his union rep if you want to carry on this conversation.
lmao...so true....so true
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 08:31 PM
  #139  
Quintin's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,509
Likes: 6
From: Georgia on my mind...
Originally Posted by swank07'
Scabs are a different story, they are the people who are members that are weak and cross picket lines, taking food from other brothers and sisters.
They pay dues ( although 99% of scabs donate to a charity of some sort instead of the union getting their money) and they are still represented as a union member.
Their co-workers however have ways of dealing with scabs and take appropriate action towards them.
Remember, they crossed a picket line, and after the strike is over, they get the benefits you and your co-workers fought\stuck for. All the while still getting a check, along with a brown nose.
Can you stop for a second and realize how stupid this sounds?

I'm not going to post what I really want to say about this, 'cause I think I'm already treading on thin ice with management around here. Just wow.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 08:42 PM
  #140  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
Originally Posted by screwbuilder
So, if I take my car in to a service department and it wasn't right the first time that mechanic should be fired?? I think not. He will be disciplined like we are. Most likely everyone on this board has taken a car in to be fixed and get home and it is not right. Mistakes do happen. Most problems on todays vehicles are problems with parts going bad. Recalls do not happen because something was assembled wrong but because a part was bad, faulty, cheap, etc. You said it yourself, autoworkers just do step A,B,C. We do not decide who supplies the parts we install. Most of the dead weight has been weeded out of our plant. Our work force is better than ever and we do care about quality.
So from my earlier post...

For example in the last few years I have bought 3 new F-150s, my mom has bought a new Zephyr and my sister has bought a Mustang. Two of the F-150s have had build issues. One of the F-150s had improperly adjusted cables on the sunroof the other had several trim pieces that were not properly installed. The Mustang left the factory with a broken valve cover. The Zephyr did not have a single build issue. So in the case of just my family 3/4ths of the vehicles make at a UAW factory have had build quality issues. The one that was make outside the UAW not a single flaw. I am only referring to issues that directly came from the person who put the screws into the parts, not the design.
How is putting a broken valve cover on doing quality work? What about not adjusting the cables on the sunroof, or my favorite not installing the trim correctly? I can and did put the trim pieces on properly and I don't even have a union card. None of these issues were from bad parts. They were mistakes made by the guy putting the parts on the vehicle.

Still no one can answer my question. What does a company get in return for its extra cost of having union workers?
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 08:49 PM
  #141  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Forgive me. I lied. I also don't appreciate getting bagged on just because I said I wouldn't be posting in this thread any more.

Wookie
What does a company get in return for its extra cost of having union workers?
Ask the company, they offer the CBA to union members.

Quintin
You'll have to talk to his union rep if you want to carry on this conversation.
I don't have union representation here.

Lumadar
Classic avoidance. I expected more than that from you...
As with you.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 08:59 PM
  #142  
Quintin's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,509
Likes: 6
From: Georgia on my mind...
Okay, since this thread has veered off the course of beating up on the UAW, I'll drink the Kool-Aid, unions are great, unions are good, blah, blah, blah.

Just someone, any of you union goons, explain to me the justification behind what this guy said. Specifically, the bolded parts.

Originally Posted by swank07'
Stealth is correct, union membership is voluntary, you still have to pay dues( which can go to your church, or other various charities.) however you cannot vote in elections of officials.
You are still represented if the company comes after you though.

Scabs are a different story, they are the people who are members that are weak and cross picket lines, taking food from other brothers and sisters.
They pay dues ( although 99% of scabs donate to a charity of some sort instead of the union getting their money) and they are still represented as a union member.
Their co-workers however have ways of dealing with scabs and take appropriate action towards them.
Remember, they crossed a picket line, and after the strike is over, they get the benefits you and your co-workers fought\stuck for. All the while still getting a check, along with a brown nose.
They're still taking money, but membership is voluntary. Ummm...

And union members, being great, upholding members of the community and economy that they are, will apparently take action (violent, perhaps) against a "scab" who decides to do different than the hive mind puppets and their union boss overseer wants them all to do.

Explain to me the justification behind this. It's obvious we ain't gonna get a straight answer about what benefit the unions are, explain to me why money is taken for a "voluntary" cause, and why slackjawed jackbooted union thugs who swear up and down they're the greatest, bestest people on the planet, seemingly may "take appropriate action" towards people who don't follow the whole.

The term "take appropriate action" in the history of unions sounds like someone's gonna have a terrible accident at the plant and have both their knees broken.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 09:06 PM
  #143  
screwbuilder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Problems....

Originally Posted by Wookie
So from my earlier post...



How is putting a broken valve cover on doing quality work? What about not adjusting the cables on the sunroof, or my favorite not installing the trim correctly? I can and did put the trim pieces on properly and I don't even have a union card. None of these issues were from bad parts. They were mistakes made by the guy putting the parts on the vehicle.

Still no one can answer my question. What does a company get in return for its extra cost of having union workers?
Not sure what you mean by improperly adjusted cables on a sunroof. We install the complete unit, not really sure of any cable adjustment. Most likely suppose to be done by the vendor but possibly could have been caught.

Trim piece, should have been caught either at the plant or the dealer. Like I said mistakes do happen. I understand being upset about it but doesn't really make it a poorly built truck does it??

Don't really see how a mustang had a broken valve cover from the plant but I guess it could happen. Engines come to the assembly plant completely assembled. If it was cracked it should have been caught at the engine plant, assembly plant or dealer.

Not sure if there is a lot of "extra cost" of union workers. Toyota workers only make a few dollars per hour less than UAW workers. As shown in the recent agreement by GM and the UAW, now they can be competitive with the foreign brands now that they aren't bothered by retiree costs saving them 2 to 3 BILLION per year.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 09:06 PM
  #144  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by Quintin
Okay, since this thread has veered off the course of beating up on the UAW, I'll drink the Kool-Aid, unions are great, unions are good, blah, blah, blah.

Just someone, any of you union goons, explain to me the justification behind what this guy said. Specifically, the bolded parts.



They're still taking money, but membership is voluntary. Ummm...

And union members, being great, upholding members of the community and economy that they are, will apparently take action (violent, perhaps) against a "scab" who decides to do different than the hive mind puppets and their union boss overseer wants them all to do.

Explain to me the justification behind this. It's obvious we ain't gonna get a straight answer about what benefit the unions are, explain to me why money is taken for a "voluntary" cause, and why slackjawed jackbooted union thugs who swear up and down they're the greatest, bestest people on the planet, seemingly may "take appropriate action" towards people who don't follow the whole.

The term "take appropriate action" in the history of unions sounds like someone's gonna have a terrible accident at the plant and have both their knees broken.
Well, there's been a history of bad things happening to scabs, but there have been bad things happen throughout all of history as well, all have been learning experiences. I do not condone violence against scabs, that's ridiculous. They just get the scab label attached to them forever.

Appropriate action, when it used to happen decades ago, never happens at the workplace, it's always off company property, kind of like getting in a fight after school. But that doesn't happen anymore, at least not at my place of work. That activity is not condoned or sponsored union behavior, it's sheer stupidity and isn't tolerated.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 09:17 PM
  #145  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
Originally Posted by screwbuilder
Not sure what you mean by improperly adjusted cables on a sunroof. We install the complete unit, not really sure of any cable adjustment. Most likely suppose to be done by the vendor but possibly could have been caught.

Trim piece, should have been caught either at the plant or the dealer. Like I said mistakes do happen. I understand being upset about it but doesn't really make it a poorly built truck does it??

Don't really see how a mustang had a broken valve cover from the plant but I guess it could happen. Engines come to the assembly plant completely assembled. If it was cracked it should have been caught at the engine plant, assembly plant or dealer.

Not sure if there is a lot of "extra cost" of union workers. Toyota workers only make a few dollars per hour less than UAW workers. As shown in the recent agreement by GM and the UAW, now they can be competitive with the foreign brands now that they aren't bothered by retiree costs saving them 2 to 3 BILLION per year.
The valve cover on the Mustang was broken at the PVC valve. About 1/2 of the mounting boss was gone and a crack ran across the top for several inches.

I also forgot about the over tightened lug nuts on the '05. I had to change out all of the wheel studs on the rear end at the first tire rotation. The lug nuts were so tight that I could barely remove then with a 36" breaker bar.

I don't mean to put you down, please don't take it that way. I just am just more than a little bit tired of the highest paid group of unskilled workers (UAW) complaining about getting screwed. What really rubs salt in the wound is the fact that they are being out done by Mexican workers making half the money.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #146  
Quintin's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,509
Likes: 6
From: Georgia on my mind...
Originally Posted by screwbuilder
So, if I take my car in to a service department and it wasn't right the first time that mechanic should be fired?? I think not.
The first time is excusable. The second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, hundredth, thousandth time for vehicles sent to dealers across the country, not so excusable.
Originally Posted by screwbuilder
He will be disciplined like we are.
I'm ignorant to this, but what kinda consequences will an assembler who ain't got his stuff together face?
Originally Posted by screwbuilder
Most problems on todays vehicles are problems with parts going bad. Recalls do not happen because something was assembled wrong but because a part was bad, faulty, cheap, etc. You said it yourself, autoworkers just do step A,B,C. We do not decide who supplies the parts we install. Most of the dead weight has been weeded out of our plant. Our work force is better than ever and we do care about quality.
In 11 pages, I don't think anyone mentioned recalls. I'll be the first to admit that parts quality ain't what it should be. But fit and finish is a direct responsibility of assembly, and thus far I think that's what some of us have been griping about. **** poor assembly and fit and finish.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 09:34 PM
  #147  
screwbuilder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Lug nuts...

Originally Posted by Wookie
The valve cover on the Mustang was broken at the PVC valve. About 1/2 of the mounting boss was gone and a crack ran across the top for several inches.

I also forgot about the over tightened lug nuts on the '05. I had to change out all of the wheel studs on the rear end at the first tire rotation. The lug nuts were so tight that I could barely remove then with a 36" breaker bar.

I don't mean to put you down, please don't take it that way. I just am just more than a little bit tired of the highest paid group of unskilled workers (UAW) complaining about getting screwed. What really rubs salt in the wound is the fact that they are being out done by Mexican workers making half the money.
We use computer controlled DC tools on all critical nuts and bolts. They cannot be overtorqued so not sure how that could have happened. These guns automatically stop at the proper torque. We cannot sit there and torque them tighter no matter what. Only air tools like the dealers use can do that.

I don't really hear any UAW workers "complaining about getting screwed". I haven't seen any of that on this board. I do see people who obviously have no idea what it is like to work on an automotive assembly line complaining about how much someone else makes. You can take almost any occupation and find someone who thinks they are paid too much. I guess everyone has an opinion and opinions vary.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 09:47 PM
  #148  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
I don't know how they got that way but the wheel studs had been stretched to the point that the studs had necked to about 2/3rds the original diameter. I bought the truck new. As far as I know the wheels had only been put on at the factory and never again touched. The truck still had on the factory KR wheels and the tires that matched the sticker. I have no reason to believe that thy had ever been removed, especially since both rear wheels had this problem. The fronts seemed to be tight but after several checks I could not find where the studs had been damaged. I started a thread about it in the '04+ forum when it happened.

In my opinion the concept of a union bothers me as a worker, much like Socialism. I would never bust a$$ when I know the guy nest to me will get the same raise if he jerks off most of the time. Personally I fine it enjoyable to get a 10+% annual raise when the guy next to me only gets 2%.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 09:50 PM
  #149  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Jesus, you've guys got controlled tools and you get that much money? I don't know whats wrong with the world. I don't know why you say that you guys "build" them it seems like you manage the tools that build them.

I wonder if RP would be willing to set-up a poll of who wants to get rid of the UAW and who wants to keep it!?
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 10:01 PM
  #150  
PONY_DRIVER's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
From: VA
Union membership is voluntary? It wasn't when I was in a union. I HAD to effing join or quit.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 PM.