Intel Or Amd
Get the Intel....don't even give it a second thought. I work for Intel and have contratcted for other chip manufactures. Intel truely does make a good product.
Shane
Shane
Last edited by Shane1; May 18, 2007 at 10:33 AM.
I swear by Intel but whatever you decide on just make sure you get lots of fast ram. 2gb at least (especially if it comes with Vista) and more if you can afford it. If you're buying one that's already built it's usually cheaper to add more as an upgrade to begin with than to add it later.
Originally Posted by RockPick
Agreed 200%. Vista is a resource HOG.
http://www.itworldcanada.com/Pages/D...94a&sub=334877
Much of the 'hoggery' is from all the extra (read unnecessary) utilities & crap running as a service and/or in the tray....clean dat chit up, and it'll run much better, IMHO.
For the OP - I'd choose Intel at the moment. Especially in a notebook.
Bubba
. <----- my conformal sig lol
Originally Posted by RockPick
Originally Posted by Larry
... 2gb at least (especially if it comes with Vista) and more if you can afford it.
[quote]Throwing more memory at a system doesn't always make it faster[/url]
I think with Vista you will see an improvement. Especially since Vista itself will use most of 1gb just for itself. Throw in Norton and the various other things that end up running at boot after awhile and you're into your swap file before you even check your email.
I think with Vista you will see an improvement. Especially since Vista itself will use most of 1gb just for itself. Throw in Norton and the various other things that end up running at boot after awhile and you're into your swap file before you even check your email.
I run Vista biz with all the bells and whistles on a Core Duo laptop with 1GB of memory. No issues and performance is great. Would an extra GB of RAM help? Eh, sometimes... mainly with CS3 or Premier Pro but that's about it. Most of its life its spent on the web, basic office crap and light duty music/video stuff. Like I said, the bigger speed boost is with a hybrid hard drive or usb memory to let Vista do its caching magic. This dude wouldn't gain much from the memory.
Yeah D - that's a good point.
Vista's ability to cache to a high speed external flash key (called Readyboost) is nice.
Adds a relatively cheap boost in boot time & performance.
Only downsides - key sticking out on a laptop, and not all keys are fast enough.
Use a 2-4GB key....
More info here: http://www.extremetech.com/article2/...2017849,00.asp
Vista's ability to cache to a high speed external flash key (called Readyboost) is nice.
Adds a relatively cheap boost in boot time & performance.
Only downsides - key sticking out on a laptop, and not all keys are fast enough.
Use a 2-4GB key....
More info here: http://www.extremetech.com/article2/...2017849,00.asp
Last edited by MGDfan; May 18, 2007 at 11:07 AM.
Originally Posted by MGDfan
Only downsides - key sticking out on a laptop, and not all keys are fast enough.
Use a 2-4GB key....
Use a 2-4GB key....
I use both intel and amd for all my stuff. If your looking for a basic rig, your going to save money by going with a low end amd 64. Before you decide anything go to motherboards.org and check out the ranking. They do a really good job deciding which boards are most versitle.
Basic rule of thumb, processors don't matter much anymore tho, if you want to splurge, go for a good graphics setup rather than the latest processor.
Basic rule of thumb, processors don't matter much anymore tho, if you want to splurge, go for a good graphics setup rather than the latest processor.
Originally Posted by HeWasAJumperBoy
Basic rule of thumb, processors don't matter much anymore tho, if you want to splurge, go for a good graphics setup rather than the latest processor.
And fast graphics don't mean diddly in an underpowered system...
IMO intel. my last p4 dell lasted 7 years on one reformat.
BTW PSSMAG, i got my new pc.
its a 2.8ghz pentium D with dual core.
a gig of ram.
asus motherboard
and an nvidia 6800 XT 256mb. im incredibly pleased.
it's such an upgrade to my old 7 year dell
.
and i just ordered a 20'' Dell UltraSharp wide screen LCD. cant wait to get it!
p.s. rockpick. any news on the logo work?
BTW PSSMAG, i got my new pc.
its a 2.8ghz pentium D with dual core.
a gig of ram.
asus motherboard
and an nvidia 6800 XT 256mb. im incredibly pleased.
it's such an upgrade to my old 7 year dell
.and i just ordered a 20'' Dell UltraSharp wide screen LCD. cant wait to get it!
Originally Posted by RockPick
In my opinion... either/or.
At one point in time, I would've leaned one way and at another, I would've leaned the other way. Right now, I think they're both making very good chipsets and that there really isn't that big of a gap between them on performance.
JMO.
At one point in time, I would've leaned one way and at another, I would've leaned the other way. Right now, I think they're both making very good chipsets and that there really isn't that big of a gap between them on performance.
JMO.
p.s. rockpick. any news on the logo work?
Originally Posted by JBMX928
IMO intel. my last p4 dell lasted 7 years on one reformat.
Neither of them sure dont make them that durable anymore.
Originally Posted by JBMX928
BTW PSSMAG, i got my new pc.
its a 2.8ghz pentium D with dual core.
a gig of ram.
asus motherboard
and an nvidia 6800 XT 256mb. im incredibly pleased.
it's such an upgrade to my old 7 year dell
.
and i just ordered a 20'' Dell UltraSharp wide screen LCD. cant wait to get it!
p.s. rockpick. any news on the logo work?
its a 2.8ghz pentium D with dual core.
a gig of ram.
asus motherboard
and an nvidia 6800 XT 256mb. im incredibly pleased.
it's such an upgrade to my old 7 year dell
.and i just ordered a 20'' Dell UltraSharp wide screen LCD. cant wait to get it!
p.s. rockpick. any news on the logo work?
Yea I remember when I first got this last fall I thought, daaaaang this is a helluva fast machine. Which compared to my old one then it is.


