You thought I was crazy (GM / Ford Alliance)
You thought I was crazy (GM / Ford Alliance)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060918/ap_on_bi_ge/gm_ford
I said this months ago... (What if?)
Oh you're crazy...
That'll be the day...
Are you on crack...
Now look... The powers that be are contemplating it. I guess it's "circle the wagons" time. Too bad Chrysler can't really help, you know, since they're not really one of "us", anymore... And, with hot cars hitting the market (300, Magnum, Charger, Liberty, Commander...), and the 3rd hottest truck (Ram), they really don't need to...
I said this months ago... (What if?)
Oh you're crazy...
That'll be the day...
Are you on crack...
Now look... The powers that be are contemplating it. I guess it's "circle the wagons" time. Too bad Chrysler can't really help, you know, since they're not really one of "us", anymore... And, with hot cars hitting the market (300, Magnum, Charger, Liberty, Commander...), and the 3rd hottest truck (Ram), they really don't need to...
Originally Posted by bluejay432000
Explain to me how you being right about one thing means you are not crazy!

Good point..
OK, business-wise, I knew something like this might make sense... It might tick off some blue oval guys, and some GM fans; but from a business perspective, this could be a formidable alliance. It probably won't happen, but, imagine an F-150 with GM's 6.1L 345 HP V-8 engine...
Or, better yet, a Mustang with the 6.1L V8, massaged to 380 - 400 HP as it is in the GTO. The only guys wo'd REALLY be pissed, is the UAW- but, I wouldn't really care, and they shouldn't either, as long as they still have jobs.
I said it then and I'll say it now...
What in the world makes them think if they can't manage their own companies that combining two failing companies into one big mess will make it easier...
I guess it would streamline the Chapter 7 or 11 process though.
What in the world makes them think if they can't manage their own companies that combining two failing companies into one big mess will make it easier...
I guess it would streamline the Chapter 7 or 11 process though.
Originally Posted by vader716
I said it then and I'll say it now...
What in the world makes them think if they can't manage their own companies that combining two failing companies into one big mess will make it easier...
I guess it would streamline the Chapter 7 or 11 process though.
What in the world makes them think if they can't manage their own companies that combining two failing companies into one big mess will make it easier...
I guess it would streamline the Chapter 7 or 11 process though.
If GM/Ford/Renault/Nissan comes together, I think they should make Carlos Ghosn the CEO.
Originally Posted by RandallT
Mattineer is going to loose his mind................
Look at it this way, if they merge, we can double the "crap" output....
How about Ford and Honda merge?
Look at it this way, if they merge, we can double the "crap" output....
How about Ford and Honda merge?
The Fusion is Sexy now, and the 500 is growign on me. Imagine those cars infused with some Japanese quality control, know-how, and attention to detail.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by vader716
I said it then and I'll say it now...
What in the world makes them think if they can't manage their own companies that combining two failing companies into one big mess will make it easier...
I guess it would streamline the Chapter 7 or 11 process though.
What in the world makes them think if they can't manage their own companies that combining two failing companies into one big mess will make it easier...
I guess it would streamline the Chapter 7 or 11 process though.
Each company is struggling with resources and cash flow, streamlining and combining components or sub assemblies might each the economic pinch they're both feeling. A you lean on me and I'll lean on you and we both won't fall down sort of thing.
Originally Posted by PONY_DRIVER
...you lean on me and I'll lean on you and we both won't fall down sort of thing.
ahh the making of a truly successful venture...
I think they should write that in the new business plan.
Welcome to GMORD where we lean on each other to keep from falling over.
Built GMORD tough....like a rock
The heartbeat of the hoofbeats
How can it fail
Speaking of GM...I guess you've seen the new 2007 Silverado and GMC twin? If you ask me, they look great. I see they've taken a lot of hints from the new 2004 F150 though...easy lift tailgate, new front suspension with rack and pinion, boxed frame, power rear supercab windows, etc, etc. The interior is very nice...just nice overall. If it runs, drives, holds up as well as it looks, it'll be a nice truck.
http://www.chevrolet.com/silverado/prelaunch/index.jsp
..
http://www.chevrolet.com/silverado/prelaunch/index.jsp
..
I think combining the two corporate cultures would probably put the combined organization into rigor mortis.
I mean, it's one thing to have a DC-type thing, where both organizations retain a certain amount of autonomy. But combining companies with so many competing and/or overlapping product lines would be extremely difficult, if not impossible to pull off!
I think the UAW alone would probably bring the company down with some kind of "scorched earth" negotiating policy once they were faced with losing that many jobs!
I mean, it's one thing to have a DC-type thing, where both organizations retain a certain amount of autonomy. But combining companies with so many competing and/or overlapping product lines would be extremely difficult, if not impossible to pull off!
I think the UAW alone would probably bring the company down with some kind of "scorched earth" negotiating policy once they were faced with losing that many jobs!
Originally Posted by ddellwo
I think combining the two corporate cultures would probably put the combined organization into rigor mortis.
I mean, it's one thing to have a DC-type thing, where both organizations retain a certain amount of autonomy. But combining companies with so many competing and/or overlapping product lines would be extremely difficult, if not impossible to pull off!
I think the UAW alone would probably bring the company down with some kind of "scorched earth" negotiating policy once they were faced with losing that many jobs!
I mean, it's one thing to have a DC-type thing, where both organizations retain a certain amount of autonomy. But combining companies with so many competing and/or overlapping product lines would be extremely difficult, if not impossible to pull off!
I think the UAW alone would probably bring the company down with some kind of "scorched earth" negotiating policy once they were faced with losing that many jobs!
The last chart I saw was for 2000, and it was sponsored by Visteon. I still have it, but it's way too large to scan. Quick search online didn't turn up anything concrete....
As for the talks, nothing concrete or recent AFAIK.
http://today.reuters.com/news/articl...D-UPDATE-2.XML
Originally Posted by vader716
ahh the making of a truly successful venture...
I think they should write that in the new business plan.
Welcome to GMORD where we lean on each other to keep from falling over.
Built GMORD tough....like a rock
The heartbeat of the hoofbeats
How can it fail
I think they should write that in the new business plan.
Welcome to GMORD where we lean on each other to keep from falling over.
Built GMORD tough....like a rock
The heartbeat of the hoofbeats
How can it fail
GMORD or FORGM? I like the latter



