Brain Teaser - Will it take off??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 05:47 PM
  #271  
Tumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 1
From: >wwOwww<
Originally Posted by CDB03STX
Isn't this the same as if the plane was on wheels and on the conveyor?
Yes 0 airspeed it will not take off because it is only moving on a moving fluid serface. conveyor= moving water=0 airspeed that is required to fly
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 05:52 PM
  #272  
Deskinsd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
I blame this all on the fact that the mythbusters used a tundra to pull the material that the plane was on.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #273  
Tumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 1
From: >wwOwww<
Originally Posted by Deskinsd
I blame this all on the fact that the mythbusters used a tundra to pull the material that the plane was on.
i've seen the preview but havent seen the episode yet.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 06:49 PM
  #274  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
OK, I see the problem here.

Our discussions are about two different things. One is about a plane traveling against a conveyor and overpowering it and taking off. Yes it will take off, just like the MB episode, though their conclusion was highly unscientific.

What I'm saying is in direct correlation to the OP's original statement, which is completely different than that which some you are discussing.

If the conveyor is travelling at the same identical speed as the wheels are rolling with the jet at full throttle, part throttle,or half throttle, the plane won't take off, and the conveyor doesn't have to be much longer than the wheelbase of the plane, because it won't roll off it under thrust. It won't take off because the plane isn't gaining any lift.

Clear as mud.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 06:53 PM
  #275  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by Tumba
I was trying to think of an example to help him understand and~

Put the airplane on pontoons. It is now in a river and you are on an ajacent bank. The river then starts flowing at 40 mph,the airplane is now drifting down river and it will take 40 mph thrust just to stay even with you on the bank. 0 airspeed


stealth you're tough and also right
What's a pontoon?
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 07:06 PM
  #276  
Tumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 1
From: >wwOwww<
Originally Posted by Stealth
What's a pontoon?
I thought that sounded better than floats.
everyone knows what a pontoon boat is!
you know that place in the middle of the lake that has all the beer
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 08:41 PM
  #277  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by Tumba
I thought that sounded better than floats.
everyone knows what a pontoon boat is!
you know that place in the middle of the lake that has all the beer
Oh yeah.

 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 09:16 PM
  #278  
Tumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 1
From: >wwOwww<
Originally Posted by Stealth
Oh yeah.


how'd ya git my pikture
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 09:17 PM
  #279  
Larry227's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in the Kootenays
Originally Posted by Stealth
OK, I see the problem here.

Our discussions are about two different things. One is about a plane traveling against a conveyor and overpowering it and taking off. Yes it will take off, just like the MB episode, though their conclusion was highly unscientific.

What I'm saying is in direct correlation to the OP's original statement, which is completely different than that which some you are discussing.

If the conveyor is travelling at the same identical speed as the wheels are rolling with the jet at full throttle, part throttle,or half throttle, the plane won't take off, and the conveyor doesn't have to be much longer than the wheelbase of the plane, because it won't roll off it under thrust. It won't take off because the plane isn't gaining any lift.

Clear as mud.
I think you hit the nail on the head. People are confusing the plane moving with power to the wheels which there is none. The plane HAS to move before it can generate lift via airflow. If the conveyor keeps it from moving it doesn't matter if it's on wheels, pontoons, skis or dragging it's belly on the ground, it's not going to take off. Now if it's levitating above the conveyor to begin with then that's different. But that's not how the original question was worded. It asks if the conveyor matches the speed of the plane will it take off. Well, no. Matching speeds means 0 forward speed = no take off. Busted.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #280  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by Larry227
I think you hit the nail on the head. People are confusing the plane moving with power to the wheels which there is none. The plane HAS to move before it can generate lift via airflow. If the conveyor keeps it from moving it doesn't matter if it's on wheels, pontoons, skis or dragging it's belly on the ground, it's not going to take off. Now if it's levitating above the conveyor to begin with then that's different. But that's not how the original question was worded. It asks if the conveyor matches the speed of the plane will it take off. Well, no. Matching speeds means 0 forward speed = no take off. Busted.
I knew I wasn't stupid.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 09:25 PM
  #281  
Tumba's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 1
From: >wwOwww<
I haven't seen the mythbusters but i know alot of their shows are flawed but they do entertain
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 09:48 PM
  #282  
Peacemaker's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
Shiat. I always pictured a jet sitting on a conveyor belt about the length of the jet itself, in my mind. Now if the conveyor is a mile long, yes, it will take off. Now why didn't they add that little tidbit of info into the equation when they asked the mother frickin' question!?!? If you're going to ask a half assed question, you'll get a half assed answer. Which is 50/50. Some people say yes, some people say no. Then they argue about it. Whoever asked this question is getting a kick out of all of this I'm sure.
 

Last edited by Peacemaker; Feb 2, 2008 at 09:51 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 10:01 PM
  #283  
Pheonixx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
planes dont stand...
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 10:05 PM
  #284  
Oxlander's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Marshall, Tx
Originally Posted by Larry227
I think you hit the nail on the head. People are confusing the plane moving with power to the wheels which there is none. The plane HAS to move before it can generate lift via airflow. If the conveyor keeps it from moving it doesn't matter if it's on wheels, pontoons, skis or dragging it's belly on the ground, it's not going to take off. Now if it's levitating above the conveyor to begin with then that's different. But that's not how the original question was worded. It asks if the conveyor matches the speed of the plane will it take off. Well, no. Matching speeds means 0 forward speed = no take off. Busted.
The speed of the conveyor belt is NOT being transfered into the plane's fuselage but rather into the plane's wheels which are connected to the aircraft via a free floating bearing system. The plane will advance along the length of the conveyor belt, developing airspeed as it travels, thus creating lift. There is NO canceling of forward momentum.

And for what its worth, the wheels are NOT turning backwards. The direction of movement by the conveyor belt mimics that of the ground as if the plane was traveling along a fixed runway.

Stealth,
The means of creating propulsion for both a turbo prop and a jet engine are vastly different but the results are the the same. They both create thrust which propels the aircraft forward (unless reverse thrusters are applied). So it really doesn't matter what type of engine is on the plane, both would work equally well in this scenario.

The reason why aircraft carriers opted to use a steam catapult rather than a conveyor belt system is simple. In order to launch an aircraft using a conveyor belt, the belt's length would need to be equal to that of a fixed runway. Contrast this with the steam catapult that can generate extreme airspeed in a fraction of the distance.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 11:19 PM
  #285  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
You're missing the point about the OP's original conveyor idea, how the jet moves at the same speed as the conveyor, therefore cancelling out all forward momentum. If the plane is moving forward on a conveyor that is moving against the jet at the same speed, the plane will act as if it is not moving forward at all, therefore it will not lift off. The conveyor does not have to be but a bit longer than the actual wheelbase of the plane, because the plane won't move anywhere.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 PM.