deer hunter safety.
He not only shot the guy shooting at him.. he shot a few others too..
Like you said, I pray Im never ina situation like that either... its hsard to distinguish between murder and self defence in that situation.
Some could say that "The guy didnt shoot at him.. just near him too scare him, so its murder"... Some could say that He shot at him and he responded in self defence.. Real iffy situation
Like you said, I pray Im never ina situation like that either... its hsard to distinguish between murder and self defence in that situation.
Some could say that "The guy didnt shoot at him.. just near him too scare him, so its murder"... Some could say that He shot at him and he responded in self defence.. Real iffy situation
NEVER SHOOT AT ANY LIVING THING UNLESSS YOU ARE PREPARED TO TAKE IT HOME AND EAT IT!! That's lesson # 1.
SHOOT TO KILL! Lesson #2.
If you can't follow these 2 simple rules, sell, destroy or bury your weapons.
SHOOT TO KILL! Lesson #2.
If you can't follow these 2 simple rules, sell, destroy or bury your weapons.
Originally Posted by northernnorm
NEVER SHOOT AT ANY LIVING THING UNLESSS YOU ARE PREPARED TO TAKE IT HOME AND EAT IT!! That's lesson # 1.
SHOOT TO KILL! Lesson #2.
If you can't follow these 2 simple rules, sell, destroy or bury your weapons.

SHOOT TO KILL! Lesson #2.
If you can't follow these 2 simple rules, sell, destroy or bury your weapons.

Yea well.....you eat your intruder....I'll just send mine to the morgue.
If Someone shoots at me they better hit me cuz they aint gonna get a chance 2 shoot back i truely believe in self defense i dont believe in tresspassing though and i can understand the guy painting his cows because so many people with no common sense at all are in the woods hunting now days its sad to see such a wonder sport go to the point where it is dangerous i only hunt on private land with responsible people who know and understand firearms
Originally Posted by northernnorm
NEVER SHOOT AT ANY LIVING THING UNLESSS YOU ARE PREPARED TO TAKE IT HOME AND EAT IT!! That's lesson # 1.
SHOOT TO KILL! Lesson #2.
If you can't follow these 2 simple rules, sell, destroy or bury your weapons.

SHOOT TO KILL! Lesson #2.
If you can't follow these 2 simple rules, sell, destroy or bury your weapons.

The second lesson is a good one though.
I'm not a hunter myself, but see nothing wrong with it. I come from a long line of hunters, just never took up the interest. Fishing's another story.
My favorite two bumperstickers:
PETA - People Eating Tasty Animals
and
Why do they call it Tourist Season if you can't shoot 'em.
My favorite two bumperstickers:
PETA - People Eating Tasty Animals
and
Why do they call it Tourist Season if you can't shoot 'em.
Originally Posted by buckdropper
not the same weapons at all totally different. Mine is a .50 cal ap bolt action shooting 662 grain amour percing tracer rounds (thats all i could find) up to and beyound 1000 yards. Not legal for hunting anywhere (except iraq). it weighs in at 47.6 lbs and cost is over 3,500$
In Indiana squirrel, "may be taken with any equipment and ammunition during squirrel hunting season."
But if you hit a squirrel with a .50 BMG, the tail might survive
Originally Posted by khendrix2374
That's not entirely correct.... Im gonna have to go back and re-read what ACTUALLY happened.. but best I recall..
A group of hunters came across this guy, who coult speak english WELL, who they'd asked to leave their property once before. They told him to leave again and he complied with no incodent. The hunters then began yelling racial slurs at him while he was walking away. Still, he complied. Then one of the hunters shot *at* him... not shooting to kill him, just to scare him. The bullet hit the ground beside him. Then he turned around and murdered the initial shooter and a few others...
So... He *shouldnt* have killed them, but they REALLY shouldnt have shot at him.
I dunno the final verdict of the case.. it was on court TV about a month ago.
A group of hunters came across this guy, who coult speak english WELL, who they'd asked to leave their property once before. They told him to leave again and he complied with no incodent. The hunters then began yelling racial slurs at him while he was walking away. Still, he complied. Then one of the hunters shot *at* him... not shooting to kill him, just to scare him. The bullet hit the ground beside him. Then he turned around and murdered the initial shooter and a few others...
So... He *shouldnt* have killed them, but they REALLY shouldnt have shot at him.
I dunno the final verdict of the case.. it was on court TV about a month ago.
All told, I think he shot 8 people, but 2 lived. If I recall correctly, one of the people shot was a 15 year old boy. He was convicted on 6 counts of murder. I hadn't heard the that he was hot at first, but I'm sure that was something the defense claimed to save his @ss.
If everyone followd the 2 rules I posted earlier, you would only be shooting at FOOD. Unless you're
a cannibal.
Now when it comes to self defense, that's different. Just make sure that you are in your bedroom, otherwise it's murder. At least in Canada. Where the Liberals now want to ban ALL hand guns. Bastards!!! 3 guesses who I WONT be voting for in January/06
a cannibal.Now when it comes to self defense, that's different. Just make sure that you are in your bedroom, otherwise it's murder. At least in Canada. Where the Liberals now want to ban ALL hand guns. Bastards!!! 3 guesses who I WONT be voting for in January/06
Originally Posted by mkinttrim
A rancher out here in Colorado did that after losing 3 head of cattle the year before. He's not a dumb F@%#, the person behing the scope that can't tell the difference between a cow and a bull elk is!
Then you are the worst thing on this earth,!!



