deer hunter safety.
Originally Posted by Photog95
I don't think that would pass then. I think we can use .50 in black powder though but it just wouldn't be the same. 


:santa:
Last edited by buckdropper; Nov 29, 2005 at 11:42 PM.
A rancher out here in Colorado did that after losing 3 head of cattle the year before. He's not a dumb F@%#, the person behing the scope that can't tell the difference between a cow and a bull elk is!
not the same weapons at all totally different. Mine is a .50 cal ap bolt action shooting 662 grain amour percing tracer rounds (thats all i could find) up to and beyound 1000 yards. Not legal for hunting anywhere (except iraq). it weighs in at 47.6 lbs and cost is over 3,500$
WOW! That's a heavy gun. lol...Typo right?
WOW! That's a heavy gun. lol...Typo right?
Originally Posted by Photog95
over a tree stand. Some moron from MN who couldn't even speak english came into WI and was trespassing on private property. This group of hunters kicked him out of one of their stands. Never even asked him to vacate the property, just the stand. He left for a while and came back and murdered the whole group.


A group of hunters came across this guy, who coult speak english WELL, who they'd asked to leave their property once before. They told him to leave again and he complied with no incodent. The hunters then began yelling racial slurs at him while he was walking away. Still, he complied. Then one of the hunters shot *at* him... not shooting to kill him, just to scare him. The bullet hit the ground beside him. Then he turned around and murdered the initial shooter and a few others...
So... He *shouldnt* have killed them, but they REALLY shouldnt have shot at him.
I dunno the final verdict of the case.. it was on court TV about a month ago.
instead of orange paint the old farmer should have gotten some of those reflective triangles that go on trash trucks and tractors and "attached" them to the cows instead
...zap!
...zap!
Originally Posted by khendrix2374
That's not entirely correct.... Im gonna have to go back and re-read what ACTUALLY happened.. but best I recall..
A group of hunters came across this guy, who coult speak english WELL, who they'd asked to leave their property once before. They told him to leave again and he complied with no incodent. The hunters then began yelling racial slurs at him while he was walking away. Still, he complied. Then one of the hunters shot *at* him... not shooting to kill him, just to scare him. The bullet hit the ground beside him. Then he turned around and murdered the initial shooter and a few others...
So... He *shouldnt* have killed them, but they REALLY shouldnt have shot at him.
I dunno the final verdict of the case.. it was on court TV about a month ago.
A group of hunters came across this guy, who coult speak english WELL, who they'd asked to leave their property once before. They told him to leave again and he complied with no incodent. The hunters then began yelling racial slurs at him while he was walking away. Still, he complied. Then one of the hunters shot *at* him... not shooting to kill him, just to scare him. The bullet hit the ground beside him. Then he turned around and murdered the initial shooter and a few others...
So... He *shouldnt* have killed them, but they REALLY shouldnt have shot at him.
I dunno the final verdict of the case.. it was on court TV about a month ago.
Originally Posted by khendrix2374
That's not entirely correct.... Im gonna have to go back and re-read what ACTUALLY happened.. but best I recall..
A group of hunters came across this guy, who coult speak english WELL, who they'd asked to leave their property once before. They told him to leave again and he complied with no incodent. The hunters then began yelling racial slurs at him while he was walking away. Still, he complied. Then one of the hunters shot *at* him... not shooting to kill him, just to scare him. The bullet hit the ground beside him. Then he turned around and murdered the initial shooter and a few others...
So... He *shouldnt* have killed them, but they REALLY shouldnt have shot at him.
I dunno the final verdict of the case.. it was on court TV about a month ago.
A group of hunters came across this guy, who coult speak english WELL, who they'd asked to leave their property once before. They told him to leave again and he complied with no incodent. The hunters then began yelling racial slurs at him while he was walking away. Still, he complied. Then one of the hunters shot *at* him... not shooting to kill him, just to scare him. The bullet hit the ground beside him. Then he turned around and murdered the initial shooter and a few others...
So... He *shouldnt* have killed them, but they REALLY shouldnt have shot at him.
I dunno the final verdict of the case.. it was on court TV about a month ago.
Your version may be more correct than mine. I am from WI and it happened here in WI so the WI reporters probably left out all the bad crap that the WI hunters did to deserve what they got. We all know how the press works to twist things to make it a better story for the people that they need to work with later.
Very true. The press DOES twist fact around to sound good in the papers.
That is what I heard/seen on Court TV about the case.
I dont know what I would have done in his situation. I would want to turn around and shoot the guy shooting at me, but... THATS MURDER!.. I dont know.. How I'm never in a situation like that.
That is what I heard/seen on Court TV about the case.
I dont know what I would have done in his situation. I would want to turn around and shoot the guy shooting at me, but... THATS MURDER!.. I dont know.. How I'm never in a situation like that.
Corpse of man had been mistaken for deer
FRANKLIN, Pa. - Police said a man who died after being struck by a vehicle may have been left on a roadside for days because his body was apparently mistaken for a dead deer.
The man was found on Monday by a motorist, who at first thought the man was a deer because of tan clothing and snow that covered part of his body. The motorist realized the man wasn't a deer after noticing his shoes, police said.
Authorities believe that many others drove past the body, assuming it was a deer.
The man was a passenger in a vehicle that wrecked last Friday. Police say he'd been walking along the road when he was hit and killed by another vehicle.
Originally Posted by khendrix2374
Very true. The press DOES twist fact around to sound good in the papers.
That is what I heard/seen on Court TV about the case.
I dont know what I would have done in his situation. I would want to turn around and shoot the guy shooting at me, but... THATS MURDER!.. I dont know.. How I'm never in a situation like that.
That is what I heard/seen on Court TV about the case.
I dont know what I would have done in his situation. I would want to turn around and shoot the guy shooting at me, but... THATS MURDER!.. I dont know.. How I'm never in a situation like that.



I'm sure spray paint can't be all that healthy.