Presidential Debates (VP's)
#1
Presidential Debates (VP's)
OK, we all know Kerry will go undefeated in the Presidential Debates; the wild card is the Vice-Presidential debates. **** is slicker than a greasy eel in a barrel of 40-weight oil- and can dance around issues like Fred Astaire danced aroudn the stage; yet- he can do so in a manner that doesn't seem evasive.
I've never heard Edwards speak; he'll have to be good to out speak ****. If he can stay even with ****, or pull off an upset and win that'll be another nail in the 2nd-term coffin.
Who else is gonna watch?
I've never heard Edwards speak; he'll have to be good to out speak ****. If he can stay even with ****, or pull off an upset and win that'll be another nail in the 2nd-term coffin.
Who else is gonna watch?
#2
VP debate will be similiar to your last new car purchase.
Edwards will appear as a car salesman, telling what great things are possible, the options available to you, how good you'll look in Red with leather.
Cheney will remind you of the Finance Manager, looking intently through the top of his glasses, speaking in a factual monotone, he will define your credit rating, explain the rate you got, add undercoating and generally make you squirm in your seat. You'll sign anything to escape.
Edwards will appear as a car salesman, telling what great things are possible, the options available to you, how good you'll look in Red with leather.
Cheney will remind you of the Finance Manager, looking intently through the top of his glasses, speaking in a factual monotone, he will define your credit rating, explain the rate you got, add undercoating and generally make you squirm in your seat. You'll sign anything to escape.
#3
I was thinking tht Edwards skills as a trial lawyer would serve him well in the debates but I heard that a lot of his big cases were settled out of court so maybe he dosn't have as much courtroom experience as I expected. If you are looking for an actual debate where both participants have a shot at looking like they belong in a debate, well this might be the one. Dirty **** Cheney has been around the block a few times and knows the game so I'm giving him an edge. They both have a weasly edge to them, corrupt big business tycoon vs greedy ambulance chaser, has a nice ring to it.
be careful Raoul, you might get sucked back into this blackhole of politically charged threads. I'm trying to stay out of the ranting threads but it is hard.
be careful Raoul, you might get sucked back into this blackhole of politically charged threads. I'm trying to stay out of the ranting threads but it is hard.
Last edited by fatman66; 10-05-2004 at 12:54 PM.
#4
Originally posted by fatman66
...be careful Raoul, you might get sucked back into this blackhole of politically charged threads. I'm trying to stay out of the ranting threads but it is hard.
...be careful Raoul, you might get sucked back into this blackhole of politically charged threads. I'm trying to stay out of the ranting threads but it is hard.
When the verbal battles begin, the very positioning of your post could get you in trouble so, I exclude myself when it starts.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
I think Chaney know's more about the system than Edwards, but peoples view will favor Edwards more (and he will help the Democrats more than Chaney will help the Republicans) and thus he wont have to be as sharp as chaney needs to be.
I'm gonna go ahead and give Chaney the win though!!!
Raoul, Fat Joe called your name out in "lean Back" how you gonna respond to that???
I'm gonna go ahead and give Chaney the win though!!!
Raoul, Fat Joe called your name out in "lean Back" how you gonna respond to that???
#11
Personally, Edwards is the only person I really care for in the entire presidential race. I've got my doubts to some extent about everyone else involved. (I feel like we're choosing between the lesser of two evils once again as opposed to voting for a candidate I am actually behind) It's hard to believe in this entire great country of ours that these are the two best choices we can put forwards! Edwards on the other hand (although it could be argued he is fairly inexpierenced) came from very humble beginnings and to a great extent seems to have put himself where he is at on his own. Cheney is extremely expierenced, and extremely uncharismatic. Edwards is extremely unexpierenced, but very charismatic. Should be a good debate.
Last edited by STX/98; 10-05-2004 at 03:28 PM.
#12
#13
A lot of good points...
I'll say one thing though: Unless you were Vice-President then become President- there is no way you can ever be "prepared" for the job of President. You just better make darn sure you have the right people in your corner, behind you and in your cabinet.
It sounds like it's gonna be good.
I'll say one thing though: Unless you were Vice-President then become President- there is no way you can ever be "prepared" for the job of President. You just better make darn sure you have the right people in your corner, behind you and in your cabinet.
It sounds like it's gonna be good.
#14