Exhaust & Intake Systems
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Most Powerful Intake...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 09:52 AM
  #61  
05supercrew's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,071
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Isnt the air that travels though the intake tube moving quick enough to not really be effected by the temp of the tube reguardless of the material it is made of. Im sure there are some variables but nothing anyone will notice. Thats just my thought, please correct me if im wrong.
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 10:43 AM
  #62  
fbuckfiddy's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
You might be right in that there wouldn't be much difference, however, *IF* all else were equal, why not just pick the material with lower thermal conductivity?

Of course there are other variables to consider, so the companies that use metals have chosen a higher thermal conductivity material for other reasons, for example:

Perhaps investing in several different $xx,000 molds to make plastic tubes is too expensive for a hot rodder with an idea to stick a filter on the end of a tube. It would be much easier and less expensive to go to his muffler shop friend to bend a metal tube and slap a filter on the end of it, an idea is born...the stainless steel intake system!

Perhaps they then made a couple prototypes and then they said, "Hey, let's polish or powder coat these metal tubes to make them look desireable and sell them to our friends".


Originally Posted by 05supercrew
Isnt the air that travels though the intake tube moving quick enough to not really be effected by the temp of the tube reguardless of the material it is made of. Im sure there are some variables but nothing anyone will notice. Thats just my thought, please correct me if im wrong.
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 01:00 PM
  #63  
GerRod's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Originally Posted by Marc Carpenter
When we were testing the stainless, aluminum and composite intake tubes we shot the temps with a temp gun and the difference was a whopping 6 degrees, with the stainless being warmer than the composite or aluminum, however the composite and the aluminum were quicker to heat up than the stainless.
Just what I thought, negligible...90 F plastic intake, 96 F stainless intake...

Originally Posted by fbuckfiddy

Perhaps investing in several different $xx,000 molds to make plastic tubes is too expensive for a hot rodder with an idea to stick a filter on the end of a tube. It would be much easier and less expensive to go to his muffler shop friend to bend a metal tube and slap a filter on the end of it, an idea is born...the stainless steel intake system!

.
After the initial mold setup, the price would be far cheaper to mass produce plastic tubes as opposed to bending, polishing, and welding the MAF sensor tap to stainless ones...

Another important factor to consider is the velocity of air going into the engine...Velocity is impacted by inner wall surface, angle of bend in the tube, and intake openings at the filter...
 
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #64  
Bartak1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,760
Likes: 4
From: Nebraska
Who cares about intake temp really? Of course, cooler air is nicer, but if the intake that is pulling in HOTTER air is making MORE power, than does air temp mean a darn thing really?

Arent we all looking for more power?, not bragging about how low our intake temps are?

Just seems inmaterial to me...
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 04:43 AM
  #65  
knuckleuppunk's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Blaster1420
I know that's what your website says but I called last week to confirm that and check for vendors that would be stocking that unit and was told not to expect anything for my truck for AT LEAST 90 days but that it would probably be more than that.

Maybe whomever I talked to is misinformed or is just out of the loop R & D wise, doknow. I don't remember his name either.

Cool though
The easiest way to find stuff out about our current or upcoming products is to ask for directly. (Jay)
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 05:20 AM
  #66  
knuckleuppunk's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
As I stated in my earlier post inside this thread, I had previously posted quite a bit of information regarding the thermal properties of Stainless, Aluminum, and Polyethylene. haulin79 suggested a great link too. In fact, it was one that I used in an earlier post on this subject as well. The information is out there, you just have to find it.

All of the questions that keep getting asked (for the most part) have already been answered elsewhere in this forum. Check out the links below to learn more on the subject of cold air intakes, the difference in filter media being used, the importance on properly cleaning and oiling a filter, plus other useful info.

Remember - I'll answer as many questions as possible and always give a truthful answer, regardless if it shows a weakness in the S&B product line. If I don't respond to this forum quickly enough, anyone here can contact me directly as well.

Open Element Systems vs Closed Element Systems

Open Element Systems vs Closed Element Systems PT2

Quick facts on measuring actual air temp inside an intake

"Dry" or Non-oiled Air Filters

The Truth about Dyno Testing

Bottom of post talks about properly cleaning and oiling an air filter

Tuning an intake system by controlling air flow velocity and MAF readings


Originally Posted by Blaster1420
I know that's what your website says but I called last week to confirm that and check for vendors that would be stocking that unit and was told not to expect anything for my truck for AT LEAST 90 days but that it would probably be more than that.

Maybe whomever I talked to is misinformed or is just out of the loop R & D wise, doknow. I don't remember his name either.

Cool though
The easiest way to receive information about our current and/or upcoming products is to ask for me directly (Jay) when you call. In fact, you're more than welcome to email me directly as well. My address is located inside the post that I linked below. I'm trying to avoid the obvious spam associated with posting an email address on a forum, so you'll have to decipher the address.

How to email me


I'm sure that this post will stir things up, but if you read all the posts I linked above and also search the internet to confirm the information, you'll find that I'm speaking the truth...and the truth is something that is badly missing in the cold air intake / air filter industry.

Cheers!
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 04:55 PM
  #67  
chester8420's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, Georgia
Originally Posted by Blaster1420
I don't understand why everybody is talking about which material dissipates heat better or worse than another. What we should really be concerned with is which tubes insulate their interiors from heat better than the other because they're really two completely different issues. Obviously the heat under the hood is typically higher than that of the higher velocity air traveling through the intake pipe so do we want dissipation between the two temp. differentials or insulation? Somebody here was relating good intake construction material to heat sink material because of its good heat displacement benefits. Who wants that? Do we want the intake air to match that of the engine comparptment as Soon As Possible? Negative. What else is there to dissipate than the heat from the engine into the tube through some super heat conductor (like heat sink aluminum) Or do you want to dissipate the cool air into the warmer environment??? Either way it's counter-productive to what CAIs are advertised to achieve. Insulation, insulation, insulation is what you should be spending your energy on.
FINALLY !! Somebody here that thinks for themself. Just because it's shiny and costs a fortune doesn't mean it gives your truck more horsepower. But again, we're only talking MINUTE differences.
 

Last edited by chester8420; Feb 14, 2007 at 05:00 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #68  
chester8420's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, Georgia
Originally Posted by GerRod
Another important factor to consider is the velocity of air going into the engine...Velocity is impacted by inner wall surface, angle of bend in the tube, and intake openings at the filter...
Yeah, velocity... But velocity isn't as important to horsepower as QUANTITY! And the lower the lower temp at ANY GIVEN PRESSURE equals MORE AIR! Hence an intercooler. Yes, they might decrease velocity, but INCREASE horsepower, because they INCREASE the quantity of air in the combustion chamber.
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 05:46 PM
  #69  
openclasspro#11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
From: North Huntingdon,Pa.
?

Originally Posted by chester8420
Yeah, velocity... But velocity isn't as important to horsepower as QUANTITY! And the lower the lower temp at ANY GIVEN PRESSURE equals MORE AIR! Hence an intercooler. Yes, they might decrease velocity, but INCREASE horsepower, because they INCREASE the quantity of air in the combustion chamber.
velocity is important to hp on the exhaust side- so why isn't it on the intake side?-case in point- ram air systems on sportbikes
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 07:03 PM
  #70  
chester8420's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, Georgia
Originally Posted by openclasspro#11
velocity is important to hp on the exhaust side- so why isn't it on the intake side?-case in point- ram air systems on sportbikes
Putting a larger diameter intake hose decreases velocity. What's your point?

When your piston rides down, air goes into the void. The higher the pressure in your intake manifold, the higher the pressure will be in your cylinders. It's that simple. Kinda....
 

Last edited by chester8420; Feb 14, 2007 at 07:05 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 11:25 PM
  #71  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
Oh great... here we go again.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 01:26 AM
  #72  
knuckleuppunk's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by openclasspro#11
velocity is important to hp on the exhaust side- so why isn't it on the intake side?-case in point- ram air systems on sportbikes
I really like where you're going with this, as I'm a sportbike fan and owner, but try not to confuse positive pressure inside a "ram air" air box for actual airflow velocity. Ram Air systems force air into a sealed box to create positive pressure or "boost" and the airflow velocity will be affected by the negative pressure drop created after the power stroke.



Originally Posted by chester8420
Putting a larger diameter intake hose decreases velocity. What's your point?

When your piston rides down, air goes into the void. The higher the pressure in your intake manifold, the higher the pressure will be in your cylinders. It's that simple. Kinda....
I might get slammed for this, but you're actually correct. Granted, your post is extremely simple and vague, but it is correct nonetheless.
 
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 02:01 PM
  #73  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
well A squared + B squared doesnt = D squared... So cold air intakes are really confusing hu?
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2007 | 03:17 AM
  #74  
chester8420's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, Georgia
Originally Posted by knuckleuppunk
I might get slammed for this, but you're actually correct. Granted, your post is extremely simple and vague, but it is correct nonetheless.
The whole concept of intakes, exhaust, and their effects on horsepower are VERY simple. Now torque on the other hand is a little harder to understand and relate.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2007 | 05:41 PM
  #75  
openclasspro#11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
From: North Huntingdon,Pa.
?

[QUOTE=chester8420]Putting a larger diameter intake hose decreases velocity. What's your point?

When your piston rides down, air goes into the void. The higher the pressure in your intake manifold, the higher the pressure will be in your cylinders. It's that simple.
you said velocity isn't important to horsepower as quantity-who on God's green earth told you that-
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:57 PM.