87 vs 93 tune for better mpgs?
Did you happen to check out the link I posted earlier?
I've got my 5.4 (2002 F150 SuperCrew) on 87 with a SuperTuner. I didn't notice a mpg difference until 2 weeks ago I decided to max out the psi in my tires (stock goodyears) @ 35psi. My mileage went up over 1mpg, last tank was best ever @ 15.8mpg. The other thing I'm doing at the pump is pumping very slow, using either the first click on the nozzle or holding it to pump slow. By doing this I've noticed I'm not pumping as much gas as I used to. If I filled up at half tank, by holding the nozzle full open, it would be at least 18 gallons. Now I'm pumping 14.5 gallons. Just goes to show how much air you are paying for by pumping fast....Just my $.02
Mike C
Mike C
That was a great link, rch!
And, Thumper, I'd expect high octane gas to actually burn "dirtier", since it burns slower. Sure, we compensate a bit for that with increased timing, but we can't do anything about the compression. Therefore, I'd expect a higher hydrocarbon reading in the exhaust using high octane gas. You reach a limit on timing advance, and I think that happens too soon for complete combustion.
I also don't see why high octane gas would be kinder to injectors either.
And, wouldn't unburned hydrocarbons tend to "carbon up" the cylinders and spark plugs more too? (Leading to the famous "breaking plugs" problem when they are changed)?
These are just questions. I'm certainly no expert! But, I read a lot and EVERYTHING I've ever read or heard from reputable sources say don't use gas having a higher octane rating than your engine needs.
I also appreciate that using high octane gas with advanced timing gives more power. (Since it gives a nice, controlled "push" on the piston during the downstroke rather than a harder, faster, explosion). If that's what you're after, fine!
- Jack
And, Thumper, I'd expect high octane gas to actually burn "dirtier", since it burns slower. Sure, we compensate a bit for that with increased timing, but we can't do anything about the compression. Therefore, I'd expect a higher hydrocarbon reading in the exhaust using high octane gas. You reach a limit on timing advance, and I think that happens too soon for complete combustion.
I also don't see why high octane gas would be kinder to injectors either.
And, wouldn't unburned hydrocarbons tend to "carbon up" the cylinders and spark plugs more too? (Leading to the famous "breaking plugs" problem when they are changed)?
These are just questions. I'm certainly no expert! But, I read a lot and EVERYTHING I've ever read or heard from reputable sources say don't use gas having a higher octane rating than your engine needs.
I also appreciate that using high octane gas with advanced timing gives more power. (Since it gives a nice, controlled "push" on the piston during the downstroke rather than a harder, faster, explosion). If that's what you're after, fine!
- Jack
So, those thinking they will get a little of both worlds, performance and economy by taking the middle road and ordering a 89 tune and running 89 octane is pointless? its either 87 or 93. why are 89 tunes offered? just asking because i was about to order the 89 tunes cause I dont want to pay for 93 unless its worth while. performance and $$ in the long
Kyle - the octane rating or "knock" rating has NOTHING to do with performance or economy. It is merely the formula required to run your motor without "pinging". I won't get into pre or post detonation or timing or compression or all the other things that DO affect performance and economy...but if your truck was built to run on 87, anything else is a waste of $$$.
There is a link above that gives a decent explaination of high performance vehicles and fuel. It's worth a read and there are other sites that explain, in great detail, why 93 is NOT better for a motor than 87. That's another thread though.
There is a link above that gives a decent explaination of high performance vehicles and fuel. It's worth a read and there are other sites that explain, in great detail, why 93 is NOT better for a motor than 87. That's another thread though.
Kyle - the octane rating or "knock" rating has NOTHING to do with performance or economy. It is merely the formula required to run your motor without "pinging". I won't get into pre or post detonation or timing or compression or all the other things that DO affect performance and economy...but if your truck was built to run on 87, anything else is a waste of $$$.
There is a link above that gives a decent explaination of high performance vehicles and fuel. It's worth a read and there are other sites that explain, in great detail, why 93 is NOT better for a motor than 87. That's another thread though.
There is a link above that gives a decent explaination of high performance vehicles and fuel. It's worth a read and there are other sites that explain, in great detail, why 93 is NOT better for a motor than 87. That's another thread though.
We can argue all day long about this and that but the answer is cut and dry.
87 vs 93 tune for better mpgs?
I don't believe 93 burns any slower, but rather has a higher resistance to knock than 87.
In some vehicles running 93 will allow the computer to advance timing slightly, and add a little power, but not as much as you would get from a full blown premium fuel tune.
In some vehicles running 93 will allow the computer to advance timing slightly, and add a little power, but not as much as you would get from a full blown premium fuel tune.
I run 87, gas prices for 91 are way too ridiculous in CA right now. I drive mostly highway, and on the 87 tune (highway only) i am consistently getting between 18.6 and 19.2 MPG on my 87 Troyer Performance Tune. I keep it at or below 70mph the whole time.
I'm not sure that a designer of a 15:1 motor would tune for 87 - the engineering of the motor is what calls for the octane rating, not the other way around.
I've got my 5.4 (2002 F150 SuperCrew) on 87 with a SuperTuner. I didn't notice a mpg difference until 2 weeks ago I decided to max out the psi in my tires (stock goodyears) @ 35psi. My mileage went up over 1mpg, last tank was best ever @ 15.8mpg. The other thing I'm doing at the pump is pumping very slow, using either the first click on the nozzle or holding it to pump slow. By doing this I've noticed I'm not pumping as much gas as I used to. If I filled up at half tank, by holding the nozzle full open, it would be at least 18 gallons. Now I'm pumping 14.5 gallons. Just goes to show how much air you are paying for by pumping fast....Just my $.02
Mike C
Mike C
Man I might have to expierement mith that.
Regardless of how fast you pump gas is not going to change the amount of gas you pump ... Think about that for a few seconds ... 
What are you talking about? 15:1?

What are you talking about? 15:1?
It IS a matter if it was built for 87 or not. Some motors are built to run 110 and you aren't going to tune them for 87.
The answer of 93 giving you more MPG's is NOT cut and dry. If you ran 87 in a motor that calls for 93 - you will see a drop in MPG but you don't get a gain by running 93 in a motor designed for 87. It doesn't work like that. Can you create a situation where it can - sure, but it ain't as a daily driver and therefore a moot point.
Does you car have a knock sensor? What do you think it's function is?
There is less energy in higher octane fuel and adjusting your timing is not going to net you an increase that you can measure.




