Programmer Is Coming Off!

Old Apr 23, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #1  
JRERACER26's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: VALRICO, FL.
Programmer Is Coming Off!

I PICKED A FINE TIME TO INSTALL MY SUPERCHIPS POWER PROGRAMMER, JUST AS THE GAS PRICES ROSE TO OVER $3.00 A GALLON FOR 93. IS THERE A BIG PERFORMANCE DECREASE IF I REPROGRAM TO THE 87 SETTING? AT $75.00 TO FILL MY TANK, I COULD REALLY CARE LESS ABOUT PERFORMANCE!
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 07:09 PM
  #2  
BlueScrew4.6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: New Bern, NC
93 is worth the price...

So, assuming that you fill up 25 gallons per fill-up...instead of paying $75 for a tank of gas, you'll be paying $70? The difference in gas price is from regular to premium usually hovers at about a $.20 or so (from what I've seen at gas stations from Eastern NC all the way up to Central VA). I've got my 93 tune loaded up and even as the gas prices climb, I probably won't switch back to 87 anytime soon. Increased performance and horsepower is worth the $5 per tank to me. Just my humble opinion...and everyone knows what they say about opinions. But in any case, you have to do what you and your wallet deem necessary. Happy driving.
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 07:11 PM
  #3  
Kool Aid's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN.
Higher octane means you can run more timing, which increases gas mileage......so it should be a wash on the expense.

It is for me.

 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #4  
jpdadeo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,409
Likes: 1
From: Sunny FL
Don’t let the price of gas ruin your driving experience. I run 93-octane exclusively because that’s where the power is. The extra fin I pay at the pump is well worth it IMO
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 09:58 PM
  #5  
F150Truck'in's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 1
From: Chesterfield,Va.
Originally Posted by JRERACER26
I PICKED A FINE TIME TO INSTALL MY SUPERCHIPS POWER PROGRAMMER, JUST AS THE GAS PRICES ROSE TO OVER $3.00 A GALLON FOR 93. IS THERE A BIG PERFORMANCE DECREASE IF I REPROGRAM TO THE 87 SETTING? AT $75.00 TO FILL MY TANK, I COULD REALLY CARE LESS ABOUT PERFORMANCE!
Buck up and pay the 5.00, you have spend money on your truck getting like you want it... getting it to run like you want..... its life.... cost money to play the game....
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 10:55 PM
  #6  
Johnny A's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by JRERACER26
I PICKED A FINE TIME TO INSTALL MY SUPERCHIPS POWER PROGRAMMER, JUST AS THE GAS PRICES ROSE TO OVER $3.00 A GALLON FOR 93. IS THERE A BIG PERFORMANCE DECREASE IF I REPROGRAM TO THE 87 SETTING? AT $75.00 TO FILL MY TANK, I COULD REALLY CARE LESS ABOUT PERFORMANCE!
I am running a SCT chip 93 octane tune in my Expy. The company I work for now pays for all my gas. I was worried about the cost difference and what it would cost a year. So I compared the milieage I got with the tune verse the milieage I got without the tune. I do ALOT(up to 7hrs straight) of Hwy driving and ALOT of houston stop and go rush hour traffic. And the increase in the cost of the gas was way offset by the miliege. I swapped to 3:73 and still get 18-19 mpg if I can put it on cruise control at 75mph and not have hit the breaks other wise I get around 17mpg.
 

Last edited by Johnny A; Apr 23, 2006 at 11:00 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 08:20 AM
  #7  
rooster2005's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay
Do the math. It's 2¢ more per mile (or a little less) for premium assuming you get the same mileage. Be careful of accelerating too slowly. A near moderate acceleration will get you to cruising speed much faster than going 1/2 mile gradually. You will use less fuel accelerating moderately to cruise than you will with very slow acceleration for a much longer duration.

Just my opinion but consider that airliners get to fuel conserving cruise altitude without delay. It takes a lot of power but throttling back to cruise then reaps tremendous rewards. Fuel cost is their primary profit thief.

Maybe I can get a $25M gov't grant to study this for a month. That should cover the gas price if the speculators continue to operate without any oversight. It's the speculators causing the rising price of oil - not OPEC.

Petroleum should be protected from the crooks in NY!

http://futures.tradingcharts.com/hist_CO.html
 

Last edited by rooster2005; Apr 24, 2006 at 08:24 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 12:33 PM
  #8  
98Navi's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
I agree with these guys. You're talking about $5 per fillup, assuming once a week, thats $20 a month to get what it is we all desire. Try filling a 30 gallon tank at $3.09 (currently) $92.70 for the full monty. Then you can suffer some more with my current average of 9.4 miles per gallon which equates into right at 300 miles on a 30 gallon tank. And you don't hear me whinin about it, I knew exactly what I was getting into. Then again, there are those boys fillin up the diesels paying well over $100
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 12:50 PM
  #9  
khendrix2374's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
From: Murray , Kentucky
Get used to it. Gas prices will ONLY go up from here....
 
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 01:21 PM
  #10  
kdds05screw's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Back Woods of Chester Co PA
Return to driving the stock slug? No way man !!! 93 octane performance till the day it dies....
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 AM.