Why NOT k&n
#16
#17
Originally Posted by MGDfan
Hiya D;
Interesting position.
If you did that, would your 'Hemi-stomping' days be over?
I believe one of your concerns was heat retention, and the other, noise ?
Do you have any evidence to suggest K&N does better in those areas? From what I've read, the AF1 design exibited one of the lowest IAT rises of any aftermarket intake tested ( by Mike Troyer).
Interesting position.
If you did that, would your 'Hemi-stomping' days be over?
I believe one of your concerns was heat retention, and the other, noise ?
Do you have any evidence to suggest K&N does better in those areas? From what I've read, the AF1 design exibited one of the lowest IAT rises of any aftermarket intake tested ( by Mike Troyer).
Noise is a huge issue with me. It was the loudest, most obnoxious noise I've ever heard from an engine bay... After my first wave of sound proofing it's almost tolerable. A little more and it should be good. My tube is not shiney anymore due to the soundproofing.
As for the IAT temps... eh.. it doesn't matter what the tube is made out of. You can make it out of cardboard for pete's sake, with the volume of air that rushed through the tube at WOT cancel's out any effect of heat soak by the tube. The bigger concern is getting cooler air into the tube...
I'd get the K&N for the following reasons:
1. Build quality. I haven't seen or heard one bad thing about the K&N kits. No dremmeling this, smoothing that, trying to get this to line up whatever way. The AF1 wasn't horrid, but didn't exactly scream quality or well engineered. The details really hurt it's initial impression with me.
2. The K&N has GOT to be quieter. The laws of phyics say it must be due to the materials used for the intake tube.
3. K&N has been in the biz for 35 years. Well respected and have never disappionted me in the past. Everything about the AF1 has 'mom & pop' written all over it... the QC of the product, the website, everything...
Soooo... that's my impression. Yeah the AF1 puts out a few more ponies... but I'm just not sure the trade-offs are worth it. Plus the K&N is cheaper and several members love it, none have said anything bad about it (unlike the AF1).
That's my take. I'm no expert, just a nerd consumer.
#18
#19
That is another important point to look at which is the open filter in the engine bay. If it is sucking in air from the engine bay it will affect Ľ mile times negatively. It’s a simple fact that you will first suck in some hot air from the engine bay and hot air equals less horsepower. There is no data that states otherwise.
Now, within a few seconds you will get cooler air but in the Ľ mile or stop light to stop light you will lose time no other data to support otherwise.
Cold air intake systems are the best for performance and there is data to support that. Cold air intakes do not ever suck air from a hot engine bay. Even when you are moving you will normally always have air in the engine bay that is above ambient temperatures outside the engine bay.
Some simple data logging will back that up. Data log some city and highway driving with an under hood open element in the engine bay and compare that with data logging from a “true” cold air intake which gets all its air from outside the engine bay. The cold air system will always provide the most “average” horsepower and torque gains, there is no data to prove otherwise.
If you like a louder motor, and some people do, nothing wrong with that, go for the open element under the hood. If you are looking for true horsepower gains then you need to look at “true” cold air induction systems that never get their air from under the hood. The colder the air the more horsepower, that has always been true and will continue to be so just look at any professional racing circuit and one thing you will not find is open elements air induction systems sucking hot air from an engine compartment…
Now, within a few seconds you will get cooler air but in the Ľ mile or stop light to stop light you will lose time no other data to support otherwise.
Cold air intake systems are the best for performance and there is data to support that. Cold air intakes do not ever suck air from a hot engine bay. Even when you are moving you will normally always have air in the engine bay that is above ambient temperatures outside the engine bay.
Some simple data logging will back that up. Data log some city and highway driving with an under hood open element in the engine bay and compare that with data logging from a “true” cold air intake which gets all its air from outside the engine bay. The cold air system will always provide the most “average” horsepower and torque gains, there is no data to prove otherwise.
If you like a louder motor, and some people do, nothing wrong with that, go for the open element under the hood. If you are looking for true horsepower gains then you need to look at “true” cold air induction systems that never get their air from under the hood. The colder the air the more horsepower, that has always been true and will continue to be so just look at any professional racing circuit and one thing you will not find is open elements air induction systems sucking hot air from an engine compartment…
#20
Originally Posted by jpdadeo
The reason AF1 has more airflow is because it uses a bigger “power stack” filter. The K&N filter isn’t a “power stack” design and it’s smaller. Both filters are made out of the same cotton gauze material and both use oil to trap dirt.
That’s not to say an AF1 is going to hurt a motor. Also due to the larger volume or air is why is has a few more hp. It doesn’t really matter what tubes are made of etc. All you need to do to get a few more hp is to suck in more air.
Unless someone has a highly modified truck there is no rocket science behind air intakes and as stated the only reason an AF1 may have a few more hp is simple it allows more air into the motor.
However you could take that same AF1 open element filter and put it against a K&N drop in and I bet you would see equal hp or more hp from the drop in K&N simple because of having a cold air intake…
#21
#22
#25
#28
so Mike T you say that the *your* pick is the AF1...do you have any data to give ppl to show that the IAT temps are lower then any other intake setup? its your opinion that is the best but show customers why it is...sure the kit might have more hp on the dyno but how does it compare to other kits during normal day driving?
the average Joe sitting in traffic on hot day doesnt care how much hp he has and how purty it is if he is seeing 100+ IAT temps
the average Joe sitting in traffic on hot day doesnt care how much hp he has and how purty it is if he is seeing 100+ IAT temps
#29
Originally Posted by raider
so Mike T you say that the *your* pick is the AF1...do you have any data to give ppl to show that the IAT temps are lower then any other intake setup? its your opinion that is the best but show customers why it is...sure the kit might have more hp on the dyno but how does it compare to other kits during normal day driving?
the average Joe sitting in traffic on hot day doesnt care how much hp he has and how purty it is if he is seeing 100+ IAT temps
the average Joe sitting in traffic on hot day doesnt care how much hp he has and how purty it is if he is seeing 100+ IAT temps
#30