nxt and carnuba

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #16  
abervintageman4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 0
From: the woodlands tx
i did a small test area w/ just nxt and the water beads up pretty well
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 10:59 PM
  #17  
03gtmustang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
You should take a side by side picture of the beading with NXT and no LSP, or compare it to something else.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2008 | 11:00 PM
  #18  
abervintageman4's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 0
From: the woodlands tx
i will try to tommorow
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 01:02 AM
  #19  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,530
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
Originally Posted by 03gtmustang
So based on this thread, the looks of NXT arent that great? Hows the durability?
To me, NXT 2.0 by itself, 2 coats, not topped with carnauba, looks great. It seems so far to be VERY durable, if you use UQD after washing it almost makes it look like you just waxed it and it boosts the polymers.

For non-OCD'ers, I can honestly say that going right from clay to NXT 2.0 will satisfy most people out there. My stepdaughter and I did her 01 Catera this weekend - I clayed it for her, then handed her the ScratchX and told her to hit wherever she saw scratches while I took a nice break. When she was done I used NXT 2.0 while she did a complete interior detailing. She is **** about appearance but not quite OCD, and she was very impressed.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 04:58 AM
  #20  
roushstage2's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
From: CA
Originally Posted by RollingRock
I'll poke in for this one.

I think what we have here is semantic confusion and a little misinterpretation.

Anytime a Polish is used it has enough abrasive quality in it to remove surface imperfections and thus is somewhat considered a cleaner. sort of.....kind of....A product that is considered a pure polish is just that, no other properties in it, no wax, no sealer just polish.

When you talk about a product that has no real abrasive quality and you use the word "pure" most of the time this is used to describe a glaze.....

I agree with Dan and Boss here on this one...

Take PB EX as an example. It is a sealer with carnuba in it...there is no need to top it, however if you top it with a carnuba LSP product it works just fine and it many cases, it can enhance the depth.

If you were to use PB EX-P, that is a 100% pure sealant...and it is perfectly fine to top that product with a carnuba LSP but not with another polish/wax combo but like EX, some people do not feel the need to top or stack. Its a personal preference.

As you can see, it is somewhat dependent on which line or combo of products you are working and the choices you have for the desired results.

I sure hope that came out right, i haven't had an adult beverage yet so my thinking could be a little out of line here.
Meguiar's though does not consider a "polish" to do any cleaning. That isn't how they describe their products. I agree with the glaze part (Show Car Glaze, New Car Glaze). But, GC is not a cleaner wax (it will not clean [remove defects]), it is a wax with "glaze"/oils in it. You can top NXT with GC and not have problems because GC won't remove/clean anything. I went 2 months with that combo, and it was still A-OK when I just decided to put some NXT 2.0 on just because.

Originally Posted by 03gtmustang
If it didnt have any Carnauba in it, then I would think it would be called a sealant, not a wax. Its my understanding that synthetic waxes have polymers/acrylics along with some Carnauba. http://www.audizine.com/forum/showpo...29&postcount=3

Im waiting for a reply from Meguairs.
Meguiar's M21 Synthetic Sealant is essentially the exact same, except that it can be applied with a rotary and available in larger quantities. My understanding, from being on MOL for years, is NXT is only a synthetic wax. Meguiar's also uses wax and sealant, for the most part, interchangeably.
 

Last edited by roushstage2; Apr 30, 2008 at 05:01 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 08:43 AM
  #21  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by abervintageman4
i did a small test area w/ just nxt and the water beads up pretty well
Water beading up isn't really a sign of protection or how well the wax is working.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 09:06 AM
  #22  
RollingRock's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,813
Likes: 0
From: Aurora Texas
Originally Posted by ThumperMX113
Water beading up isn't really a sign of protection or how well the wax is working.
does that mean you will stop posting this?



ZING........
 

Last edited by RollingRock; Apr 30, 2008 at 10:15 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 10:40 AM
  #23  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RollingRock
does that mean you will stop posting this?

Nope !! I love that picture, it's beautiful !!

Zing !!! Dontcha know you're not supposed to wear white after Labor Day !?
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 01:30 PM
  #24  
03gtmustang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by glc
To me, NXT 2.0 by itself, 2 coats, not topped with carnauba, looks great. It seems so far to be VERY durable, if you use UQD after washing it almost makes it look like you just waxed it and it boosts the polymers.

For non-OCD'ers, I can honestly say that going right from clay to NXT 2.0 will satisfy most people out there. My stepdaughter and I did her 01 Catera this weekend - I clayed it for her, then handed her the ScratchX and told her to hit wherever she saw scratches while I took a nice break. When she was done I used NXT 2.0 while she did a complete interior detailing. She is **** about appearance but not quite OCD, and she was very impressed.
Pretty sure the second layer would just be removing the first layer.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 01:35 PM
  #25  
Gipraw's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
From: Cypress, TX
Originally Posted by 03gtmustang
Pretty sure the second layer would just be removing the first layer.
Two coats to ensure proper and complete coverage..

ever mindful of the law of diminishing returns.

 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 04:03 PM
  #26  
diggman08's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 344
Likes: 1
From: Mississippi, Gulf Coast
ok just to be on the same page.. before applying the second Coat of NXt, you buff of the first right...
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #27  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Yes and wait for the first layer to cure before applying the second coat. 12 hours is usually long enough.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 05:05 PM
  #28  
03gtmustang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Gipraw
Two coats to ensure proper and complete coverage..

ever mindful of the law of diminishing returns.

Overrated. Pay attention to how you're applying it and you wont be missing spots.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 05:13 PM
  #29  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 03gtmustang
Overrated. Pay attention to how you're applying it and you wont be missing spots.
There's more than one way to skin a cat. It doesn't mean one way is wrong. Different strokes for different folks.
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 06:52 PM
  #30  
03gtmustang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Just sharing my feelings...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 AM.