2014 Tremor - Looks fun!
#121
I know I know, were not talking about a supra, but this thing sounds badass!!
the argument of a v6 not sounding like a v8 is valid, but a v6 can sound awesome. I put in air conditioners for people, high efficiency, top off the line stuff in some cases, and theyre always worried about seeing it. I tell them to be proud of efficiency.
the argument of a v6 not sounding like a v8 is valid, but a v6 can sound awesome. I put in air conditioners for people, high efficiency, top off the line stuff in some cases, and theyre always worried about seeing it. I tell them to be proud of efficiency.
#122
I know I know, were not talking about a supra, but this thing sounds badass!!
Toyota Supra Twin Turbo Exhaust Sound - YouTube
the argument of a v6 not sounding like a v8 is valid, but a v6 can sound awesome. I put in air conditioners for people, high efficiency, top off the line stuff in some cases, and theyre always worried about seeing it. I tell them to be proud of efficiency.
Toyota Supra Twin Turbo Exhaust Sound - YouTube
the argument of a v6 not sounding like a v8 is valid, but a v6 can sound awesome. I put in air conditioners for people, high efficiency, top off the line stuff in some cases, and theyre always worried about seeing it. I tell them to be proud of efficiency.
FI straight six power.
#123
The Roush Phase 2 kit costs $6650 and adds 210Hp and 150 ft-lb to a 5.0. What Roush doesn't say is if these numbers were taken with their $650 exhaust system in place. I suspect they had done some exhaust work to the truck but didn't include it into the price. The real cost for the complete Roush package is more like $7300.
Full Race added a tune ($370) exhaust ($699) and new intercooler ($1100) and added 175Hp and 300Ft-Lb.
So for $4500-$5200 less the EB with on bolt ons makes 200Ft-Lb more torque and only 30 less Hp as the 5.0. I would put my money on the lighter truck with 200 more Ft-Lb in a race. How's that more potential working out?
Last edited by Wookie; 07-04-2013 at 11:35 AM.
#124
#126
Who buys a v6 mustang to dump money in it and street/drag race.... Most just buy it bc it's a mustang (cheaper than a gt) but yea it does get up and go. The 4.6 2v was a boat anchor in stock form (had one) minus the 4v 4.6. By the way I had a 4.0 v6 ranger that I beat and that truck is still running with the orginal motor has over 200 thousand miles now (know the current owner) so if it's built like those motors were I would drive it but rather have a v8. this thread has went off topic lol they all have blue ovals in the grille is all I care about each to their own.
#128
#129
I think the funniest thing is that you test drove the 5.0 and the Eco and didn't notice any difference, if I remember correctly. You might've even wanted a 5.0, but the Eco ended up being optioned and price where you wanted to be at the time, so you came home with it!
#130
Glc, the 3.7's are still slower than 4.6's and the 4.6's have a lot more torque, which is more overall power because it makes up for the 5 less horsepower.
Wookie, I still wouldn't trust a race tuned EcoBoost. They just aren't stable/reliable from what I've heard and seen. Full blown race tunes on anything with forced injection is asking for trouble (ie. all turbo diesels). Do you think a 75% increase in torque is safe when all you've done is a tune? I doubt it. A fully done supercharger system is relatively reliable. Also, don't forget the $1500 premium for the Eco. So that comes out to a $3,000 ish difference (because Roush cat back exhausts don't do crap for performance) and one is more stable than the other.
Larger displacement ALWAYS equals more potential to some extent. Take a full on race built 2.0L 4 cylinder motor with a huge turbo and it produces 500 hp. Then take a full on race built 4.6/5.0/5.4/5.8L V8 and it'll produce 1000 hp. Or, for less money than the completely built 4 banger, you could take the V8, do some things to it, and still end up with 500 hp. All while having lower maintenance and higher reliability.
I don't know what tone it sounds like I'm using, but this is purely conversational! I'm just replying. I don't want anything to sound confrontational
Wookie, I still wouldn't trust a race tuned EcoBoost. They just aren't stable/reliable from what I've heard and seen. Full blown race tunes on anything with forced injection is asking for trouble (ie. all turbo diesels). Do you think a 75% increase in torque is safe when all you've done is a tune? I doubt it. A fully done supercharger system is relatively reliable. Also, don't forget the $1500 premium for the Eco. So that comes out to a $3,000 ish difference (because Roush cat back exhausts don't do crap for performance) and one is more stable than the other.
Larger displacement ALWAYS equals more potential to some extent. Take a full on race built 2.0L 4 cylinder motor with a huge turbo and it produces 500 hp. Then take a full on race built 4.6/5.0/5.4/5.8L V8 and it'll produce 1000 hp. Or, for less money than the completely built 4 banger, you could take the V8, do some things to it, and still end up with 500 hp. All while having lower maintenance and higher reliability.
I don't know what tone it sounds like I'm using, but this is purely conversational! I'm just replying. I don't want anything to sound confrontational
Last edited by KMAC0694; 07-05-2013 at 09:58 PM.
#131
It may be where i live but i have not yet seen where they actually charge the extra 1500... Meaning when i was looking all of the texas towns for a new truck the Ecoboost's where exactly the same price if not cheaper... Thats how i got my truck, drove a 5.0 xlt with the chrome package but it didnt have the locking diff and a few other small options.. Then right next to it was my Truck that had more options and with the ecoboost for 1200 dollars cheaper.. Now i do like my ecobeast BUT i wouldnt pay an extra 1500 for it, if that was the case id be in a 5.0
#132
Not sure about the not noticing any difference between the two, The main difference i noticed between the two is the take off torque, i hit half throttle from the stop sign and the 5.0 moved nicely up to the speed limit, but when i did the eco the same way it took off alot quicker (of course after it hit boost) Theres nothing wrong with the 5.0 and like you said i was ready to sign the paperwork but got a better deal on the eco with more options. I sure like the sounds of them turbos!
#133
Wookie, I still wouldn't trust a race tuned EcoBoost. They just aren't stable/reliable from what I've heard and seen. Full blown race tunes on anything with forced injection is asking for trouble (ie. all turbo diesels). Do you think a 75% increase in torque is safe when all you've done is a tune? I doubt it. A fully done supercharger system is relatively reliable. Also, don't forget the $1500 premium for the Eco. So that comes out to a $3,000 ish difference (because Roush cat back exhausts don't do crap for performance) and one is more stable than the other.
Larger displacement ALWAYS equals more potential to some extent. Take a full on race built 2.0L 4 cylinder motor with a huge turbo and it produces 500 hp. Then take a full on race built 4.6/5.0/5.4/5.8L V8 and it'll produce 1000 hp. Or, for less money than the completely built 4 banger, you could take the V8, do some things to it, and still end up with 500 hp. All while having lower maintenance and higher reliability.
You can make just about anything fast if you throw enough money at it. In this case the EB can be made faster for a lot less money.
#135
The thing that gets me is I keep seeing 600+ who mustang 5.0s in signatures on mustang forums with blowers. I'm looking at them so doing more research... Motor can handle some power.
I'm not getting into it with anyone but wookie does have a point on the CR... FRPP sells a low cr 5.0 for boost.
I'm not getting into it with anyone but wookie does have a point on the CR... FRPP sells a low cr 5.0 for boost.