2009 - 2014 F-150

2011 5.0 f-150

Old Dec 2, 2010 | 09:06 AM
  #31  
_Flea_'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Nice lookin' truck!

Engine looks BETTER with no cover on it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 09:09 AM
  #32  
1depd's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 1
From: Gulf Coast
I think it looks "unfinished" because it doesn't have the carburetor an air cleaner on top. I still prefer the open engine to the plastic. I didn't really like the big clunky air cleaner on top anyway.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 09:25 AM
  #33  
°°Pat°°'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: Outaouais, Quebec, Canada
Originally Posted by Dunesgirl
Nice pics. I'm not a big fan of twenty inch wheels, but those look great! I like the color/finish, just needs a bit more rubber around them. And yeah, the 5.0 does look a bit "unfinished" without any covers or anything, but nonetheless, very cool!
That engine bay is asking for a supercharger
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 09:42 AM
  #34  
Vigs07R's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: MI
The engine looks cooler in person. I couldn't really get a good shot of it. I'd rather see it uncovered...plus it is easier access.

and yes there is PLENTY of room for a supercharger...I'm really wondering if Roush won't bring back the F-150. They wouldn't have to do much work and they have made big numbers with the 5XR Stang
 

Last edited by Vigs07R; Dec 2, 2010 at 09:48 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 09:52 AM
  #35  
TruckGuy24's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,731
Likes: 47
From: Concord, NC
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 10:24 AM
  #36  
mozy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
I don't know the differences compared to the Mustang 5.0, but if they put down similar numbers S/C there will be some competition for the Lightning.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 10:40 AM
  #37  
matthew87's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: NJ
post a black one when one comes.

truck looks good
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 10:56 AM
  #38  
fx4 for life 79's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 1
From: Katy, Tx
i wish my dad's truck would hurry up and come in, he ordered a '11 5.0 fx4 in flame blue
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 11:04 AM
  #39  
5point4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by fx4 for life 79
i wish my dad's truck would hurry up and come in, he ordered a '11 5.0 fx4 in flame blue
Know what ya mean. Waiting on my white fx2. White with the black heads and tails and 20s...mmm
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 11:46 AM
  #40  
Greg Matty's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by fx4 for life 79
i wish my dad's truck would hurry up and come in, he ordered a '11 5.0 fx4 in flame blue
That is what I would buy if I go with a 2011 F-150.

How long ago did he order? Do you have a build date?

Greg
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 12:37 PM
  #41  
fx4 for life 79's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 1
From: Katy, Tx
he orderd like nov. 15th not sure on build date, but they said it would be here 8-10 weeks
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 12:57 PM
  #42  
Vigs07R's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: MI
Originally Posted by mozy
I don't know the differences compared to the Mustang 5.0, but if they put down similar numbers S/C there will be some competition for the Lightning.
The only difference is the heads. These are cast, the mustang is aluminum. The tops of both appear to be the same so I am thinking the intake ports are the same....I could be wrong though!

Originally Posted by matthew87
post a black one when one comes.

truck looks good
Will do!

Originally Posted by fx4 for life 79
he orderd like nov. 15th not sure on build date, but they said it would be here 8-10 weeks
I believe the started shipping them on Monday of this week. So it should arrive this week or next.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 01:20 PM
  #43  
5point4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
The only difference is the heads. These are cast, the mustang is aluminum. The tops of both appear to be the same so I am thinking the intake ports are the same....I could be wrong though!
nope aluminum heads too
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 01:33 PM
  #44  
TX Chris's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 582
Likes: 0
From: Rowlett, TX
Originally Posted by Vigs07R
The only difference is the heads. These are cast, the mustang is aluminum. The tops of both appear to be the same so I am thinking the intake ports are the same....I could be wrong though!
Originally Posted by 5point4
nope aluminum heads too
The 5.0 in the truck IS NOT the exact same engine as the 5.0 in the Mustang. Very similar, but it has it's differences.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 01:38 PM
  #45  
5point4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by TX Chris
The 5.0 in the truck IS NOT the exact same engine as the 5.0 in the Mustang. Very similar, but it has it's differences.
i believe the main difference is the cams (and of course tuning), which i believe is how they lowered compression ratio as well (keeping valves closed longer on intake stroke?) the different cams allow for more low end torque as well for truck applications
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 PM.