2009 - 2014 F-150

5.4 #s are out w/proof

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2008 | 12:25 PM
  #31  
Tbird69's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Originally Posted by GerRod
Well said. Ford has never led in power. I think most people buy trucks for towing and hauling rather than racing. It's evident by the F150 being the least powerful and the best seller.

As one member alluded to, the 6 speed tranny will make a world of difference vs the current F150.
Until everyone else starts putting 6 speeds behind their almost 400 HP engines.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 01:54 PM
  #32  
fordmantpw's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 3
From: Linn, MO
Originally Posted by Tbird69
Until everyone else starts putting 6 speeds behind their almost 400 HP engines.
No, actually, it doesn't matter what everyone else does. What GerRod said is true: "the 6 speed tranny will make a world of difference vs the current F150."

IMO, the 4 speed tranny is the one weak link with the current F150. It is a strong tranny, just that a new 6 speed will make it much more drivable and the shifts much better. If I could change one thing about my truck, it would be to swap in a new 6-speed inplace of the old 4 speed.
 

Last edited by fordmantpw; May 19, 2008 at 01:58 PM.
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 02:48 PM
  #33  
XLT-FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern MA
Well, unless the new six speed has significantly steeper first and second gears, I don't think the transmission itself will make much difference. Sure, while already at speed, having a couple of more gears to use will make better use of the engine's power for passing or hitting hills. But for the first several seconds from a stop with the foot mashed to the floor, pretty much 1st and 2nd gear are all we're going to be going through before we hit 60 or so mph. Part throttle acceleration will probably also be stronger.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 03:17 PM
  #34  
mr_andy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
....assuming the final drive ratio of both 4 and 6 speed tranny basically equivalent in their top gears, it's probably a safe assumption that first gear in the 6 speed is significantly lower than
1st in the 4 speed.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #35  
BlackDawg's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Jupiter, Florida
6 speed 1st = 4.17, 2nd = 2.34, 3rd = 1.52, 4th = 1.14, 5th = .87, 6th = .69
4 speed 1st = 2.84, 2nd = 1.55, 3rd = 1.00, 4th = .70
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 05:18 PM
  #36  
XLT-FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern MA
Originally Posted by BlackDawg
6 speed 1st = 4.17, 2nd = 2.34, 3rd = 1.52, 4th = 1.14, 5th = .87, 6th = .69
4 speed 1st = 2.84, 2nd = 1.55, 3rd = 1.00, 4th = .70
Then that definitely should help. Time will tell. A paramedic friend of mine has been driving Expeditions for years. They have a few newer ones with the 6-speed and he has said he feels no difference between them and the older 4-speeds.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 05:54 PM
  #37  
rk2girls's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Ummmm.....

PUTC had this updated regarding the new power numbers...

A source has come forward with additional details about power ratings for 5.4-L 3-valve V8 equipped 2009 Ford F-150s. The ratings vary, whether the truck is fueled with regular gasoline or E85 (85% ethanol / 15% gasoline).

- 320hp and 390 lb-ft (running on E85)
- 310hp and 365 lb-ft (running on gasoline)


Better on E-85?? Any of you more scientifically talented people have any easy explanation for this? Thanx!!
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #38  
mr_andy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Alberta
...my first hunch is they are flipped around in error. It would seem kind of odd to advertise higher power numbers for e85 given that the vast majority of f150 drivers will burn gas i'm guessing. I suppose it *is* possible...if the fuel rate is high enough you could produce more power...but then what's the point over gas?...oh right, it's a 'green' fuel.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #39  
Surfer's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Boca Raton, FL
Originally Posted by XLT-FX4
Then that definitely should help. Time will tell. A paramedic friend of mine has been driving Expeditions for years. They have a few newer ones with the 6-speed and he has said he feels no difference between them and the older 4-speeds.
Yeh our friend has a new Navigator with the 6 speed auto and it really doesn't feel any different then the Exped/Navi with the 4 speed auto before.

And I don't know if anyone else on here has driven one of the new 6 speed autos from Ford but they need more programming work or something, it always seems to not know what gear to choose or starts constantly shifting gears, plenty of owners have said that and magazine reviews have said it as well. I had a new V8 Mountaineer as a loaner from the dealer and wasn't that impressed which was the 6 speed as well. Definitely needs a tranny tune or something from SCT etc. GM's 6 speed is real good, it was perfect in the Denali I drove. Makes me wonder if these new trannies will be up to the towing ability of the trucks, as I even heard some of the GM guys blowing their new tranny when towing or hot rodding etc, I mean even the Vette guys reported the same thing and the trucks way a hell of a lot more.
 

Last edited by Surfer; May 19, 2008 at 06:52 PM.
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 09:17 PM
  #40  
Rambo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by FATHERFORD
So basicly we have a heavier truck...So it looks to me it will still be about the same truck..
No, it's lighter and different.
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 11:48 PM
  #41  
weazel's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,000
Likes: 0
we have a 6 speed expy... they do seem to have better take off then the 4 speed. It is much smoother and doesn't drag like the 4 speeds do... But as stated before, they do need some tuning. But like every one knows all fords are detuned and run SLOW.....
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 01:02 AM
  #42  
eric88gt's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Chisholm, MN
I would guess that the numbers are correct as far as the e85 is concerned. The octane rating of e85 is 105, so i would imagine they went with a far more aggressive tune when e85 is in the tank to take advantage of it. Too bad for those people who don't have access to it...
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 06:17 AM
  #43  
FATHERFORD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,102
Likes: 0
From: Waco/Houston
Originally Posted by Rambo
No, it's lighter and different.
All these new bells and whistles and it's lighter?

I hardly beleive that. Even if they have new "lighter materials"
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 01:52 PM
  #44  
Rambo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 0
From: USA
The engineers have said that it is the same or a bit lighter, which is significant because of all of the new features they added. The way they did this was through the use of high strength steel in the frame and ultra high strength hydroformed steel in the cab which is lighter but stronger.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2008 | 05:05 PM
  #45  
f150top's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Rambo
The engineers have said that it is the same or a bit lighter, which is significant because of all of the new features they added. The way they did this was through the use of high strength steel in the frame and ultra high strength hydroformed steel in the cab which is lighter but stronger.
no its not its heavier you idiot. my dad said the truck is longer and heavier
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 PM.