porting the manifold
porting the manifold
ok well ive been thinking and talking with weazel about this, it started by me wanting to bore out the main hole that the TB goes because i have a bbk tb and this would make it so the tb actuall makes a difference, then we talked about gasket matching the manifold, then all that led to removing the cmc plates, what do you guys think? possible? worth the work?
and obviously a new tune will be needed, and i plan to do this along with some pacesetter long tubes and single 3" straight pipe and with my jlt intake
discuss
and obviously a new tune will be needed, and i plan to do this along with some pacesetter long tubes and single 3" straight pipe and with my jlt intake
discuss
Originally Posted by azmidget91
ok well ive been thinking and talking with weazel about this, it started by me wanting to bore out the main hole that the TB goes because i have a bbk tb and this would make it so the tb actuall makes a difference, then we talked about gasket matching the manifold, then all that led to removing the cmc plates, what do you guys think? possible? worth the work?
and obviously a new tune will be needed, and i plan to do this along with some pacesetter long tubes and single 3" straight pipe and with my jlt intake
discuss
and obviously a new tune will be needed, and i plan to do this along with some pacesetter long tubes and single 3" straight pipe and with my jlt intake
discuss
Look at it this way. You might pick up enough flow from port matching the throttle body on a N/A engine to pick up *MAYBE* 1 Hp at 5500 RPM. That's not worth it.
The CMC plates... Don't know if that's even possible. I dont remember what the intake manifold looks like.. but it seems like the "butterflies" were built into the manifold.. You could have to cut them off if thats the case.
If you got the spare time and spare dyno money.. go for it. But don't expect much. Tell us mall about it if you do it.
The CMC plates... Don't know if that's even possible. I dont remember what the intake manifold looks like.. but it seems like the "butterflies" were built into the manifold.. You could have to cut them off if thats the case.
If you got the spare time and spare dyno money.. go for it. But don't expect much. Tell us mall about it if you do it.
So why did you buy a new TB if the stock one already could out flow the engine?
IMRCs are a very good thing for low end TQ at low TP pos.
The throttle body blade only is at 82* at 100% TP. (NOT FULL OPEN, 90*) FYI
IMRCs are a very good thing for low end TQ at low TP pos.
The throttle body blade only is at 82* at 100% TP. (NOT FULL OPEN, 90*) FYI
Last edited by i.ride.suzuki; Dec 2, 2007 at 05:00 AM.
Originally Posted by i.ride.suzuki
So why did you buy a new TB if the stock one already could out flow the engine?
IMRCs are a very good thing for low end TQ at low TP pos.
The throttle body blade only is at 82* at 100% TP. (NOT FULL OPEN, 90*) FYI
IMRCs are a very good thing for low end TQ at low TP pos.
The throttle body blade only is at 82* at 100% TP. (NOT FULL OPEN, 90*) FYI
Trending Topics
OK...
This is for the 5.4l 3v, if anyone wants calcs on the 4.6 just let me know.
The engine will consume 525.4877553CFM at 5500RPM. But we still need to make room for some fuel. A 12.6:1 AFR will reduce the ammount of air at that RPM by 41.7053774CFM. So we come out with 483.7823779CFM that actually flows into the TB. The stock TB is good for ~800CFM. The intake valves can out flow the engine at low lift, low lift on the exhaust side @ .100 is the only area that the heads don't outflow the engine. A lot of engineering went into the intake manifold. The only changes i would make is add another 2" for more low end TQ. And modify and open the IMRC butterflies slightly larger. The IMRC work awesome when they are closed. You can call it pulse tuning. When they are closed the intake valves open, then close causing 0 flow. The pressure bounces off the IMRC plates and charges the air back past the valve.
This is for the 5.4l 3v, if anyone wants calcs on the 4.6 just let me know.
The engine will consume 525.4877553CFM at 5500RPM. But we still need to make room for some fuel. A 12.6:1 AFR will reduce the ammount of air at that RPM by 41.7053774CFM. So we come out with 483.7823779CFM that actually flows into the TB. The stock TB is good for ~800CFM. The intake valves can out flow the engine at low lift, low lift on the exhaust side @ .100 is the only area that the heads don't outflow the engine. A lot of engineering went into the intake manifold. The only changes i would make is add another 2" for more low end TQ. And modify and open the IMRC butterflies slightly larger. The IMRC work awesome when they are closed. You can call it pulse tuning. When they are closed the intake valves open, then close causing 0 flow. The pressure bounces off the IMRC plates and charges the air back past the valve.
Originally Posted by Dribone
is it similar to what i did on mine? i didn't take a lot of material out though.



