A good sparkplug story
Man, I used to use Shell and BP only but now my company gave me a company gas card that uses Chevron.
Is Chevron worth a crap? I figured it's better than the no names but I don't think it's as good as Shell or BP.
Is Chevron worth a crap? I figured it's better than the no names but I don't think it's as good as Shell or BP.
Originally Posted by azmidget91
im at 76k with the stockers.....i have used 100% shell reg for the first year and premium the second year(cuz of the xcal2) regular oil changes every 3-5k miles and i live in the booneys so all my trips are long, only down side is i drive like a pissed off teenager, im pleanty capable of puling plugs just kinda scared of breaking one with my high miles
Last edited by mitch150; Oct 5, 2007 at 06:35 AM.
Originally Posted by Tylus
unless your truck is experiencing problems, why change the plugs? These things are good for 100K supposedly.
glad y'all had no problems changing 'em
glad y'all had no problems changing 'em
) when it comes time to change them! Not to mention the wear on the plugs. The gap on the plugs I took out had grown quite a bit. 100,000 miles my ars!
Well after a few days of driving with the new plugs it was well worth the money. The truck idles much smoother now even at the ridiculous 525-550 idle speed they have. The throttle response is much better also. I think they run better on the colder plug.
Originally Posted by mitch150
As I stated before, carbon build up over 100,000 miles will make the plugs stick and there will be hell to pay (and lots of money
) when it comes time to change them!
) when it comes time to change them!I'm not trying to slam you, but it's become a pet peeve of mine when people make definitive statements based on insufficient data. It will generally mislead the folks on here that are not mechanically inclined, and may cause them to "fix" something that isn't broken.
Originally Posted by Lee F.
And this statement is based on what data? Unless you've pulled plugs on at least a dozen different trucks at each of 20K, 25K, 30K, 35K, 40K . . . . up to 100K miles (204 different trucks if I did the math right) then your statement is probably based on one truck that you have no idea when and if they carbon up. All you would know is if you had a problem or not, at your mileage, with your driving conditions, fuel choice, driving habits, etc. Even if you are a Ford mechanic you probably haven't pulled enough plugs to make a blanket statement like that.
I'm not trying to slam you, but it's become a pet peeve of mine when people make definitive statements based on insufficient data. It will generally mislead the folks on here that are not mechanically inclined, and may cause them to "fix" something that isn't broken.
I'm not trying to slam you, but it's become a pet peeve of mine when people make definitive statements based on insufficient data. It will generally mislead the folks on here that are not mechanically inclined, and may cause them to "fix" something that isn't broken.
Originally Posted by Lee F.
And this statement is based on what data? Unless you've pulled plugs on at least a dozen different trucks at each of 20K, 25K, 30K, 35K, 40K . . . . up to 100K miles (204 different trucks if I did the math right) then your statement is probably based on one truck that you have no idea when and if they carbon up. All you would know is if you had a problem or not, at your mileage, with your driving conditions, fuel choice, driving habits, etc. Even if you are a Ford mechanic you probably haven't pulled enough plugs to make a blanket statement like that.
I'm not trying to slam you, but it's become a pet peeve of mine when people make definitive statements based on insufficient data. It will generally mislead the folks on here that are not mechanically inclined, and may cause them to "fix" something that isn't broken.
I'm not trying to slam you, but it's become a pet peeve of mine when people make definitive statements based on insufficient data. It will generally mislead the folks on here that are not mechanically inclined, and may cause them to "fix" something that isn't broken.
But if they pulled the plugs at 100K+
If they pulled the plugs at 100K+, then those Ford mechanics don't know when they were carboned up. Those trucks could have had the problem since 10K miles, or since 50K miles, and the mechanic has no clue when they got bad enough to be a problem. It could be that once that crevice fills up it is permanent, which could happen in 10K miles. It could be that it builds up when the engine is cold and burns away after a prolonged hard run. So it could be that the plugs were fine at 95K and carboned up in the last 5K because it was winter, and they started the truck and drove straight to the dealer for a service. No one knows how those trucks were driven every day before work started, or what fuel was used. It sounds like your plugs were almost a problem at 70K miles, and I'd suspect that as someone that knows about the plug breakage, you were super-careful to make sure you took it slow, used plenty of penetrant, gave it plenty of soak time, etc. Dealers are sitting there with a truck taking up a service bay, and an owner wanting his truck back, and they don't have the luxury of waiting.
Like I said, there is nowhere near enough data to support your statement.
For the record, I wasn't taking issue with whether there was wear on the electrode, although as long as the coil pack has enough energy to fire across the gap, the wear doesn't really matter. It is not like a worn bearing - it is an electrical gap. A smaller gap isn't necessarily better. A larger gap actually fires through more air/fuel mix with a higher energy, so it may be better, as long as the gap isn't too big to fire across. I'm pretty sure Ford tested at least a couple of engines before they delivered the trucks, and they determined that the gap growth was not detrimental to engine performance.
If there is no engine miss and no performance issue, you wasted your money and took a risk of breakage changing plugs at 70K. Glad it worked out for you -
- The Bonehead
Like I said, there is nowhere near enough data to support your statement.
For the record, I wasn't taking issue with whether there was wear on the electrode, although as long as the coil pack has enough energy to fire across the gap, the wear doesn't really matter. It is not like a worn bearing - it is an electrical gap. A smaller gap isn't necessarily better. A larger gap actually fires through more air/fuel mix with a higher energy, so it may be better, as long as the gap isn't too big to fire across. I'm pretty sure Ford tested at least a couple of engines before they delivered the trucks, and they determined that the gap growth was not detrimental to engine performance.
If there is no engine miss and no performance issue, you wasted your money and took a risk of breakage changing plugs at 70K. Glad it worked out for you -
- The Bonehead
Just passing along some info is all
Not sure what your whole point is? I was simply passing along some info given to me by a ford certified mech. This thread is about spark plug breakage. Ok, if it's not a carbon thing, then my appoligies to you. I was just stating what I was told and not as fact. FACT IS PLUGS ARE BREAKING IN THESE TRUCKS for whatever the reason may be. Carbon build up could be one of the reasons. As far as the rest of your post goes, truck WAS running a little rough. Worn plugs do contribute to that. Since having changed my plugs, the truck is running smoother and better so no it was not a waste of my money or my time for that matter. And no, I did not use any penatrating spray or let the plugs soak. I just took my time. So what are you going to do as far as risking breakage, never change your plugs?
Sorry this got off topic - I'm done after this
Remember, this was a good sparkplug story.
Mitch150:
1 - Like I said, I'm glad your sparkplug change worked out for you. If it cured a roughness, which I don't recall you mentioning before, then it must have done some good. That does not mean the average person needs to change their plugs at 70K, though. That just means you needed to, with your truck, under your driving conditions, with your fuel history.
2 - From your post #35 in this thread: "As I stated before, carbon build up over 100,000 miles will make the plugs stick and there will be hell to pay (and lots of money) when it comes time to change them!"
That certainly comes across to me as if you were presenting a fact, not an opinion. And what you stated was purely opinion.
The whole point I was trying to make was very simple, and I thought obvious: The only thing that is really known on the plug issue is that sometimes they break, and they break less when you follow the Ford removal instructions. Other than that, no one really knows if it's better to do it sooner or later, or what makes the condition worse or better beforehand. To claim a magical mileage that will work or to claim that the factory recommended mileage will mislead folks that don't know any better.
Mitch150:
1 - Like I said, I'm glad your sparkplug change worked out for you. If it cured a roughness, which I don't recall you mentioning before, then it must have done some good. That does not mean the average person needs to change their plugs at 70K, though. That just means you needed to, with your truck, under your driving conditions, with your fuel history.
2 - From your post #35 in this thread: "As I stated before, carbon build up over 100,000 miles will make the plugs stick and there will be hell to pay (and lots of money) when it comes time to change them!"
That certainly comes across to me as if you were presenting a fact, not an opinion. And what you stated was purely opinion.
The whole point I was trying to make was very simple, and I thought obvious: The only thing that is really known on the plug issue is that sometimes they break, and they break less when you follow the Ford removal instructions. Other than that, no one really knows if it's better to do it sooner or later, or what makes the condition worse or better beforehand. To claim a magical mileage that will work or to claim that the factory recommended mileage will mislead folks that don't know any better.
Originally Posted by SAJEFFC
Well I must say I am very relieved. Had my 30k service done today and went ahead and had the plugs changed as well. My truck has 29300 miles and really only sees highway driving. I use only Shell gasoline in it and put in a can of BG 44K about every 6k miles. Long story short, the plugs came out as easy as can be!
My tech buddy followed the TSB with the penetrating oil and all but probably didn't need to. The plugs spun out just like the old days and had NO rust on them at all. I will post pics of them later tonight when I get home. Guess good maintenance and some highway driving really does pay off. 
My tech buddy followed the TSB with the penetrating oil and all but probably didn't need to. The plugs spun out just like the old days and had NO rust on them at all. I will post pics of them later tonight when I get home. Guess good maintenance and some highway driving really does pay off. 
Lariatf150 yes I wash my engine all the time. Usually do it last after washing the truck and just soap it down and rinse with the hose on low. I then take my air compressor and blow off the water around the plugs and the top of the engine. Remember, the part of the plug that is rusting is inside the head and sealed from any outside moisture so washing the engine does not affect them.



