2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

JLT Dyno Numbers

Old Sep 7, 2006 | 10:02 AM
  #31  
NCSU_05_FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 4
From: Lexington, KY
Hey Jay, no harm no foul.

I do have the XCal2 but I'm not going to mess with anything as I don't feel I am qualified to do so. I have confidence in my tuner to get everything to where it should be. I'll keep anyone who's interested updated as I go along with this.

One note about the AF1 I installed... Its the 3.25" intake which requires a custom tune due to the even greater increased intake capacity. This may have something to do with the "plug and play" you mentioned...
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2006 | 06:28 PM
  #32  
mwheue's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Everett, Wash
The JLT intake and AF1 3.25" intake require a certain tune to perform well. As it was put to me earlier if you are not using there (JLT)intake and there SCT/JLT tune together then all is not necessarily well and good. Same holds true for the Af1 and Troyer SCT tune. It is good info to know and I for one would like to see the results from both of the above members after the a/f ratio's are ironed out. Not as a competition but as a FYI thread..... Good info and thanks to both of you for sharing !
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #33  
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
I am very curious, and very interested in results. I have to discount your credibility if you believe you're close to 270...nevermind I read it wrong. Closer is the keyword. Good luck with your dyno numbers guys, let me know the results of your dyno here in this thread..

Originally Posted by badcobra
Our combos are pretty similar. I have the JLT intake, custom JLT SCT tune, and Flowmaster SIDO muffler. The numbers should be fairly close. I think with the added timing and A/F closer to 13.0, my HP# would be closer to 270. We'll see when I get it back there....
 
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 07:07 AM
  #34  
Tucker1154's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake VA
Originally Posted by Josiah
I am very curious, and very interested in results. I have to discount your credibility if you believe you're close to 270...nevermind I read it wrong. Closer is the keyword. Good luck with your dyno numbers guys, let me know the results of your dyno here in this thread..
Josiah, we have seen 260-270 with near perfect A/F in all our testing and customer feedbacks.
Plug and play, no more back and forth to the dyno and tuner. Who ever tuned the truck above I would guess has tuned 100's of AF1's. No A/F should be that rich, not even with a emailed tune. Just my opinion.

What worries me is the 98% of us truck owners who take confidance in there tuner and never have there A/F checked. Many could be running around wat too rich or dangerously lean and not know it.
If NCSU didn't check his he would be getting horriable gas milage and run the danger of washing down his cylinder walls with that much fuel.

Thanks
Jay
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 07:43 PM
  #35  
F150 Duke's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 0
From: In a van down by the river
Originally Posted by Tucker1154
Josiah, we have seen 260-270 with near perfect A/F in all our testing and customer feedbacks.
Plug and play, no more back and forth to the dyno and tuner. Who ever tuned the truck above I would guess has tuned 100's of AF1's. No A/F should be that rich, not even with a emailed tune. Just my opinion.

What worries me is the 98% of us truck owners who take confidance in there tuner and never have there A/F checked. Many could be running around wat too rich or dangerously lean and not know it.
If NCSU didn't check his he would be getting horriable gas milage and run the danger of washing down his cylinder walls with that much fuel.

Thanks
Jay
I'm running that rich too and was told it isn't an issue for the short term while my tunes are fixed over the next two weeks. Is this not true?

Duke
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 07:59 PM
  #36  
Tucker1154's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake VA
Originally Posted by F150 Duke
I'm running that rich too and was told it isn't an issue for the short term while my tunes are fixed over the next two weeks. Is this not true?

Duke
What are your A/F's?

Jay
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 08:16 PM
  #37  
anaheim_drew's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim, Ca.
Originally Posted by Tucker1154
What are your A/F's? Jay
Hey Jay How is the Magnacharger?
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 08:30 PM
  #38  
Tucker1154's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake VA
Originally Posted by anaheim_drew
Hey Jay How is the Magnacharger?
I LOVE this truck now. We did a new SCT tune and a custom JLT intake and were at 386 RWHP and 413 RWTQ!
Dead stop mash results in 20-30' or rubber from 33" nittos. Man I love this truck... Did I say that all ready??
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 08:56 PM
  #39  
anaheim_drew's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim, Ca.
Originally Posted by Tucker1154
I LOVE this truck now. We did a new SCT tune and a custom JLT intake and were at 386 RWHP and 413 RWTQ!
Dead stop mash results in 20-30' or rubber from 33" nittos. Man I love this truck... Did I say that all ready??
From 345 RWHP/365 RWTQ to 386 RWHP/413 RWTQ with your new tune and intake Thats a 41 rwhp/48 rwtq gain I'll take an intake if it is chrome or polished... lets talk in the supercharger forum

Sorry to highjack
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 09:08 PM
  #40  
Tucker1154's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake VA
Originally Posted by anaheim_drew
From 345 RWHP/365 RWTQ to 386 RWHP/413 RWTQ with your new tune and intake Thats a 41 rwhp/48 rwtq gain I'll take an intake if it is chrome or polished... lets talk in the supercharger forum

Sorry to highjack
We picked up 20+ from just allowing the shift points to go to 6000, then another 20 or so from the JLT.
Love it.
I'll look for your thread.

Jay
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 09:45 PM
  #41  
anaheim_drew's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim, Ca.
Originally Posted by Tucker1154
We picked up 20+ from just allowing the shift points to go to 6000, then another 20 or so from the JLT.
Love it.
I'll look for your thread. Jay
I still want a chrome or polished intake
 

Last edited by anaheim_drew; Nov 23, 2006 at 07:51 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 12:04 AM
  #42  
F150 Duke's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,009
Likes: 0
From: In a van down by the river
Originally Posted by Tucker1154
What are your A/F's?

Jay
This was a 3rd gear pull.

A/F:
 
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2006 | 12:40 AM
  #43  
styxnpicks's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,700
Likes: 0
From: my apartment
jesus, I'm no rocket scientist but that A/F ratio is off the charts
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #44  
NCSU_05_FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,120
Likes: 4
From: Lexington, KY
I got my new tune tested, and the A/Fs are much closer to what they should be now. Best run was 255/320.

This is the last run of the day, 3rd gear pull.



- NCSU
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2007 | 05:30 PM
  #45  
Rockpick's Avatar
Moderator &
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 31,440
Likes: 4
From: The Bluegrass State
259/326
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 PM.