2004 - 2008 F-150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Real Truck

Got owned!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 01:42 AM
  #16  
04procompLARIAT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
No, I know he knew. He was reving like a **** at the light... He knew trust me, my truck is just a monster.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 01:52 AM
  #17  
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
You're going to get smack from a many of people, I supposedly could not beat a near stock titan to many folks. And that was when I was on my stockers.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 02:10 AM
  #18  
anaheim_drew's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim, Ca.
Talking

Originally Posted by rocky85
I think with some of these stories, the other party wasn't even trying to race. They're just driving normal or twidling their thumbs at the light, and somehow they mistake that the other party wants to race.
I agree... But, if after exchanging "that look" he revs on you and has a buddy riding shotgun......... that should leave no doubt in your mind
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 05:07 AM
  #19  
RED WING NUT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: Detroit Rock City
What's not to believe? A 5500 lb. 300 hp truck with over sized tires beating a 3500 lb. 300 hp car....


Suuuure!



Not in this lifetime.


 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 06:00 AM
  #20  
charlie101's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by Josiah
On that note, I hate when people eye**** me because 90% of the time they turn to their friend and try to convince them of how mommy paid for it or daddy lifted it...****.
Because almost 90% of the time they're right.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 05:12 PM
  #21  
04 RED LARIAT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,138
Likes: 1
From: Ky/Va Mountains
Originally Posted by RED WING NUT
What's not to believe? A 5500 lb. 300 hp truck with over sized tires beating a 3500 lb. 300 hp car....


Suuuure!



Not in this lifetime.


Funny how that works huh.
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 05:53 PM
  #22  
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 1
From: Northern CA
Originally Posted by RedWingNut
What's not to believe? A 5500 lb. 300 hp truck with over sized tires beating a 3500 lb. 300 hp car....


Suuuure!



Not in this lifetime.
He's geared as well, among other mods. So at the flywheel he's over 300, but probably not more than 315fwhp. It also matters where they are seeing those 300 pony's, but the stick GT I drove had monster low end. Who knows, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

Originally Posted by charlie101
Because almost 90% of the time they're right.
go Charlie!
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 07:07 PM
  #23  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 158
From: DFW
Originally Posted by RED WING NUT
What's not to believe? A 5500 lb. 300 hp truck with over sized tires beating a 3500 lb. 300 hp car....

Not in this lifetime.
The new mustangs are No where near 3500 pounds. I think they are like 4100-4200 And i believe they are around 300hp like you said, but thats at the crank, so he at best is puttin down 280. And if he regeared its completely possible.

I hung with my friends SS camaro out of a light, he dynoed at 370 before he did his big cam, and put down 405. We raced out of a light, i actually pulled slightly ahead of him, b.c his car was just spinning the whole time. It was an A4 car at the time, it shifted to second, stopped spinning, shifted back to first and was gone!

I really do believe this guys story, its completely possible, especially if the GT was an Auto. I used to race my friends 02? GT stang and i could hang until about 80- and he was an automatic also....
-Patrick
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 07:21 PM
  #24  
RED WING NUT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: Detroit Rock City
Originally Posted by Patman03SprCrw
The new mustangs are No where near 3500 pounds. I think they are like 4100-4200...
3483 lbs. to be exact. Don't believe me? Look here http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2...22/138160.html

The V6 is 200 lbs. lighter at 3300 lbs.

11.6 lbs. per horsepower for the mustang versus 18.3 lbs. per horsepower for the F150.
This isn't brain surgery, just physics.

A Mustang Gt can run mid 13 second 1/4 miles. Your truck is nowhere near that.
 

Last edited by RED WING NUT; Aug 24, 2006 at 07:36 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 07:23 PM
  #25  
GerRod's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,177
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Originally Posted by ThumperMX113
Sounds like he really couldn't drive. I raced a 05 F-150 in my girlfriends V6 Mustang 5 spd and it was over for the F-150. . :o

Exactly, I've seen a lot more lose to a lot less because the driver didn't know what he was doing...
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 08:29 PM
  #26  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 158
From: DFW
Originally Posted by RED WING NUT
3483 lbs. to be exact. Don't believe me? Look here http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2...22/138160.html

The V6 is 200 lbs. lighter at 3300 lbs.

11.6 lbs. per horsepower for the mustang versus 18.3 lbs. per horsepower for the F150.
This isn't brain surgery, just physics.

A Mustang Gt can run mid 13 second 1/4 miles. Your truck is nowhere near that.
Looked at your site quoted, and i call BS. It isnt a credible website.

I looked at RoadandTrack.com
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....&page_number=3
R&T suggests 3500lbs+

And CarandDriver.com
http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtest...-gt-page4.html
C&D says Curb weight: 3523 lb

I was thinkin of the new GT500 which has a curb weight of 4100lbs....

And as for our trucks not being able to run a mid 13 or w.e thats not the debat here, it is IF (and i do think so) he can hang with the Mustang GT up to around 50.
It would be more acurate to compare the 0-60 times of both vehicles.
-Patrick
 

Last edited by Patman; Aug 24, 2006 at 08:31 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 12:41 AM
  #27  
Aaron_j's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by Patman03SprCrw
Looked at your site quoted, and i call BS. It isnt a credible website.

I looked at RoadandTrack.com
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article....&page_number=3
R&T suggests 3500lbs+

And CarandDriver.com
http://www.caranddriver.com/roadtest...-gt-page4.html
C&D says Curb weight: 3523 lb

I was thinkin of the new GT500 which has a curb weight of 4100lbs....

And as for our trucks not being able to run a mid 13 or w.e thats not the debat here, it is IF (and i do think so) he can hang with the Mustang GT up to around 50.
It would be more acurate to compare the 0-60 times of both vehicles.
-Patrick
I have seen 0-60 times of ~5.2 for the Mustang. Stock.

My retuned 5.4L 2wd Scab is ~6.8

The guy in the Mustang either wasn't racing or he really screwed up. The F150 can not hang with a Mustang without a supercharger or nitrous. I don't give a damn what gears you stick in it. Period. End of subject.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 12:56 AM
  #28  
04procompLARIAT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Dang guys...I am not saying I beat him! This kid was like 20 years old and obviousely doesnt know how to drive a fast car. My ex girlfriend had an 05 GT stick and holy hell a@@ its a fast car if you can drive it right. My truck is pretty fast but no where near as fast as a stock GT.
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 01:01 AM
  #29  
Patman's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 21,337
Likes: 158
From: DFW
well a 5.2 time is done with near perfect conditions/ driver.

especially with a passenger in the mustang he was atleast 3650lbs. And as others suggested he may not have been that good of a driver, and with a regeared truck, automatic, that shifts perfectly at power band, it is still possible to hang with the stang up to 50. Now im not suggesting that he beat him as you said it is impossible to beat the stang.

I am suggesting tho that it is completely possible for him to hang up to 50.
Just admit that its possible, now im not saying on paper, with both drivers being the best. Just saying on the street with a young kid not knowning everything about how to drive his car. IT IS POSSIBLE!
-Patrick
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2006 | 01:07 AM
  #30  
04procompLARIAT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,720
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by Patman03SprCrw
well a 5.2 time is done with near perfect conditions/ driver.

especially with a passenger in the mustang he was atleast 3650lbs. And as others suggested he may not have been that good of a driver, and with a regeared truck, automatic, that shifts perfectly at power band, it is still possible to hang with the stang up to 50. Now im not suggesting that he beat him as you said it is impossible to beat the stang.

I am suggesting tho that it is completely possible for him to hang up to 50.
Just admit that its possible, now im not saying on paper, with both drivers being the best. Just saying on the street with a young kid not knowning everything about how to drive his car. IT IS POSSIBLE!
-Patrick
x2!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 PM.