New experience
Originally Posted by Justins FX4
so with enough mods i'd say its possible to beat one in 1/4 but its top end speed will kill the f150 in thelong run
Originally Posted by 300wby
My last roommate owned a is300 which i got to drive a handful of times. That car isnt anything to worry about, not very fast, not very quick. It's low end Lexus....believe me.
I have a friend with a white IS300 and it runs 12s!
Originally Posted by RamSS/T
I think that anyone that really thinks these trucks are fast has never actually owned anything FAST. A 16.5 sec quarter mile is NOT FAST. It may not be as slow as something else but its still far from FAST.
i was reading some car mag the other day and was looking at a 4 page list of all the specs of pretty much every new car there is. the fastest stock production car is a enzo that only runs high 12's i think. it was only stock car to break 13's. so these trucks aint fast but there not just slow. they do feel very slow tho
Originally Posted by Justins FX4
i was reading some car mag the other day and was looking at a 4 page list of all the specs of pretty much every new car there is. the fastest stock production car is a enzo that only runs high 12's i think. it was only stock car to break 13's. so these trucks aint fast but there not just slow. they do feel very slow tho 

2006 Z06 Vette - 11.3
2004 Viper - 11.77
2005 Ford GT - 11.78
and honorable mention to the 2004 Cobra -12.9 (thats enzo times in your book)
and BTW the Enzo runs 11.0s. Like I said you may want to re -read your magazine.
Originally Posted by RamSS/T
You may want to go back an RE-read that magazine. These are just a few factory American made cars UNDER 12 seconds:
2006 Z06 Vette - 11.3
2004 Viper - 11.77
2005 Ford GT - 11.78
and the 2004 Cobra -12.9
and BTW the Enzo runs 11.0s. Like I said you may want to re -read your magazine.
2006 Z06 Vette - 11.3
2004 Viper - 11.77
2005 Ford GT - 11.78
and the 2004 Cobra -12.9
and BTW the Enzo runs 11.0s. Like I said you may want to re -read your magazine.
Originally Posted by Mattieb87
well in a sence you both are right.....sometimes the car testers will test out the cars at higher altitudes.....ive seen different magazines give different results....and 9 times our ot 10 the magazine with the slower test results post that their test elevation was higher
Two tenths maybe....not two SECONDS. The difference between 13sec and 11sec is HUGE .
Originally Posted by bigyellowtruck1
Its fast for a 5500 lbs truck !
I can't believe I read this thread since your name is on it.
Kevin
Originally Posted by charlesA

damn, you gotta agree with that right there.

If he has enough money for a $12K stereo PLUS all these mods then I think he can afford a freakin' digital camera and post some pictures.
Kevin
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
just some interesting info that seems relevant
just some interesting info that seems relevant



