Some info - F150 Diesel confirmed!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-30-2007, 08:17 PM
jbrew's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor

Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: MI
Posts: 25,637
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
  #2  
Old 01-30-2007, 08:31 PM
boomerkj's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that could be fun.
 
  #3  
Old 01-30-2007, 09:31 PM
zx12-iowa's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: minnesota - ubetcha
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
3.8 diesel = no power. It will have torque but no hp. Bet you see 0-60 of 10 sec or more and same tow rating. marginally better mpg?
 
  #4  
Old 01-30-2007, 09:38 PM
PONY_DRIVER's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 1,034
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WTF? Yesterday it was a 4.4L today it's a 3.8L. WTFF FORD? Make up your effing minds, post the chit on the internet and get the eff one with it. Crap like this pizzes me off to no end. Quit flip flopping and do the right thing and for GOD's sake quite putting underpowered engines in vehicles. It's no wonder they loose $24k a minute.
 
  #5  
Old 01-30-2007, 10:47 PM
HiVoltage14.4's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive always loved Diesel's (had a Duramax). I will look into gettign one when they come out. I think it will be a success. Now if they will just drop the price of diesel some.
 
  #6  
Old 01-30-2007, 11:00 PM
mkinttrim's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Soldotna Alaska
Posts: 1,274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget they have to meet some damn strict CAFE averages buy 2010 and beyond. I wouldn't expect a hell of alot of power in the next several years.
 
  #7  
Old 01-31-2007, 12:35 AM
caseyg's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 was the next tier up and theres alot of companies who can't make the cut. that might be y ford keeps changing their mind. some diesels have made the cut and are still putting out the hp. i don't know about detriot or cummins but i do know caterpillar is meeting the standard and doing it pretty well.
 
  #8  
Old 01-31-2007, 12:58 AM
glc's Avatar
glc
glc is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 43,198
Received 761 Likes on 704 Posts
Look at the date on that blog - October 06. Yesterday's information is newer.
 
  #9  
Old 02-06-2007, 07:26 PM
Somis86's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SLO/ Somis
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I cant wait for the diesel F-150. if anyone else finds out more and newer stuff keep me posted.
 
  #10  
Old 02-07-2007, 12:46 PM
Faster150's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fort Worth,Tx
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zx12-iowa
3.8 diesel = no power. It will have torque but no hp. Bet you see 0-60 of 10 sec or more and same tow rating. marginally better mpg?

sounds like a 5.4 to me...
 
  #11  
Old 02-07-2007, 12:58 PM
Klitch's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Faster150
sounds like a 5.4 to me...
you mean a floor'6?
 
  #12  
Old 02-08-2007, 08:38 AM
Faster150's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Fort Worth,Tx
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Klitch
you mean a floor'6?

nope 4.6 has a balance of HP and torque.. 5.4 has alot of torque but marginal hp for his displacement
 
  #13  
Old 02-08-2007, 09:43 AM
JasonFX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Temple, Tx
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It wouldnt be so bad if they offered manual transmissions in something besides work trucks too.
 
  #14  
Old 02-13-2007, 09:24 AM
garthr2's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F150 Diesel ? ........ Hmmm, where I have this one before ?

2003

Oh yes, the so called Baby Powerstroke 4.5L V-6 that Ford decided not to put into the trucks after International had already built the plant in Huntsville, AL to manufacture them.

See these articles :

http://www.trucktrend.com/features/c...cs_torque.html

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articl...39/ai_99747877

Who knows what Ford will do, and who can trust they'll actually put it into trucks. Ford has got some work to do keep sales up.

From what I've read, the latest is a 4.4L V8 diesel , a massive 330hp and 700nm(516 ft/lb) of torque ! see here:

http://www.dieselforecast.com/Articl...?articleID=208
 
  #15  
Old 02-14-2007, 12:26 AM
rmeidlinger's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by zx12-iowa
3.8 diesel = no power. It will have torque but no hp. Bet you see 0-60 of 10 sec or more and same tow rating. marginally better mpg?

in the 60's big HP for diesel trucks was a 220 cummins- they would still do 80 on a a flat fully loaded.

ever get passed by an old Greyhound doing 85- good bet it was running a 6V71 . that's 426 cid

diesels are built so damn heavy due to the high compression ratio and torque output that if you give them enough cooling and enough turbo big horse power and torque numbers are acheivable. of course a diesel will never rev as fast as a gasser.

1952 Indy pole sitter was running a diesel.
 


Quick Reply: Some info - F150 Diesel confirmed!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 PM.