How many 02 sensors on a 94 5.8l?
#1
#4
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Memphis, TN 38135, USA, Earth
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Codes don't mean to change parts. They tell you where to begin the diagnosis. That's a lean code, and changing the sensor that detects it won't make the engine run richer. Step 1 is to determine if the exhaust is actually lean. If it's not, THEN you might suspect the sensor or EEC. But you probably have a vacuum leak.
The number of HO2Ss on that year depends on engine AND trans; i.e., is it MAF? How many large hoses connect to the top of the air filter cover: 1 or 2?
The number of HO2Ss on that year depends on engine AND trans; i.e., is it MAF? How many large hoses connect to the top of the air filter cover: 1 or 2?
#5
Thanks for your advice. I dont have a vacuum leak. Checked everything else. Not sure what else it could be.
The truck is a 94 5.8l 215k miles. Runs real strong. But has extremely rough idle, sometimes it smooths out. Sometimes going down the road when its colder out it will act like its missing part of the time. I get about 10mpg no matter how hard or easy i drive. It has new spark plugs and all the plug wires checked out on resistance. Cleaned the cap and rotor contacts. EGR valve moves freely.
Oh and I get the CEL about 5 minutes after driving it. Usually as the system gets up into the normal on the temp gauge. Then the CEL comes on.
The truck is a 94 5.8l 215k miles. Runs real strong. But has extremely rough idle, sometimes it smooths out. Sometimes going down the road when its colder out it will act like its missing part of the time. I get about 10mpg no matter how hard or easy i drive. It has new spark plugs and all the plug wires checked out on resistance. Cleaned the cap and rotor contacts. EGR valve moves freely.
Oh and I get the CEL about 5 minutes after driving it. Usually as the system gets up into the normal on the temp gauge. Then the CEL comes on.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Memphis, TN 38135, USA, Earth
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
If the oxygen sensor gave the EEC bad readings causing the EEC to run lean, then the oxygen sensor COULDN'T also detect that lean condition, because it's bad. Right? So the fact that it sets the code says it's not bad. And if it's good enough to detect the lean condition, then it's good, and doesn't need to be changed. Either way, it's not the CAUSE of the code, so changing it won't fix the code.
Read the books in the owner's manual pack. Oxygen sensors are NOT maintenance items. They don't simply go bad with age or miles. Mine has several hundred thousand miles on it, and it spent a year or 2 in a junkyard. It works fine.
You can't detect a vacuum leak by measuring manifold vacuum, and creating a new leak doesn't eliminate the possibility of another. Use a mechanic's stethoscope without the probe (or ~3' of garden hose) to listen all over the intake while the engine idles.
Why not look at things that can actually cause the lean condition? What's the fuel pressure? How old is the fuel filter? Is the fuel pressure regulator working? Are the injectors clogged? Are the plugs gapped correctly? Are they fouled? Is the coil good? Are the ECT, ACT, TPS, & MAP/MAF good?
You still haven't told us if the engine is MAF or not. What trans (read the caption below), and how many large hoses on the air filter cover?
Read the books in the owner's manual pack. Oxygen sensors are NOT maintenance items. They don't simply go bad with age or miles. Mine has several hundred thousand miles on it, and it spent a year or 2 in a junkyard. It works fine.
You can't detect a vacuum leak by measuring manifold vacuum, and creating a new leak doesn't eliminate the possibility of another. Use a mechanic's stethoscope without the probe (or ~3' of garden hose) to listen all over the intake while the engine idles.
Why not look at things that can actually cause the lean condition? What's the fuel pressure? How old is the fuel filter? Is the fuel pressure regulator working? Are the injectors clogged? Are the plugs gapped correctly? Are they fouled? Is the coil good? Are the ECT, ACT, TPS, & MAP/MAF good?
You still haven't told us if the engine is MAF or not. What trans (read the caption below), and how many large hoses on the air filter cover?
#10
#11
http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/92...-poor-mpg.html
heres a thread on FTE.
Fuel pressure is normal. And i doubt that fuel pressure is causing a rough idle, if it has enough to supply the truck at WOT.
heres a thread on FTE.
Fuel pressure is normal. And i doubt that fuel pressure is causing a rough idle, if it has enough to supply the truck at WOT.
#14
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Memphis, TN 38135, USA, Earth
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
EEC-IV & MAF aren't mutually exclusive. Some '94 5.8L w/E4OD are MAF. That's why I've asked how many hoses on the filter cover. Look at this:
The ECT has nothing to do with the gauge. The gauge uses the coolant temperature sender, which has a single R/W wire; the ECT is exclusively for the EEC and has 2 wires.The TABs aren't sensors. The TAB solenoid controls vacuum to the actual TAB valve (AirB, often part of a combination valve), which regulates total secondary (thermactor) air. Then the TAD determines if it goes upstream (into the heads) or downstream (to the cat).
.
There is no SD sensor on any vehicle that I'm aware of. There are 3 possible locations for the ACT/IAT sensor: in the filter cover (MAF only), in the #5 or #6 intake runner.
Here's an excerpt from pinpoint test H1:
The next few steps test fuel pressure, cylinder balance (injector flow), TAD function, and HO2S condition.
The ECT has nothing to do with the gauge. The gauge uses the coolant temperature sender, which has a single R/W wire; the ECT is exclusively for the EEC and has 2 wires.The TABs aren't sensors. The TAB solenoid controls vacuum to the actual TAB valve (AirB, often part of a combination valve), which regulates total secondary (thermactor) air. Then the TAD determines if it goes upstream (into the heads) or downstream (to the cat).
.
There is no SD sensor on any vehicle that I'm aware of. There are 3 possible locations for the ACT/IAT sensor: in the filter cover (MAF only), in the #5 or #6 intake runner.
Here's an excerpt from pinpoint test H1:
Originally Posted by Ford '94 F150 PCED for DTC172
Possible Causes:
-- Fuel injectors.
-- HO2S.
-- Secondary Air Injection (AIR) system.
-- PCV/Hose.
-- Vacuum.
-- CANP.
-- MAP sensor.
-- Electronic Ignition Coil Failure.
* Key off.
* Remove the PCV valve from the valve cover. Inspect both rocker cover hole and PCV for damage, sludge build up, blockage and movement of valve plunger. Service as necessary.
* Run Key On Engine Off (KOEO) and Key On Engine Running (KOER) Self-Tests.
* Address any continuous ignition DTCs before servicing KOER DTCs.
-- Fuel injectors.
-- HO2S.
-- Secondary Air Injection (AIR) system.
-- PCV/Hose.
-- Vacuum.
-- CANP.
-- MAP sensor.
-- Electronic Ignition Coil Failure.
* Key off.
* Remove the PCV valve from the valve cover. Inspect both rocker cover hole and PCV for damage, sludge build up, blockage and movement of valve plunger. Service as necessary.
* Run Key On Engine Off (KOEO) and Key On Engine Running (KOER) Self-Tests.
* Address any continuous ignition DTCs before servicing KOER DTCs.
Last edited by Steve83; 09-28-2010 at 02:05 PM.