BFG AT's....265's or 285's
BFG AT's....265's or 285's
LT265 70R17's or LT285 70R17's? BFG AT's. What is the difference between the two? Planning to put some on a 2004 F150 XL 4x4 with a daystar 2.5 inch lift in the front.
That's kind of what I thought.....I figured they were a bit taller, but I was worried about the width.....I didn't want a really wide tire. Would both of these tires' widths be the same if they were mounted on a 17" rim?
So basically the 285's are about 20 mm wider than the 265's....which is about the equivalent of an inch and a quarter or so. I think they have a better load rating too. Thanks
Trending Topics
I've just recently purchased a set of 285/70/17 BFG tires and put them on the mickey thompson classic II. which is 17x9. I filled up the wells and blew them out on the side as well. definetly go with the 285s, the only drawback to these tire is the Price, mine were 185 a tire.
I have no exact comparison because the stock tires didn't make it through the first tank of gas. Based on my prior F-150 experience, I think these tires are negatively affecting performance and fuel economy. I won't be buying these tires again. I drive aggressively. Some may not notice the differences.
I won't buy the BFG AT KO in 285/70R17 again for this truck. I'll go back to 265/70 and probably Revos again. I'm sure most people wouldn't notice the effects on performance, though. Keep in mind, I do drive aggressively.




