oil level

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 23, 2002 | 05:51 PM
  #1  
92Custom's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield, VA
oil level

the owners manual for my 'new' truck (1992 with 4.9) says 5 quarts of oil. I just bought a Chilton's today that says 6 quarts.

5 quarts brings it 1/8 inch below 'full' on the dipstick.
Should I just add another quart and scratch a new line on the dipstick?

thanks,
Matt
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2002 | 05:53 PM
  #2  
Donate54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
From: FL
just add until the dipstick reaches 'full'
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 07:45 AM
  #3  
Dennis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 0
I hope somebody with the same year and engine will give you a definitive answer. Until then, I suggest doing what Donate54 says.
 
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2002 | 12:16 PM
  #4  
2002gray-ghost's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: the beautiful wheat fields of Kansas...
I'd go w/the owners manual....I have a Haynes manual that lists the WRONG tranny fluid (Dextron vs. ATF +3) for my wife's Dodge Intrpeid.

I think Chiltons and Haynes are great for the mechanical fixes pics etc, but I don't think they put the same detail in the routine maintenance sections. I have found several errors throughout the yrs about plug gaps, fluid capacities etc.
 
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2002 | 01:26 PM
  #5  
K JONES's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: GEISMAR LOUISIANA
Cool

FORD TRUCKS HAVE BEEN USING SIX QUARTS SINCE THE EARLY 90'S PLUS FILTER, CATCH UP TO SPEED MAN.
 
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2002 | 01:51 PM
  #6  
STX/98's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 743
Likes: 1
From: Wylie, Texas
Originally posted by K JONES
FORD TRUCKS HAVE BEEN USING SIX QUARTS SINCE THE EARLY 90'S PLUS FILTER, CATCH UP TO SPEED MAN.
Well since he's talking about a '92 model 'early 90's' may or may not apply... How about catching up on what was asked?
 
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2002 | 04:48 PM
  #7  
92Custom's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield, VA
thanks guys...

Yeah, I know that this isn't a huge problem or anything, its just that I do know that dipsticks, contrary to popular belief, are not scientifically accurate measuring devices...

and while i am sure that 5 quarts are fine, I know that 6 quarts are better.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 25, 2002 | 05:29 PM
  #8  
Dennis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,233
Likes: 0
Well, overfilling isn't good either. In fact, in some ways, it's worse because you don't know it's a problem until it's too late. At lease with underfilling, you can hear the engine clattering.

When you overfill, the crankshaft hits the top of the oil and whips in air. If it goes on long enough, the oil turns into a thick frothy whipped up mess that doesn't lubricate the parts and the engine will seize.

If 6 qts doesn't make the level go over the full or max mark on the dipstick, then there shouldn't be any problem, assuming the dipstick is the proper one.
 
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2002 | 07:41 PM
  #9  
92Custom's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Chesterfield, VA
right, but...

What I was saying is this...

that oil pans are designed to hold a certain amount of oil before you get into any foaming problems (crank hitting oil)...this amount is independant of what the dipstick says.

dipsticks are very simple devices that give a 'more-or-less' correct measurement.

I meant that 6 quarts are better simply because that is 20% more lubricant, 20% more 'coolant', 20% more detergents...
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:00 AM.