4.6 v.s. 5.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 21, 2001 | 03:31 PM
  #16  
ronhop's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Milan, Il USA
Yeah, Mitch, would be good to know since getting gears and stuff for the 9.75 rear end is a pain. You can get covers now but ring/pinion sets are hard to come by.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2001 | 06:47 PM
  #17  
JMC's Avatar
JMC
Technical Article Contributor
25 Year Member
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 9,417
Likes: 11
From: Windsor,Ontario,Canada
Guys,

It is not HP that destroys rear ends it is torque. The 4.6 only puts out 290-293 lbs-ft of torque VS 330-350 for the 5.4.
That little 40-60 lbs-ft of troque is enough to blow the rear end with a manual. I know I have blown 3 in two trucks.


Regards

Jean Marc Chartier
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2001 | 12:46 AM
  #18  
jryager's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 513
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, NC
I would suspect that that torque difference is gonna make up for some of that tranny loss as well. If you look at the torque curves, the 4.6 falls off pretty quickly compared to the 5.4. Seems to me that the 4.6 manual might get the 5.4 auto on hole shot, but the 5.4 may catch up down the road.....
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2001 | 02:36 PM
  #19  
BROTHERDAVE's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 4
From: Friendswood Texas
i forgot, the v-6 guys will say v-6,
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2001 | 09:50 PM
  #20  
p_ferlow's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
From: W. Van., BC, Canada
If you pull anything heavy stay away from the 5-speed tranny. You probably will end up frying the clutch. The hardest part is getting a big trailer moving from a stop and the auto (I have a 4.6 auto 4x4, 3.55LS, S/C) definitely does a good job. Torque multiplication with the auto is what does it.

Sure, maybe a 5-spd beats an auto but who really cares. When you stomp on either one they both go pretty good. That's really all that matters isn't it.

From what I hear the 5.4 is a gas pig. The 4.6 likes to rev, not sure about the 5.4L. Test drive both at the dealer.

Get an auto for towing and slap a supercharger on it if you need more GO.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 03:04 PM
  #21  
hmustang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 3
From: Kansas side of the greater KC area
My 4.6 with auto is quick may be a little slower than a 4.6 with a 5speed and slower than the 5.4 but it is fast enough to get me where I need to go.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2001 | 03:53 PM
  #22  
2001 ORP's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: montreal, Canada
Talking I'm happy

I'm very happy with my 5.4l auto 4x4 it si more than fast enough for me. I think that the engine\transmission combo that makes the owner happy is the best for them in my case I don't tow alot but I'm in traffic so a manual would be a royal pain! I like my truck just the way it is lol
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2001 | 01:24 AM
  #23  
Stump-Jumper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Dalton, OH
Oh Boy!

The 4.6 with a 5 speed is going to have more hp hit the pavement than a 5.4 auto. That is just a fact! However, while the torque converter (in the auto) is eating up horse power it is also multiplying torque. So the 4.6 liter 5 speed isn't necessarily going to be faster. That wasn't the question. The question was which one would have more hp at the rear wheels. The answer is the 4.6 liter with the manual tranny!

BotherDave,
I think you are jumping to conclusions.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 09:03 AM
  #24  
2000regcab54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 445
Likes: 1
From: Shelby Twp., MI,USA
I just love these pissing contests.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 10:38 AM
  #25  
BROTHERDAVE's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 4
From: Friendswood Texas
stumpjumper.. maybe i am. it just seem that the 4.6 guys say they can beat the 5.4 and the v-6 guys say they can beat the 4.6 so that would make the v-6 the quickest. i think the quickest stock short wheel base regular cab truck i have seen is 15.7, the quickest 4.6 was 15.9 and the quickest (stock) v-6 is 15.9 (with a muffler upgrade) all from 260 h.p , 232 h.p. and 205 h.p.
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 11:37 AM
  #26  
JMC's Avatar
JMC
Technical Article Contributor
25 Year Member
Joined: Dec 1997
Posts: 9,417
Likes: 11
From: Windsor,Ontario,Canada
Here is my unbiased opinion. Under equal conditions the fastest Stock truck, ¼ mile unloaded, will be the reg cab work series with 4.6, 5 speed, 3.55 LSD. Put any other truck against and it will loose. Lightnings not included.

Regards

Jean Marc Chartier
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 12:20 PM
  #27  
black f150 offroad's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: Canada
are u guys serious when u say a 4.6 man puts down more horspower than a 5.4 auto? at what rpm? but who has more tourque. cant beleive a 4.6 will beat a 5.4, maybe close in horspower at higher rpm but tourque should be a differnt story- just like a 302 against a 351. in a race the 4.6 would be lighter so i could see it being closer, lighter trans, lighter diff, lighter engine.

I think for the fact these are trucks i would rather have the heavier diff, but i also have a 5.4 so as somone previously said people like what they have, i do know that a 5.4 is small in a superduty so image what would have happend if ford would have put a 4.6 in there - mind you some may say it is a good fit in the superduty but then they probably havent driven a powerstroke

all the f150 engines seem to like to rev - 4.2 and 4.6 seem to need to rev a bit more compared to the 5.4 before they put out power wich makes sense if you looke at the tourque.

Any way ford did not use the 4.6/4.2 man with the 5.4 because it would not handle the power so if ford is willing to loose customers because of that i feel they may have been on to something about the power handling capability of the trans, but then putting a pi 5.4 with a 4r70 when they used to ues the e40d doesent make much sensor either except for the fact that a e40d weights a lot more than a 4r70
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 01:29 PM
  #28  
Stump-Jumper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Dalton, OH
Cool Black F-150 Off Road

We are dead serious!
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 01:49 PM
  #29  
ronhop's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
From: Milan, Il USA
Stump-Jumper is right....
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2001 | 02:39 PM
  #30  
MitchF150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,506
Likes: 6
From: Puyallup, WA
Cool In the real world...........

This whole "mine is bigger then your's" and "mine is faster then your's" is pretty funny.

I'd guess that 90% of truck owners bought their trucks to use as a truck. So what do you do with a truck? Haul heavy stuff. What do you need to haul that heavy stuff? Torque. What engine has more torque? The 5.4. (I'm only talking stock, from the factory here.)

For the other 10% of truck owners who bought them to storm the avenues and get to the next stop light first, then a 5-speed would probably be the way to go. And HP is what you need for that.

Two different camps here. You can't compare a "hauling" truck to a "drag racing" truck. That whole Apples and Oranges thing...

Why do you think all the race teams are concerned with HP? You never hear them talking about torque........ At least I never have.

Both sides are correct here. So, option out your rig for the purpose you intend to use it for.


Happy Trucking to all!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 AM.