E85 anyone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 07:51 PM
  #31  
chester8420's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, Georgia
Originally Posted by ballinsoldier
Also, what do you mean when you say what goes into the production of ethanol (corn) is taxed more than oil? I'd say perhaps oil produced by foreign companies, but we also tax a ton per gallon of gas, something like 15% of the total price. If Exxon produces gas then they get taxed all over the place, not sure how it's any different with ethanol.
100% of the price of ethanol goes to the producers and shippers of the fuel. All of those people pay taxes on the proceeds, then the things they buy, they pay taxes on, their employees pay taxes, etc.... Do you understand what I'm trying to say? Not much of the money spent on E-85 leaves the country. And money that stays in the country gets taxed over and over
Originally Posted by glc
That's a temporary situation. It's far from the norm. I'll bet when your gas drops back down to $3.30 or so, E85 will still be sitting at $2.89.
It normally stays around $.60-$.70 cheaper than gasoline.
It was kida funny, during the gas shortage here, people were topping every kind of vehicle off with ethanol cause they couldn't get anything else!

Originally Posted by doubleplayer
Chester, where the hell have you found e85 in GA?
It's everywhere. The nearest one to you is in Dunwoody. (about 8 miles from your house) Theres some in Lawrenceville, Smyrna, Duluth.... About 15 or so in the Metro Atlanta area. This time last year there was only 1 in all of Georgia. And it was near my hometown in south georgia.

Originally Posted by 4.6 Punisher
I have not been able to fill up, ever, on E85 because I go no were near the available stations that sell it. I really would like to fill up on it a few times to make my own decision on it.
The nearest one to you is the one I frequent, in Smyrna.

This is the best way to locate them.

http://www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/stat...nd_station.php
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 12:53 AM
  #32  
01Roush's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: Oronoco, MN
Originally Posted by chester8420
Well, I'd love to grow switchgrass, but there isn't any money in it.
You continue to miss the point, there isn't money in it because special interests have continued to block funding for sources other than corn. If switchgrass were funded and subsidized like corn it would be an emerging industry.

How many stations do you see using E-10? Almost all of them in Georgia do. That alone is a big dent if you ask me!
Since you won't take it from me, here's another source that does the math to show that ALL of the corn grown in the U.S. would only replace 15% of the gas supply if ALL of the corn were processed for E85 usage.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/7013...-of-motor-fuel

Simple math then tells us that 33% usage of corn acres for E85, probably not a bad guess for a practical upper limit if more acres are planted in upcoming years (current usage is a little over 20%), would only make a 5% dent in the gas supply. Is 5% worth billions? Wouldn't that money be much better spent developing something that might actually become a long term solution?

You are very cynical.
Ya think? I see study after study showing how corn based E85 is not the answer, then I watch my governor and other politicians stand up there and tell us how great it is when, funny thing, I live in a corn growing state.

Do you know where and how sugarcane grows? It is a labor intensive crop, and (since it's a tropical plant) it probably wouldn't do good in most parts of the country....
Did I say grow sugarcane? Don't think so, only pointed out thats what Brazil uses when you shoved Brazil at me as an example of ethanol being good. There are MANY potential sources for ethanol production, from other plants and grasses to even garbage and things like the algae fermentation someone linked to a bit ago. Those other materials and technologies would be MUCH further along right now if special interests had not managed to keep corn as the main focus.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 10:10 AM
  #33  
firstimeFord's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
A new gas station just opened a few blocks from my house that sells E85.

regular (85) = $3.34
E85 = $2.49

this looks to be the typical price difference here in Colorado.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 11:30 AM
  #34  
malexander52's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 1
From: spring, texas
Small Wrld

Originally Posted by chester8420

The nearest one to you is the one I frequent, in Smyrna.

This is the best way to locate them.

http://www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/stat...nd_station.php
I just left your hood man. I spent the week in La Vergne installing the enterprise voice mail system for Ingram Books.
Just thought I would say howdy and what a nice place to visit there.
I did go to the Mexican place there in Smyrna, but being from Texas I can't say it was all that. Good service and price though!
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 12:39 PM
  #35  
chester8420's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,835
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, Georgia
Originally Posted by 01Roush
You continue to miss the point, there isn't money in it because special interests have continued to block funding for sources other than corn. If switchgrass were funded and subsidized like corn it would be an emerging industry.
For the last time!! THERE ARE NO SUBSIDIES SPECIFICALLY FOR CORN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ARE WRONG! The price of corn is a world market price.

Originally Posted by 01Roush
Is 5% worth billions? Wouldn't that money be much better spent developing something that might actually become a long term solution?
Corn is all we have right now. I don't understand why you can't grasp that! If there were grants or low interest loans for equipment to handle switchgrass, and build the infrastructure, and price support for a few years into the future, then it would takeoff. But as far as I know, there isn't.
Originally Posted by 01Roush
Ya think? I see study after study showing how corn based E85 is not the answer, then I watch my governor and other politicians stand up there and tell us how great it is when, funny thing, I live in a corn growing state.
It's a great thing for the environment and the economy. I did't say it would end the world's problems.

Originally Posted by 01Roush
There are MANY potential sources for ethanol production, from other plants and grasses to even garbage and things like the algae fermentation someone linked to a bit ago. Those other materials and technologies would be MUCH further along right now if special interests had not managed to keep corn as the main focus.
Whatever. Vote someone into office that isn't an oil man, and maybe we can move forward. Corn based ethanol is the only thing we have right now. I through arguing with you. I welcome a better solution.
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 01:24 PM
  #36  
01Roush's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: Oronoco, MN
Originally Posted by chester8420
For the last time!! THERE ARE NO SUBSIDIES SPECIFICALLY FOR CORN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ARE WRONG! The price of corn is a world market price.
Not CORN, corn based ETHANOL is subsidized by the government at $.51/gallon.

McCain has said he will end the subsidy, funny you must think he'll end something that doesn't exist...

http://www.minnpost.com/ronway/2008/..._world_buzzing

http://www.google.com/search?q=is+co...e7&rlz=1I7SUNA

Spend a few minutes, learn a few things....

Corn is all we have right now. I don't understand why you can't grasp that! If there were grants or low interest loans for equipment to handle switchgrass, and build the infrastructure, and price support for a few years into the future, then it would takeoff. But as far as I know, there isn't.
You just said much of what I've been saying, except you simply can't seem to grasp the reason why those things haven't been developed........ jeezus.....we need a 'bang head on wall' smiley.... Research, scientists, and the free market have not determined which forms of energy are most viable as alternatives to gasoline, government and special interests have pushed it largely one direction.

Whatever. Vote someone into office that isn't an oil man, and maybe we can move forward. Corn based ethanol is the only thing we have right now. I through arguing with you. I welcome a better solution.
You don't throw billions into something that isn't a viable answer just because its "all we have right now", I've heard that before and its a ridiculous statement. If you don't have the answer you concentrate on finding it, you don't just take a non-viable alternative and run with it. I agree 100% the oil men have to go, but I'm confused how you 'welcome a better solution' when you keep saying we already have it in corn based ethanol??

 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 01:41 PM
  #37  
01Roush's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: Oronoco, MN
Something else for you to chew on...

http://www.dtnethanolcenter.com/inde...0&mid=38&pid=2

The price of ethanol futures is $.23/gal lower than gas, yet the selling price is ~$1.00 per gallon cheaper.....the difference? Taxes and subsidies.....
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 08:17 PM
  #38  
greencrew's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,804
Likes: 9
From: Wisconsin
This week I drove down through Chicago to St Louis, 750 miles. I did not see any e85 along the way and filled up with e10.

I filled up with e10 today for $3.15. Woo hew, the price is dropping.
 
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 10:14 PM
  #39  
01Roush's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: Oronoco, MN
Originally Posted by greencrew
I filled up with e10 today for $3.15. Woo hew, the price is dropping.
Regular gas was $2.99 here yesterday....
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 12:03 AM
  #40  
4.6 Punisher's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,778
Likes: 10
From: Douglasville GA
$2.99?! People that live near me would kill for that price!
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 01:30 AM
  #41  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,530
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
It's down to $2.65 here this evening. That's for E10.
 
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 10:26 AM
  #42  
01Roush's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: Oronoco, MN
A very interesting article to read here...

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=13199


This is a technology that works with many different sources of fuel from wood waste to garbage to sugar, etc...., which means different regions can use whatever is dominantly available locally. The process produces ethanol with less emissions, more energy yield, and far less water used than current methods.

I'm sure there are a half dozen other technologies like this being worked on, stuff like this is where government funding should be headed...
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #43  
nick16's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
bad it gunks up your engine. ive never used it but im in highschool in auto and my teachers car runs on e85 and we took it apart so he could show us and wow was there alot of stuff in there. and if we all use e85 more people starve. when we started usin e85 a few years back more people overseas started starvin casue food production went down casue its all going in our gas so no to e85 lol
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #44  
4.6 Punisher's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,778
Likes: 10
From: Douglasville GA
Originally Posted by nick16
bad it gunks up your engine. ive never used it but im in highschool in auto and my teachers car runs on e85 and we took it apart so he could show us and wow was there alot of stuff in there. and if we all use e85 more people starve. when we started usin e85 a few years back more people overseas started starvin casue food production went down casue its all going in our gas so no to e85 lol
That's why we go with the algae method, unless people overseas eat oil producing algae of course.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:53 AM.