Should Ford Bring The F150 Back To The Basics??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 06:48 PM
  #31  
JohnHL's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by malexander52
Acetone.....
People laugh at this and I laugh right back. I consistently squeeze an extra 40 to 60 miles out of a tank of gas. 6 ounces per fill up and I am good to go. A small can of the stuff lasts for 10 fill ups. It costs me 8 dollars at Wal-Mart. Everytime I use it, it's like creating an extra 3 gallons of gas. At $3.00 per gallon, $9.00 per tank and ten fillups, thats like paying $8 to get $90 worth of gas!!!!!! My cats are fine and my exhaust smells so much better (not that I like to breath the $h|t. The oil looks pretty and the idle is stupidly smooth. What can I say, it really works and I have the mileage logs to prove it.
To Be continued
Are you sure about that acetone thing??

http://www.snopes.com/autos/techno/acetone.asp
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 07:15 PM
  #32  
ryan42680's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Londonderry, NH
I miss my old 86 F250 HD. 351W, no emissions, just edelbrock intake, carb, flowmasters out the side, no cats or anything to deal with. Barely a vaccum hose on that thing. I could sit on the fender with my legs inside the engine bay with room to spare to do whatever work I needed to. Of course the lift helped to clear up some room I'm sure! But man, those were the days when a truck was that, a truck, it didn't matter if the seat got torn, or the paint got scratched, it was a working vehicle. Sure today's are working too, but I hate seeing even the tiniest spot on my seats, and don't get me started about all the road salt on my truck right now!!!
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 10:15 PM
  #33  
Labnerd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 42
From: So. Texas
While this isn't staying with the subject matter, our fuel situation is strictly political and for greed. How about the technology is already available for your vehicle to run on a fuel that has few emmissions. The fuel mileage per HP is greater and it can be readily made............at home.............and you throw away the ingredients everyday. But you can't have it unless you make the system yourself. Why? Because the States wouldn't have the tax money from the fuel you make. The oil companies would lose Billions overnight and they would lose all of the political power they have. There is no fuel shortage folks. There is greed on a worldwide scale and you are the financial partner in their scheme.
Now staying with the subject matter, todays engines are far better than the ones from the 60's and 70's. They are cleaner, far more dependable, require far less maintenance, and use a lot less resourses per mile. Anybody remember having to tune the engine every 15-20,000 miles. Points, plugs, condenser, cap, rotor, and then you had to have a timing light and a dwell meter. Remember when a car with 60,000 miles was considered high mileage and would soon be needing an overhaul. Remember how you didn't drive thru high water or the dizzy would get wet and you had to get out in the water to push the rig out and then dry it out. How soon we forget those "good ol days".
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 10:44 PM
  #34  
cyclone vampire's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: great white north
I'm all for Ford going back to the basics, The now old moduler engines don't have the life span of the cast iron blocks, 302 351, 460, ect, Chevy has kept the old 283 alive with reasosnable up dates for the times.

I have excellant luck with the 4.2 in my 97 F-150, I think the 4.2 was a revised 3.8, my dad has a 94 F250 with a 460, walks all ove the new 3V 10 ( but so dose my hemi )

The old mans 460 kills my truck.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 07:15 AM
  #35  
JohnHL's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Labnerd
Now staying with the subject matter, todays engines are far better than the ones from the 60's and 70's. They are cleaner, far more dependable, require far less maintenance, and use a lot less resourses per mile. Anybody remember having to tune the engine every 15-20,000 miles. Points, plugs, condenser, cap, rotor, and then you had to have a timing light and a dwell meter. Remember when a car with 60,000 miles was considered high mileage and would soon be needing an overhaul. Remember how you didn't drive thru high water or the dizzy would get wet and you had to get out in the water to push the rig out and then dry it out. How soon we forget those "good ol days".
I would only say they're far better in certain categories. In other categories I'd make an argument their far worse. The engines/cars of today are very complicated and costly to repair when compared to yesterday's engines/cars. Gas mileage is only one aspect of it. IMO....the big factor of whether one gets good gas mileage or not is directly related to driving habits. I had one exhaust guy tell me when people get duals put on, the gas mileage will go down because people consciously like to step on the pedal to hear the rumble. After a while hearing the rumble becomes part of your subconscious driving habit. You pedal it without thinking about it. As crazy as it sounds, I think that idea has merit.

It would be nice to put my OBDII scanner back in storage.

John
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 09:12 AM
  #36  
fairlaner's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
20 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 16
From: Central Coast, California
In over 30 years of owning cars, I've never taken one to a repair shop (other than for tires and smog). One of the ways I've accomplished this is to only buy basic vehicles. I'm all for things like modern fuel injection and computerized ignition which seem to work well for a long time with minimal problems. I'm not so sure about things like overhead cams and COP's which seem to cause problems with minimal benefits (the main reason I bought a 4.2). In my opinion, what has really burdened newer vehicle is all the 'stuff' which comes on most of them. Power windows, seats, locks, mirrors, pedals, climate control systems, etc, etc, etc ... all add cost, weight and trouble (the main reason I bought a XL). I'm not a rich guy .. I've only bought two new cars and I've owned a lot of '$500 wonders', but my cars are always clean, straight and in good mechanical condition.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 12:33 PM
  #37  
malexander52's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 1
From: spring, texas
Logs

Originally Posted by JohnHL
Are you sure about that acetone thing??

http://www.snopes.com/autos/techno/acetone.asp
I can post some spread sheets later today for you to review. I don't have anything to gain. I have been testing for 18 months now. The only control I really don't have is what the tankers poor into the gas wells at the pump. I have used the same Texaco gas station by my house for these past 18 months unless I was away from home, then obviously it was a fill up elsewhere. The spread sheet will note that for you. Like I said, it is not a huge gain, but it is noticeable. I watched the myth busters "dis-prove" the acetone scenario. I really enjoy those guys and that show, however I was a bit unimpressed by their results. I do not recall the use of a scan gauge, nor do I recall that the vehicle was inspected to be running at peak efficiency. That being said, you will see from my records that the mileage increases do not appear until the third and fourth tanks.
BTW, I really dig the snopes website. Here is a link to another one called the "no brainers think tank" I think you will enjoy:
http://neubranderinc.com/blog/2007/0...soline-busted/
Anyway, the first two tanks of acetone i used didn't seem to make a difference, but that third tank really shocked me. Anyway man, I encourage anybody to give it a try. It's a whopping $8 from Wal Mart for the Klean Strip brand. You are not going to ruin any components of the car trying it out.
Let me know what you find after a few tanks if you do try.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 02:33 PM
  #38  
MercedesTech's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 0
From: Rohnert Park, CA
Originally Posted by Labnerd
While this isn't staying with the subject matter, our fuel situation is strictly political and for greed. How about the technology is already available for your vehicle to run on a fuel that has few emmissions. The fuel mileage per HP is greater and it can be readily made............at home.............and you throw away the ingredients everyday. But you can't have it unless you make the system yourself. Why? Because the States wouldn't have the tax money from the fuel you make. The oil companies would lose Billions overnight and they would lose all of the political power they have. There is no fuel shortage folks. There is greed on a worldwide scale and you are the financial partner in their scheme.
Now staying with the subject matter, todays engines are far better than the ones from the 60's and 70's. They are cleaner, far more dependable, require far less maintenance, and use a lot less resourses per mile. Anybody remember having to tune the engine every 15-20,000 miles. Points, plugs, condenser, cap, rotor, and then you had to have a timing light and a dwell meter. Remember when a car with 60,000 miles was considered high mileage and would soon be needing an overhaul. Remember how you didn't drive thru high water or the dizzy would get wet and you had to get out in the water to push the rig out and then dry it out. How soon we forget those "good ol days".
Its so true its scary.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 02:41 PM
  #39  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,531
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
I'm with ya there, Fairlaner!

I don't do my own work any more, but I think having a basic vehicle is keeping my maintenance expenses in reasonable check. My truck is almost a clone of yours - it's only a 4x2, but it's a 4.2, manual trans, XL, and the only creature comforts that aren't standard are a stereo, cruise, AC, and tilt wheel. It's even the same dirt color!

I am fortunately in a position for the first time in my life to buy any vehicle I wanted, but I like my basic truck!
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 03:45 PM
  #40  
malexander52's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 1
From: spring, texas
Uploading file

I would like to post the Acetone Log (excel file) I have but I don't know how.
Also I would like to post a picture of my truck in my sig. Can anyone help?
Thanks
p.s. I created my gallery today.
 
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #41  
MercedesTech's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 0
From: Rohnert Park, CA
^^ I remember when MythBusters did the Acetone thing. They came back with little to no improvements as I recall.

It would be interesting to see how your results compare/differ
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34 AM.