Old Apr 13, 2015, 12:41 PM
How-Tos on this Topic
Last edit by: IB Advertising
Interested in increasing the horsepower in your 5.4L? Forum members suggest various methods to increase horsepower. The methods include:

          Read the full discussion below to find out the preferred methods.
          Print Wikipost

          Increasing 5.4L Horsepower

          Thread Tools
           
          Search this Thread
           
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 03:24 PM
            #16  
          NastyNate's Avatar
          Thread Starter
          |
          Member
          Joined: Nov 2007
          Posts: 50
          Likes: 1
          From: Marrero, LA
          Yeah. I'm just a college student right now so I'm trying to keep my expectations realistic.
           
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 05:13 PM
            #17  
          01Roush's Avatar
          Senior Member
          Joined: Jul 2005
          Posts: 575
          Likes: 0
          From: Oronoco, MN
          Originally Posted by mSaLL150
          with 3000 bucks, long tube headers, true dual exhaust, high flow cats, Cold Air Intake, Underdrive Pulleys, Belts, E-Fans, and a custom tune from Troyer Performance. You will be very impressed. You could easily see a gain of 80-100 rwhp with all of these mods.
          80-100rwhp with those mods???? I must have missed where you mentioned the nitrous kit.... I would more realistically expect around 50rwhp....
           
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 05:44 PM
            #18  
          cowboy63645's Avatar
          Senior Member
          Joined: Oct 2006
          Posts: 375
          Likes: 0
          From: Fredericktown, Missouri
          built5.4 got 30 HP just out of his long tube headers....so you add that to a programmer, e-fans, etc.etc.etc. then yes, you can make AROUND 100 HP, but expect more around 70-80
           
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 05:50 PM
            #19  
          mSaLL150's Avatar
          Technical Article Contributor
          Joined: Aug 2006
          Posts: 7,862
          Likes: 0
          From: Northern California
          Originally Posted by 01Roush
          80-100rwhp with those mods???? I must have missed where you mentioned the nitrous kit.... I would more realistically expect around 50rwhp....
          built54 had the older 5.4L engine as well, and with all those mods saw over 100rwhp gains....
           
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 06:29 PM
            #20  
          INFireRedF150's Avatar
          Senior Member
          Joined: Apr 2007
          Posts: 379
          Likes: 0
          From: Granger, IN
          Originally Posted by mSaLL150
          built54 had the older 5.4L engine as well, and with all those mods saw over 100rwhp gains....

          Built54 had a 1998 and the OP has a 1999 so basically the same motor for all intents and purposes. To get any obviously noticeable gains a truck owner would probably do what the OP is considering and that is to start with a minimum of $3000 or so and make many mods and get a tune to take all the mods into account.

          Built54 also had Comp Cams and raised his compression to 10.5:1. Prior to his engine swap, he was running about 265 RWHP and 325 RWTQ, not easy numbers to achieve with only things like cat-backs, CAI's, and a tune. Much more has to be done. Takes $$$ to play.
           
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 07:11 PM
            #21  
          01Roush's Avatar
          Senior Member
          Joined: Jul 2005
          Posts: 575
          Likes: 0
          From: Oronoco, MN
          Originally Posted by INFireRedF150
          Built54 had a 1998 and the OP has a 1999 so basically the same motor for all intents and purposes. To get any obviously noticeable gains a truck owner would probably do what the OP is considering and that is to start with a minimum of $3000 or so and make many mods and get a tune to take all the mods into account.

          Built54 also had Comp Cams and raised his compression to 10.5:1. Prior to his engine swap, he was running about 265 RWHP and 325 RWTQ, not easy numbers to achieve with only things like cat-backs, CAI's, and a tune. Much more has to be done. Takes $$$ to play.
          Including a PI swap, no? I'm also very skeptical about the 30/35 he throws around in every exhaust thread, not that I have any reason to think he'd lie about it but I've never seen results anything like that from any other modular vehicle, truck, Mustang, etc..... I sure as hell wouldn't buy headers and cats expecting 30/35 at the wheels from it. Again, I have no reason to doubt built54, but those results are NOT typical from just headers and cats. I asked in a recent thread to confirm that nothing else was done at the same time (even changing wheels/tires) and didn't get a reply, I'd still like confirmation on that....
           
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 07:55 PM
            #22  
          built54's Avatar
          Senior Member
          Joined: Jul 2006
          Posts: 6,282
          Likes: 1
          From: Farmington, MO
          Originally Posted by 01Roush
          Including a PI swap, no? I'm also very skeptical about the 30/35 he throws around in every exhaust thread, not that I have any reason to think he'd lie about it but I've never seen results anything like that from any other modular vehicle, truck, Mustang, etc..... I sure as hell wouldn't buy headers and cats expecting 30/35 at the wheels from it. Again, I have no reason to doubt built54, but those results are NOT typical from just headers and cats. I asked in a recent thread to confirm that nothing else was done at the same time (even changing wheels/tires) and didn't get a reply, I'd still like confirmation on that....
          actually i did see a true 30hp/35ftlbs. I had the PI head swap, comp cams, higher compression, all the bolt ons and custom tuning. Im not just "throwing it around". I dont recall where you asked if anything else was done?
           
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 08:10 PM
            #23  
          01Roush's Avatar
          Senior Member
          Joined: Jul 2005
          Posts: 575
          Likes: 0
          From: Oronoco, MN
          Originally Posted by built54
          actually i did see a true 30hp/35ftlbs. I had the PI head swap, comp cams, higher compression, all the bolt ons and custom tuning. Im not just "throwing it around". I dont recall where you asked if anything else was done?
          I was trying to word things carefully, but its hard to express extreme skepticism without it coming off poorly....hopefully it wasn't taken as an insult. There was some exhaust thread a few weeks ago where I asked you to confirm that the only changes made at that time were the headers and cats, no tuner, no other parts, no wheel swaps in between dyno sessions, etc.... I wasn't meaning to say I thought you avoided the question, you probably just didn't see it. That being said, I will still claim to the end that those results are NOT typical for those parts, and so therefore I hate to see those numbers thrown out everytime someone mentions longtubes as I think it creates false expectations. Case in point being this thread....someone parrots those numbers, adds up a bunch of other gains, and all of a sudden you can gain 80-100rwhp from bolt-ons and a tune....yikes...

          Believe me I'd like to think I could throw longtubes on and pick up 30 at the wheels, but I've seen a lot of dyno results on mod motors and and haven't seen any of them pick up anywhere near that much with longtubes. I would love to have that opinion change if shown that those are typical results....
           
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 08:10 PM
            #24  
          01Roush's Avatar
          Senior Member
          Joined: Jul 2005
          Posts: 575
          Likes: 0
          From: Oronoco, MN
          Originally Posted by built54
          actually i did see a true 30hp/35ftlbs. I had the PI head swap, comp cams, higher compression, all the bolt ons and custom tuning. Im not just "throwing it around". I dont recall where you asked if anything else was done?
          I was trying to word things carefully, but its hard to express extreme skepticism without it coming off poorly....hopefully it wasn't taken as an insult. There was some exhaust thread a few weeks ago where I asked you to confirm that the only changes made at that time were the headers and cats, no tuner, no other parts, no wheel swaps in between dyno sessions, etc.... I wasn't meaning to say I thought you avoided the question, you probably just didn't see it. That being said, I will still claim to the end that those results are NOT typical for those parts, and so therefore I hate to see those numbers thrown out everytime someone mentions longtubes as I think it creates false expectations. Case in point being this thread....someone parrots those numbers, adds up a bunch of other gains, and all of a sudden you can gain 80-100rwhp from bolt-ons and a tune....yikes...

          Believe me I'd like to think I could throw longtubes on and pick up 30 at the wheels, but I've seen a lot of dyno results on mod motors and and haven't seen any of them pick up anywhere near that much with longtubes. I would love to have that opinion change if shown that those are typical results....
           
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 08:14 PM
            #25  
          built54's Avatar
          Senior Member
          Joined: Jul 2006
          Posts: 6,282
          Likes: 1
          From: Farmington, MO
          yeah nothing else was changed, but I agree, most may not see that, but then again, i have not heard anyone else do a b4 and after dyno with lts
           
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 08:16 PM
            #26  
          ELVATO's Avatar
          Senior Member
          Joined: May 2007
          Posts: 2,101
          Likes: 0
          From: Orlando
          Yea, I remember reading that thread where you asked that question as I was curious as well.

          Also, if the OP has bigger tires, maybe gears should be considered?

          EDIT: I see built54 posted an answer to my question. Also, I see my browser is showing two different sigs for him. I don't know if it's this site, or my computer that always displays sigs weird.
           

          Last edited by ELVATO; Nov 14, 2007 at 08:19 PM.
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 08:18 PM
            #27  
          built54's Avatar
          Senior Member
          Joined: Jul 2006
          Posts: 6,282
          Likes: 1
          From: Farmington, MO
          yeah gears would make it feel faster
           
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 08:31 PM
            #28  
          Neal's Avatar
          Senior Member
          Joined: Jan 1999
          Posts: 7,030
          Likes: 3
          From: WINDSOR, ONTARIO, CANADA
          Cool

          Originally Posted by top2002
          I wish we could buy this engine.
          http://www.fpv.com.au/cars/force-6--...on/engine.aspx
          I believe the engine is 388 HP without a SC or Turbo.
          HI!... Well if thats 388FWH.P then I'm not too impressed. I made 354RWH.P (430H.P flywheel)with 8.4:1 compression and turbo grind cams in N/A trim.
           
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 08:35 PM
            #29  
          Neal's Avatar
          Senior Member
          Joined: Jan 1999
          Posts: 7,030
          Likes: 3
          From: WINDSOR, ONTARIO, CANADA
          Cool

          HI!... If you got $3000 to spend then I would get a set of FOX LAKE stage II heads and some custom COMP CAMS. Then work with the smaller bolt ons from there. I picked up 103RWH.P with my custom heads and cams. But remember I had every bolt on possible running in conjunction with the heads and cams.
           
          Reply
          Old Nov 14, 2007 | 09:33 PM
            #30  
          B-Man's Avatar
          Senior Member
          Joined: Dec 2002
          Posts: 1,558
          Likes: 3
          From: Eastern TN
          Originally Posted by 01Roush
          80-100rwhp with those mods???? I must have missed where you mentioned the nitrous kit.... I would more realistically expect around 50rwhp....
          ^ X2 !!! ^

          You get roughly 115 FWHP by bolting on a blower, much less the mods listed earlier...

          2001 5.4L N/A - 265 HP

          2001 5.4L S/C (Lightning) - 380 HP

          To make more power, you gotta get more fuel and air into the engine - bolting on headers and pulleys and such, even with a tune, will not get you a 100 RWHP increase.

          Cams, heads, higher compression, etc. is what you would need, along with the earlier mentioned bolt-ons. I agree with 01Roush - the headers offer the least bang for the buck.

          We should all take up a collection and pay for Built54 to re-dyno his beast - 1st as-is, then with the headers removed and stock manifolds installed.

          I too find it VERY unusual to see such a gain - it makes me think there was an error made in measurement, set-up or something between the two pulls.

          No flame, but that is the ONLY mod motor I've ever seen that is supposed to have improved so dramatically with a header install.

          I wish I had that kind of luck with mods....
           
          Reply



          All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 AM.