Break-in and MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 01:47 PM
  #31  
()smoke()'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by glc
I doubt any difference would be as great as normal variance between particular engines. Let's take 2 IDENTICAL trucks - and drive them side by side EXACTLY the same way from day 1 - I'd bet the mileage will not be identical.

Had a friend years ago with a Taurus wagon with a 3.0 - it never got better than 21 MPG on the highway - the expected mileage *should* have been around 27 - he had the thing dissected with a fine toothed comb and absolutely EVERYTHING was within specs.
i don't think i'm comminicating effectively--i doubt it too, i'm just saying that i'm curious to see if the results are within our assumptions

on a related note, i've always gotten better fuel economy than the epa rating in every vehicle i've ever driven--even upwards of 20% better in some cases with manual trans, so i'm not entirely sold on the idea that i've always driven a 'good' example of each vehicle...imo, there are too many variables to discern one deciding factor, although i do think that the driver is the biggest variable
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #32  
Fifty150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 28
From: The Barbary Coast
What's the big deal?

We drive trucks, right?

You want better mileage, you get a Honda.
 
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2007 | 09:13 PM
  #33  
()smoke()'s Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by Fifty150
What's the big deal?

We drive trucks, right?

You want better mileage, you get a Honda.

i don't drive a truck, but i have relatives and friends who do--maybe you've met them?...and thanks for the comment, but i'll stick with my briggs & stratton
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM.