E85

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 12:00 AM
  #16  
hllon4whls's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
From: Mandeville, La
Some info on ethanol as a fuel: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol#As_a_fuel

Hydrogen as a fuel is a pipe dream. Most of the earths hydrogen is going to be in a chemically bonded state. H20 is readily available, however it is very stable. We are putting way more energy into the seperation of hydrogen than we get out of burning it.

There is no perfect solution including gasoline, etc. Had we chosen to go with ethanol 100 years ago, we would have tweaked the efficiency of the production process by now ans possibly had smaller, high compression or boosted engines to help make up somewhat for the lower overall energy content of the fuel.
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 12:03 AM
  #17  
hllon4whls's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
From: Mandeville, La
Originally Posted by Jesse H
True, but unless a motor warrants higher octane (forced induction, advanced timing, high compression) the higher octane isn't helping.
Possibly the factory tune is cranking the timing up to take advantage of the higher octane and knock reduction.
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 12:55 AM
  #18  
Klitch's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 5
From: Washington
Originally Posted by chester8420
I'd run it if I had a FFV truck. I have run up to 43% in my 97' with slight tuning changes, but I haven't been able to run pure E85. My uncle runs it all the time in his Tahoe. He says he looses about 3mpg when running it.

It's a small gas station in Perry, Exit 135 I think. Stop in and try a tank. See if you like it or not. I did. My truck ran VERY smooth and much more quiet. It's usually $.30-$.35 a gallon cheaper than regular. This weekend it was $2.03/gallon or so....
you guys are lower than us red necks in idaho? we just creeped up over the last month from 225 to 266... im pissed.
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 03:03 PM
  #19  
malexander52's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 1
From: spring, texas
Originally Posted by Bmartinc
try it for a lil bit, see how it handles, remember E-85 is 105 octane, In my moms 2000 minivan, 3.3Lv6 Runs it stock, big power difference, thats why you can catch her going 120 mph, Fuel mileage we didn't really notice much diff, Maybe a mile per gallon difference, That could be because its a 3.3 L who knows.
Thats impossible
E-85 contains less thermal energy than gasoline. It has been demonstrated to reduce power and mileage, not increase it.
It is NOT 105 octane. Get you figures right, In fact higher octane requires higher compression to perform. Flex fuel vehicles typically run lower compression.
Duh
You're making up stuff.
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2007 | 03:09 PM
  #20  
malexander52's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 1
From: spring, texas
Originally Posted by hllon4whls
Some info on ethanol as a fuel: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol#As_a_fuel

Hydrogen as a fuel is a pipe dream. Most of the earths hydrogen is going to be in a chemically bonded state. H20 is readily available, however it is very stable. We are putting way more energy into the seperation of hydrogen than we get out of burning it.

There is no perfect solution including gasoline, etc. Had we chosen to go with ethanol 100 years ago, we would have tweaked the efficiency of the production process by now ans possibly had smaller, high compression or boosted engines to help make up somewhat for the lower overall energy content of the fuel.
Ever heard of electroloysis?
You pass and electric curreet through water to seperate hydrogen from the oxygen.
The process of using the PEM system is inefficeint compared to its actual output but there are other systems currently in use.
If it is such a pipe dream then why has the us government (the airforce) awarded fuell cell development to mellineum cell technology that currently holds the patent for hydrogen on demand?
Here, go educate your self.
Do you work for an oil company by chance?
http://www.millenniumcell.com/fw/main/default.asp
http://finance.google.com/finance?q=MCEL
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/...ap3595518.html
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 11:20 AM
  #21  
fallingUP's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Illnois
dont use it, less ya have to.
i used 1 full tank, i lost at least 3-5 miles per gal.
and yes you can feel a difference, it felt like it had a tuner on it and the response was better.
My truck ? doubt it.
the reason i say dont use it, my truck still hasnt returned to the mpg i got before usin it and ive already refilled with reg 87 4 or 5 times .
havent really had highway miles since usin it, im going on 1000 mile trip friday hoping maybe to see an increase in mpg. also added siso catback since then.

i dont know bout 105 octane but it is higher.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 12:28 PM
  #22  
PONY_DRIVER's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
From: VA
We have mandatory 10% ethanol content in VA, at least in my area, now. My truck seems to be a little more sluggish and mileage isn't quite what it used to be. Just my observations.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2007 | 07:56 PM
  #23  
cavinandpavin's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: yadkin NC
Originally Posted by PONY_DRIVER
We have mandatory 10% ethanol content in VA, at least in my area, now. My truck seems to be a little more sluggish and mileage isn't quite what it used to be. Just my observations.
we have that here in denver +85 octane gas +being a mile high= less power and less mpg when we mover out here i couldnt belive my truck wouldnt sqawll the tires from a stop light
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 PM.