replace my fuel injectors???
#16
Originally Posted by chester8420
Your wallet.
Go ahead and do what you want. It probably won't break the truck even though the owner's manual says don't do it.
Just presenting my point of view. Which I did, so I'll stop here.
Just for kicks.... The next time you change your fuel filter, cut it open, and see how much sludge/varnish etc. is in it...
Go ahead and do what you want. It probably won't break the truck even though the owner's manual says don't do it.
Just presenting my point of view. Which I did, so I'll stop here.
Just for kicks.... The next time you change your fuel filter, cut it open, and see how much sludge/varnish etc. is in it...
So far I have had 4 trucks with injectors and put a total of 400,000 miles on them. 160k on one alone. Never have I had to replace an injector. Cleaned multiple times, but never replaced.
Last edited by kingfish51; 03-14-2007 at 08:29 PM.
#18
Originally Posted by kingfish51
You say to replace them as cleaning is a waste.
5. You'll get a CEL when an injector stops up.
But that being said, do whatever makes you happy. It doesn't really matter about the truck, as long as you sleep good at night!
#20
#21
#22
Originally Posted by zambonimaxx
O.K. cool! What if I want to change them to gain performance? What would I have to do in order to have the mod's needed to change them to a higher performance?? Thanks agian for clearing it up
~Phil
~Phil
What modifications do you have in mind?
#23
Chester; perhaps you had better go do some homework. The computer does not have any idea if an injector has fired properly or not; All it knows is that the injector has constant power, and is grounded to be opened. If those two things happen, the PCM assumes the injector is working correctly. Fuel lines don't get varnished, or 'sludged' as you put it, because their always full of fuel! The absence of fuel on an injector for the 1/100th of a second over a few years WILL cause varnish, no matter how you look at it. Why do you think fuel tanks rot out? Filter screens are just that- Filters. They ARE serviced in any good shop, and any GOOD technician knows this.
The best way to get more power, is to give the vehicle more fuel. Whether it's higher fuel pressure or more volume, That's the key. So Stock injectors are not the best for power/performance. Plugging the pressure regulators vacuum supply will yield 10 PSI more pressure, therefore improving power, but drastically reducing fuel economy. The injectors on Ford vehicles from about '97 to present are of the saturated style. They are synchronus, which means they are timed to the ignition, or the event. (spark, squirt)
Besides a tuning chip, or a tuner program, the best bang for buck is fuel delivery for performance.
The best way to get more power, is to give the vehicle more fuel. Whether it's higher fuel pressure or more volume, That's the key. So Stock injectors are not the best for power/performance. Plugging the pressure regulators vacuum supply will yield 10 PSI more pressure, therefore improving power, but drastically reducing fuel economy. The injectors on Ford vehicles from about '97 to present are of the saturated style. They are synchronus, which means they are timed to the ignition, or the event. (spark, squirt)
Besides a tuning chip, or a tuner program, the best bang for buck is fuel delivery for performance.
#24
Originally Posted by 1994f150XLT
Chester; perhaps you had better go do some homework. The computer does not have any idea if an injector has fired properly or not; All it knows is that the injector has constant power, and is grounded to be opened. If those two things happen, the PCM assumes the injector is working correctly. Fuel lines don't get varnished, or 'sludged' as you put it, because their always full of fuel! The absence of fuel on an injector for the 1/100th of a second over a few years WILL cause varnish, no matter how you look at it. Why do you think fuel tanks rot out? Filter screens are just that- Filters. They ARE serviced in any good shop, and any GOOD technician knows this.
The best way to get more power, is to give the vehicle more fuel. Whether it's higher fuel pressure or more volume, That's the key. So Stock injectors are not the best for power/performance. Plugging the pressure regulators vacuum supply will yield 10 PSI more pressure, therefore improving power, but drastically reducing fuel economy. The injectors on Ford vehicles from about '97 to present are of the saturated style. They are synchronus, which means they are timed to the ignition, or the event. (spark, squirt)
Besides a tuning chip, or a tuner program, the best bang for buck is fuel delivery for performance.
The best way to get more power, is to give the vehicle more fuel. Whether it's higher fuel pressure or more volume, That's the key. So Stock injectors are not the best for power/performance. Plugging the pressure regulators vacuum supply will yield 10 PSI more pressure, therefore improving power, but drastically reducing fuel economy. The injectors on Ford vehicles from about '97 to present are of the saturated style. They are synchronus, which means they are timed to the ignition, or the event. (spark, squirt)
Besides a tuning chip, or a tuner program, the best bang for buck is fuel delivery for performance.
https://www.f150online.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=276882
#25
The computer knows if an injector sprayed or not through information gained from the missfire monitor. I don't feel like writing an essay today on how it works. But put it simply, if you had a stopped up injector, that particular compression stroke would not yield the "correct" crankshaft acceleration, and that would be detected by the missfire monitor.
Bluegrass knows his stuff. Read the post that oneloaf gave you.
I don't necessairly agree with this statement ..
But I don't have time to argue it right now. I don't see bigger injectors helping anything until you have a need for them. It's not a diesel.
Bluegrass knows his stuff. Read the post that oneloaf gave you.
I don't necessairly agree with this statement ..
Originally Posted by 1994f150XLT
The best way to get more power, is to give the vehicle more fuel. Whether it's higher fuel pressure or more volume, That's the key. So Stock injectors are not the best for power/performance.
#26
Originally Posted by chester8420
I don't see bigger injectors helping anything until you have a need for them. It's not a diesel.
Read post #9 in the post below.
https://www.f150online.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=273321
#27
Originally Posted by 1994f150XLT
Chester; perhaps you had better go do some homework. The computer does not have any idea if an injector has fired properly or not; All it knows is that the injector has constant power, and is grounded to be opened. If those two things happen, the PCM assumes the injector is working correctly. Fuel lines don't get varnished, or 'sludged' as you put it, because their always full of fuel! The absence of fuel on an injector for the 1/100th of a second over a few years WILL cause varnish, no matter how you look at it. Why do you think fuel tanks rot out? Filter screens are just that- Filters. They ARE serviced in any good shop, and any GOOD technician knows this.
The best way to get more power, is to give the vehicle more fuel. Whether it's higher fuel pressure or more volume, That's the key. So Stock injectors are not the best for power/performance. Plugging the pressure regulators vacuum supply will yield 10 PSI more pressure, therefore improving power, but drastically reducing fuel economy. The injectors on Ford vehicles from about '97 to present are of the saturated style. They are synchronus, which means they are timed to the ignition, or the event. (spark, squirt)
Besides a tuning chip, or a tuner program, the best bang for buck is fuel delivery for performance.
The best way to get more power, is to give the vehicle more fuel. Whether it's higher fuel pressure or more volume, That's the key. So Stock injectors are not the best for power/performance. Plugging the pressure regulators vacuum supply will yield 10 PSI more pressure, therefore improving power, but drastically reducing fuel economy. The injectors on Ford vehicles from about '97 to present are of the saturated style. They are synchronus, which means they are timed to the ignition, or the event. (spark, squirt)
Besides a tuning chip, or a tuner program, the best bang for buck is fuel delivery for performance.
#28
Well remember that there's no replacement for displacement - a bigger pintle is a bigger pintle, regardless. But yes, plugging the Regulator vaccum line will not control fuel pressure, resulting in higher output pressure from the pump - Approximately 10psi. Kind of a backyard trick, but it works - but you'll be giving up economy, remember. Just try it, See if you like it. It's completely reversible. For that stock look, I've used a ball bearing pushed up inside, and then you can just put the hose back on. If you just want to try it, Use a Golf Tee.
-Jimi
-Jimi
#30
Well you guys are beginning to spar and get out in left field a bit.
Injectors are sized to fuel the HP the engine is designed to produce.
Just replacing with larger capacity units dosn't increase power. Only with diesels can you do that.
The why of it is simple when you take into account that no more air is used to make more power. At less than WOT the ox sensors keep an A/F ratio at 14.6 to 1, so incressing the injector size or raising the fuel pressure just makes the PCM shut them down more when the OX sensors detect the extra richeness.
At WOT. the best A/F around 12 to 13 to 1 gets too rich again and 'may' reduce power for no other reason and burn more fuel.
Another thing you can get into with injectors to big is the min and max. opening pulsewidths are taken out of proper design limits.
A bigger injector flowing to much fuel is shut down below it's min reliable fuel metering then metering become non-linear while the max power pulsewidths are operated off fixed tables in the PCM and not the OX sensors. This in itself can make WOT fueling too rich because the PCM does not know anything about the injector "size", only that something is there by electrical monitors.
The miss fire detectors don't have much to do with the injectors directly.
The missfire monitor detects the time of the power stroke and detects it as a missfire if it become to slow when compaired to internal PCM history and expected times. When the power contribution is down, the monitor assumes the cylinder is missfiring for whatever reason, a bad plug, COP, boot, plug wire, coil module, injector, water in the fuel or anything that interfers with combustion. It can't tell what the 'exact' cause is.
As for injector spray patterns changing over time. It's common knowledge that over time the patterns can change from seat wear, carbon formations on the tips, gum from a leaking injector, acids in the gas that will still flow by a filter, crank case oil intake from the PCV, engine cylinders that stop with the intake valve open exposing the injector to heat before cool down and sometimes reversion flow back out of the cylinder. This is how the under sides of an intake valve can carbon up. It's also part the temp of the parts where a cooler surface can collect these things. Over time, carbon can soak up part of the injector flow and never reach the cylinder.
Mass Air control can account for a lot before it gets to far out of hand but Speed Density engine control cannot account for these things very well because the engine is running on a computer model program that can't account for some things because it has no way to do so..
So bottom line is, in the real world, injectors do go 'south' over time for several reasons. You may never feel it because there is nothing to 'constantly' compair with until they are ether cleaned, fail in some manner or replaced. While this is all going on, the PCM program can in most cases correct for poor operation by up to 20%. This keeps you from feeling the effects until the program can't correct any futher.
The old carbed engines suffered from poor valve seal when aged, become hard starting etc. Notice nobody complains about needing a valve job any more because FI covers it up until they get so bad the power takes dive.
The valve seal lasts so long now because of the precision of fuel injection and the cooling the intake valve gets and the much better condtions the exhaust valves have to live in.
Ahh, computer programs that learn until their limits are reached!
Injectors are sized to fuel the HP the engine is designed to produce.
Just replacing with larger capacity units dosn't increase power. Only with diesels can you do that.
The why of it is simple when you take into account that no more air is used to make more power. At less than WOT the ox sensors keep an A/F ratio at 14.6 to 1, so incressing the injector size or raising the fuel pressure just makes the PCM shut them down more when the OX sensors detect the extra richeness.
At WOT. the best A/F around 12 to 13 to 1 gets too rich again and 'may' reduce power for no other reason and burn more fuel.
Another thing you can get into with injectors to big is the min and max. opening pulsewidths are taken out of proper design limits.
A bigger injector flowing to much fuel is shut down below it's min reliable fuel metering then metering become non-linear while the max power pulsewidths are operated off fixed tables in the PCM and not the OX sensors. This in itself can make WOT fueling too rich because the PCM does not know anything about the injector "size", only that something is there by electrical monitors.
The miss fire detectors don't have much to do with the injectors directly.
The missfire monitor detects the time of the power stroke and detects it as a missfire if it become to slow when compaired to internal PCM history and expected times. When the power contribution is down, the monitor assumes the cylinder is missfiring for whatever reason, a bad plug, COP, boot, plug wire, coil module, injector, water in the fuel or anything that interfers with combustion. It can't tell what the 'exact' cause is.
As for injector spray patterns changing over time. It's common knowledge that over time the patterns can change from seat wear, carbon formations on the tips, gum from a leaking injector, acids in the gas that will still flow by a filter, crank case oil intake from the PCV, engine cylinders that stop with the intake valve open exposing the injector to heat before cool down and sometimes reversion flow back out of the cylinder. This is how the under sides of an intake valve can carbon up. It's also part the temp of the parts where a cooler surface can collect these things. Over time, carbon can soak up part of the injector flow and never reach the cylinder.
Mass Air control can account for a lot before it gets to far out of hand but Speed Density engine control cannot account for these things very well because the engine is running on a computer model program that can't account for some things because it has no way to do so..
So bottom line is, in the real world, injectors do go 'south' over time for several reasons. You may never feel it because there is nothing to 'constantly' compair with until they are ether cleaned, fail in some manner or replaced. While this is all going on, the PCM program can in most cases correct for poor operation by up to 20%. This keeps you from feeling the effects until the program can't correct any futher.
The old carbed engines suffered from poor valve seal when aged, become hard starting etc. Notice nobody complains about needing a valve job any more because FI covers it up until they get so bad the power takes dive.
The valve seal lasts so long now because of the precision of fuel injection and the cooling the intake valve gets and the much better condtions the exhaust valves have to live in.
Ahh, computer programs that learn until their limits are reached!