Did Seafoam cause this?
#1
Did Seafoam cause this?
I have a 1994 f150 Scab 4wd with the 351 v8. I found an extra can of Seafoam in the garage today, and decided to run about 1/2 a 8oz. can of Seafoam through my master cylinder vacuum line. I shut it off waited 10 minutes or so, then fired up the engine and let it run. Smoke everywhere. I've done this before with great success on other trucks, outboards, etc; today was different.
Since the seafoam treatment, the truck has developed a rough idle, as if it's not running on all cylinders, and it stumbles a bit off the line. Once up to speed, I don't notice that anything is wrong.
I decided to use a bit more Seafoam, and repeat the process to see if I could fix what I broke, but the problem still exists.
Since I added a little Seafoam to the tanks also, I figured I may have stirred up some crap and plugged the fuel filter so I put in a new one. The problem still occurs. Anybody got an idea about what caused this, and how to fix it?
Since the seafoam treatment, the truck has developed a rough idle, as if it's not running on all cylinders, and it stumbles a bit off the line. Once up to speed, I don't notice that anything is wrong.
I decided to use a bit more Seafoam, and repeat the process to see if I could fix what I broke, but the problem still exists.
Since I added a little Seafoam to the tanks also, I figured I may have stirred up some crap and plugged the fuel filter so I put in a new one. The problem still occurs. Anybody got an idea about what caused this, and how to fix it?
#5
#6
#7
Originally Posted by MGDfan
Fact: No liquid - ANY liquid, compresses AT ALL.
uh... liquids are perfectly compressible, it just requires alot of effort for little gain.
http://www.physlink.com/Education/askExperts/ae15.cfm
therefore, ALL liquids compress... which would, in this case, make Faster150s statement more true than yours.
just the facts ma'am
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by chavez243ca
LOL!
uh... liquids are perfectly compressible, it just requires alot of effort for little gain.
http://www.physlink.com/Education/askExperts/ae15.cfm
therefore, ALL liquids compress... which would, in this case, make Faster150s statement more true than yours.
just the facts ma'am
uh... liquids are perfectly compressible, it just requires alot of effort for little gain.
http://www.physlink.com/Education/askExperts/ae15.cfm
therefore, ALL liquids compress... which would, in this case, make Faster150s statement more true than yours.
just the facts ma'am
#10
Originally Posted by xopis
For all intensive purposes the assumption is liquids are incompressible. Yes they will compress but it takes too much effort to consider them compressible.
If you wish to state that within the confines of an internal combustion engine, liquids do not compress - well, that may be closer to a practical truth, but still a theoretical falsehood.
#11
Originally Posted by chavez243ca
LOL!
uh... liquids are perfectly compressible, it just requires alot of effort for little gain.
http://www.physlink.com/Education/askExperts/ae15.cfm
therefore, ALL liquids compress... which would, in this case, make Faster150s statement more true than yours.
just the facts ma'am
uh... liquids are perfectly compressible, it just requires alot of effort for little gain.
http://www.physlink.com/Education/askExperts/ae15.cfm
therefore, ALL liquids compress... which would, in this case, make Faster150s statement more true than yours.
just the facts ma'am
thx... not all people payed attention in physics about molecular structures of solids liquids and gas's and why they are compressable and why the arent.
#12
Originally Posted by xopis
For all intensive purposes the assumption is liquids are incompressible. Yes they will compress but it takes too much effort to consider them compressible.
really now... how does a pressure washer work... ohh hey!! it compresses washer.. i work with high pressure sewer clean out trucks.. that use 4-8,000PSI of water.. yes u can compress liquids.. if there is a space between the molecules it is compressable.
#13
Originally Posted by chavez243ca
For "all intents and purposes" liquids are compressible, just because something is difficult to do, that does not negate that fact that it is attainable. Even solids are compressible - check some married chick's finger - diamonds are compressed carbon (heat also req'd) - but a diamonds increased density over amorphous carbon indicates that it is indeed compressed.
If you wish to state that within the confines of an internal combustion engine, liquids do not compress - well, that may be closer to a practical truth, but still a theoretical falsehood.
If you wish to state that within the confines of an internal combustion engine, liquids do not compress - well, that may be closer to a practical truth, but still a theoretical falsehood.
on the old fighter jet planes they use to inject water into the engines to incress compression.. now it kinda killed the life of the engine.. but it made them some high compression monsters
#15