Synth Oil Change Interval???
Originally Posted by chester8420
There is one piece of evidence that nobody here can deny. If synthetics were ANY better, then why doesn't Ford recommend them? Because they built the engine to run on dino!
Originally Posted by doctorD
Maybe they do not recommend synthetics because of cost. Maybe because they want you to buy more of their MC oil. And there's really no need to 'recommend' a synthetic when dino oil provides adequate protection. I don't believe they built the motor to run on dino. If that is the case, then why do they come with a synthetic blend from the factory? Mine did. My brothers did.
Let's see...110K on my 99, oil changed every 3K on the dot, 5w3o Castrol GTX. Burns less than 1/2 qt.
170K on my dad's 98 Ranger. Oil changed every 5K +/-, whatever 10w3o is cheapest, swear to the big man above he gets it from the dollar store.
I don't have a high performance car (even though I drive it like that sometimes), and it doesn't require the expensive stuff. I'm sticking with dino.
170K on my dad's 98 Ranger. Oil changed every 5K +/-, whatever 10w3o is cheapest, swear to the big man above he gets it from the dollar store.
I don't have a high performance car (even though I drive it like that sometimes), and it doesn't require the expensive stuff. I'm sticking with dino.
Originally Posted by chester8420
But if the dino provides adequate lubrication, then why exceed it? You're just wasting your money.
This guy up the road from my office owns a CAR KING automotive place. He has a torn down motor that he wanted to rebuild to add some new parts. It ran completely on RP synthetic with the occasional Redline. It appeared brand new even though it had over 200K miles on it. No varnish, not sludge build up.
Adequate to me is ok if you're willing to settle for mediocrity in some cases. Plus I do not mind spending the $6-7/quart of oil.
1979 Dodge Ram Charger 276K miles
1986 Grand Am 265K miles
1999 Grand Am 206K miles
1994 Lincoln Town Car 169K miles
The 2 Ford trucks we had in the early 80's (inherited from late uncles)needed so much work that we got rid of them. Both ran on dino oil and needed work on the motors all the time. My dad got tired of sinking $$ into them. Neither made it over 100K miles. Both were used on our farm.
All of the previous are running on synthetics and never a major repair, and motors still run like new.
I'll stick with synthetics.
Originally Posted by doctorD
tons of varnish and buildup
Originally Posted by doctorD
Both ran on dino oil and needed work on the motors all the time. My dad got tired of sinking $$ into them. Neither made it over 100K miles. Both were used on our farm.
All of the previous are running on synthetics and never a major repair, and motors still run like new.
All of the previous are running on synthetics and never a major repair, and motors still run like new.
I feel as if your problems were un-related to the oil that was being used (unless it ran without oil for a while)..... But you know... not me.
I just wouldn't get too comfortable with the idea that, If I spend more money, and buy a "better" product, my truck will last longer... Truth be told, I rarely see an engine quit because of "oil related" mechanical failure. You'd be surprised at how tough and tolerant your engine is to various lubricants. I've heard of people running out of oil and adding cooking oil, tranny fluid, hydraulic oil, etc. with no ill effects. Remember, "no oil" is what gets people. And that's probably what happened in the case of your uncle's trucks.
Last edited by chester8420; Aug 15, 2006 at 01:08 AM.
Originally Posted by chester8420
Is this really a problem? .... (not meant to be sarcastic or offensive)... I'm just posing the question to the general forum viewers..
Originally Posted by chester8420
What "oil related" problems did you have, that required regular maintenence?


