k&n or e-bay knock off?
$40 Ebay Intake
Well maybe I spoke too soon on the cheapo intake I bought on ebay...just pulled it off to do some routine maintenance and here's what I found:
The intake has been on my truck for a year or so, maybe 10k miles. I have to say though that there have been no codes or engine lights and the truck seems to run normally.
The intake has been on my truck for a year or so, maybe 10k miles. I have to say though that there have been no codes or engine lights and the truck seems to run normally.
Originally Posted by jeffrop
Well maybe I spoke too soon on the cheapo intake I bought on ebay...just pulled it off to do some routine maintenance and here's what I found:
The intake has been on my truck for a year or so, maybe 10k miles. I have to say though that there have been no codes or engine lights and the truck seems to run normally.
The intake has been on my truck for a year or so, maybe 10k miles. I have to say though that there have been no codes or engine lights and the truck seems to run normally.
damn mines holding up find i re oil my every so often with armorall but it doesnt crack. what type of climate are u in. usually salty and freezing temperatures will dry rubber out enough that it will crack
I got one of the 20$ intakes on ebay last month and I would have to say that the clamps and filter are junk. But you can pick up a k&n cone filter for around 45$ and some new clamps for 4 or 5$. The tube seems to be fine but I don't like how they made the pice for the filter to mount to. I gained 1.5 mpg on the hwy. but stayed the same with city driving.
Originally Posted by kstonelb86
ok.. so what does the k&n do from keeping the engine running too rich or too lean?
Welcome to 1988.
Originally Posted by kstonelb86
wow i didnt know that. thanks
No problem. I have been doing some tuning on a (race) car that I have and I have had to learn a lot of this stuff over the last few years. It's all pretty cool stuff. In a lot of cases you will find that certain things you do to a modern fuel injected engine will actually do nothing at all because of this adaptive strategy.
Definitely cool stuff.
Mine was on the nav for about a year and a half before I changed to the blower setup. My rubber connectors still look brand new. But even if they rotted off and I paid another $40 to get a whole nother kit, I'd still be $100+ better off than someone who spent $200+. And all this talk about running rich or lean with a particular brand, thats a load of horse chit. Using an air intake system has never once caused me to kick a code on 15+ vehicles, 13 of which were fords.
Originally Posted by 98Navi
And all this talk about running rich or lean with a particular brand, thats a load of horse chit. Using an air intake system has never once caused me to kick a code on 15+ vehicles, 13 of which were fords.
Agreed. Plug all sensors in and eliminate the airleaks and there shouldn't be any problems.
But, do you guys really think these things do anything besides maybe make a little bit more noise? The STOCK intake is NOT a restriction to a STOCK motor. Replacing engine internals and/or raising the redline is what makes power. Gearing will get you your torque. And how can anybody seriously expect to gain HP AND MPG???
But, do you guys really think these things do anything besides maybe make a little bit more noise?
One thing I have seen on here, and I say this in an informational only manner so I don't need the after effects it has caused elsewhere, that Mr. Troyer claims 30HP at like 3000 RPM with a simple intake. Now I for one don't believe that for a second. I don't even think a car with a blower would benefit 30HP from a simple pipe and filter. But to each his own, so you vehement Troyer defenders need not turn this into a rampage, I'm just quoting MT and saying that I disagree with his point.
Do these really work? Well, there has been documented evidence that it does make a difference.
Just keep in mind that manufacturers don't always design these systems for maximum performance. NVH is one of the key factors. Customers don't like noise that they don't understand. Issues like servicability, appearance and simple manufacturing all play into these designs.
How it comes from the factory isn't always the best way.
Just keep in mind that manufacturers don't always design these systems for maximum performance. NVH is one of the key factors. Customers don't like noise that they don't understand. Issues like servicability, appearance and simple manufacturing all play into these designs.
How it comes from the factory isn't always the best way.
Originally Posted by 98Navi
One thing I have seen on here, and I say this in an informational only manner so I don't need the after effects it has caused elsewhere, that Mr. Troyer claims 30HP at like 3000 RPM with a simple intake. Now I for one don't believe that for a second. I don't even think a car with a blower would benefit 30HP from a simple pipe and filter. But to each his own, so you vehement Troyer defenders need not turn this into a rampage, I'm just quoting MT and saying that I disagree with his point.
Really, these intakes do nothing to make you faster, quicker or more powerful except by cutting the workload by lightening you wallets.
Originally Posted by MaddMartigan
Do these really work? Well, there has been documented evidence that it does make a difference.
Just keep in mind that manufacturers don't always design these systems for maximum performance. NVH is one of the key factors. Customers don't like noise that they don't understand. Issues like servicability, appearance and simple manufacturing all play into these designs.
How it comes from the factory isn't always the best way.
Just keep in mind that manufacturers don't always design these systems for maximum performance. NVH is one of the key factors. Customers don't like noise that they don't understand. Issues like servicability, appearance and simple manufacturing all play into these designs.
How it comes from the factory isn't always the best way.
No, it's definitely not ALWAYS the best way, but for a motor with STOCK internals it is. What is it on the intake that you all think it so restrictive anyway??? I mean come one, the MAF and Throttle body are the biggest suspects here, not the whole tube. The real restriction is on the exhaust side anyways, and I'm not talking about the exhaust pipes or muffler.
EDIT: And as for servicability, well, Ford didn't design these things around that idea, that's for sure!
Last edited by defective; Jan 24, 2006 at 09:18 PM.


