347 Stroker?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 7, 2004 | 11:10 AM
  #1  
BuckShot_37's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Aylett, Va
347 Stroker?

I was curious if I should get a 347 stroker for my 89 F-150? I want something that has power, and I think the one I want is at CREB Engineering. I was really curious if anyone thinks Jegs and Summits street/strip motor with 345 HP is worth the $$, or should I go with CREB who is charging I believe $3300-$3800, with near 400 HP? I plan on doing some more research, but I wanted some opinions from the experts here on the forums.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2004 | 03:43 PM
  #2  
wamsleyb's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Northridge
Any of the motors would be okay, one thing you want to watch for is if the oil ring (the bottom ring on the piston) cuts through where the piston wirst pin is. If so you will slowly burn oil. Newer stroker kits do not have this issue as they have made new pistons. I would ask this question of any of the company's you buy from. I thik Coast high Performance makes one with the piston corrrectly made. One other thing, you will have to convert your speed density intake system over to mass air, otherwise it will never run correctly as speed density does not allow for mods like this over stock. Good luck, and let us know how it goes.

Brian
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2004 | 10:46 PM
  #3  
lees99f150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Susquehanna Valley, pa.
you can always put in a 351w dss have good motors, thats where i,m getting a short block for the stang from 393ci bullet www.dssracing.com
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2004 | 03:01 AM
  #4  
Pickup Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 1
From: Hollywood, CA
Yeah, I also believe that a built 351w is the way to go. They do great mildly tuned, also, and they're very stong and long-lasting.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2004 | 05:15 PM
  #5  
BuckShot_37's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Aylett, Va
Yea, but I don't really like the 351W. I want a stroker motor, but I want to be able to get a little bit of gas mileage, hopefully around 8 MPG. I just think that 347 is more reasonable than getting a 393. *I want a stroker motor too, , so just getting 351W wouldn't please me. Does anyone already have a 347 or 393 stroker motor that could give some opinions / insight?
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2004 | 09:43 AM
  #6  
93_Snake's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
I have heard from several sources that most 347 stroker combos are pretty weak. I have heard of a ton of engine failures out of that type engine. The 331 stroker that several of my Mustang friends have tried seems to be a lot stronger. One has a pretty mild setup making around 375 horsepower to the rear wheels. Just FYI.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2004 | 12:51 PM
  #7  
dirt bike dave's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Well, a 351W is a stroked 302.

I though the 347 was a 302 that was stroked and also bored 0.060" over, but I might be wrong.

IMO, a motor that is marketed as street/strip for car applications might be a little too high rpm oriented for a daily driver truck with its poor weight distribution, leaf spring wind up, etc... Unless it's a race truck, you are going to be spending a lot more time at 2,000 - 3,500 rpm than you will at 5,000+ rpm. If I were buildnig a street performance truck, I would look at power figures from 2,500 - 4,000 rpm and give them more weight than peak hp. JMHO.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2004 | 01:11 PM
  #8  
93_Snake's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
A 351 W is a little more than a stroked 302. The blocks are considerably tougher. They are roughly the same size, but a 351 W will not necessarly fit in all the places a 302 will. A 302 engine has a different firing order than the standard 351 also.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 PM.