ecoboost engine oil - blend or straight synthetic?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 10:18 AM
  #16  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
Originally Posted by Labnerd
I would say the test mules with over 100,000 miles are probably past break in. These engines are beating the oil up pretty bad. I would suggest not running any oil, regardless of basestock, past 5000 miles. There's a lot more to an oil performing function than TBN. I would question the value of any oil regardless of basestock that has sheared from a 5w-30 to a 5w-10. Yer truck, yer money.
What's your source for this info?
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 11:03 AM
  #17  
nards444's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by projetmech
I increased my time between oil changes to every 5 K when the factory went to 7K. With the sticker on this truck at over 48K i think i will go with oil changes at 5K.

I would think the synthetic would do better with the heat and stress caused by the turbos. Granted there is a huge difference in design of recip vs jet engines but turbine engs have always used synthetic. This would be for a variety of reasons bit i believe the biggest benefit is its ability to stand up to high heat and the lubrication properties are greater.
There also is theory that changing oil to much is hard on an engine. Because oil goes through its normal life cycle and when you put it in an engine the engine has to work to break the oil down to how it wants to use it. So if you are constantly using new your constantly breaking it down and working the engine. Im not a buyer or seller of this but its out there. personally anything under 5k you are waisting money, time and the environment.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 12:00 PM
  #18  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,535
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
Originally Posted by Takeda
Sorry Scamsoil Signature is NOT API certified, and will void your Ecoboost warranty!
Got some specific proof of this? According to the Amsoil spec sheet, 5W-30 Signature meets specs.

5W-30 (ASL): API SN (Resource Conserving), SM…; ILSAC GF-5, GF-4…; ACEA A5/B5, A1/B1; Ford WSS-M2C946-A, WSS-M2C929-A; Chrysler MS-6395; GM dexos1™ (supersedes LL-A-025, 6094M and 4718M) Fortified with detergents that exceed dexos1™ sulfated ash specifications.
With what Labnerd has posted, I probably wouldn't use it anyway - it would not be cost-effective because I wouldn't run it past 5k.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 01:07 PM
  #19  
projetmech's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 710
Likes: 4
From: Florida
Originally Posted by nards444
There also is theory that changing oil to much is hard on an engine. Because oil goes through its normal life cycle and when you put it in an engine the engine has to work to break the oil down to how it wants to use it. So if you are constantly using new your constantly breaking it down and working the engine. Im not a buyer or seller of this but its out there. personally anything under 5k you are waisting money, time and the environment.
i dont have anything to back me up and say that you are wrong but i think that oil is at its best when it is changed and slowly degrades. i think if it had to be broken down the chemists would figure out a way to do that. eng manufacturers and oil companies have worked hard to extend the life of oil. they say in extreme conditions to change it more often. there are even those that say frequent changes with cheap oil is better than going a long time.

i used to change mine every 3K when the manufacturer reccomended every 5K. when they upped it to 7K i started every 5K. now that they are at 10k i think i will still continue to do it every 5k.

my original question was, has anyone with some miles on their trucks changed from the factory blend to pure synthetic like mobil 1 and noticed an improvement.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 01:59 PM
  #20  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,535
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
I doubt that you would notice an improvement in fuel economy with any oil in any engine these days. The oils today are not at all like they were years ago and even cheap dino oil is as good or better than synthetics were then. The only exception might be a PAO synthetic such as Amsoil Signature, but even that would probably not be consistently noticeable. The only reason to run a high end synthetic these days is to extend your drain intervals, which is not really a good idea with a EB.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 07:07 PM
  #21  
Takeda's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Durham, NC
Originally Posted by glc
Got some specific proof of this? According to the Amsoil spec sheet, 5W-30 Signature meets specs.



With what Labnerd has posted, I probably wouldn't use it anyway - it would not be cost-effective because I wouldn't run it past 5k.
Sure, here are the Scamsoil products that ARE API certified. 2 diesel and 2 gasoline oil products:










And here are a couple examples of how Scamsoil tries to deceive their customers. These products ARE NOT API certified, but they put it on the
bottle label to make customers think it is:




 

Last edited by Takeda; Feb 2, 2012 at 07:09 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 07:38 PM
  #22  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,535
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
Do you have DOCUMENTED PROOF that using Signature will void an Ecoboost warranty?

It's my understanding that the only reason it's not certified is because they use ZDDP, which is actually a GOOD thing, it just pisses off the EPA.

I know you are just a hater and it's pointless to argue with you.
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 08:50 PM
  #23  
Takeda's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Durham, NC
Originally Posted by glc
Do you have DOCUMENTED PROOF that using Signature will void an Ecoboost warranty?

It's my understanding that the only reason it's not certified is because they use ZDDP, which is actually a GOOD thing, it just pisses off the EPA.

I know you are just a hater and it's pointless to argue with you.
All US auto manufacturers state that an API certified oil be used to keep the warranty valid. There are many more articles like these:

http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story....ar=&aff=sacbee


http://www.edmunds.com/car-care/do-i...urers-oil.html
 

Last edited by Takeda; Feb 2, 2012 at 08:59 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 09:35 PM
  #24  
88racing's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,697
Likes: 14
From: In the fast lane from LA to Tokyo...
Originally Posted by Takeda
All US auto manufacturers state that an API certified oil be used to keep the warranty valid. There are many more articles like these:

http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story....ar=&aff=sacbee


http://www.edmunds.com/car-care/do-i...urers-oil.html
According to one of the links you cited GM uses Dexos and not API......European mfgrs have their own oil formulas and not API.....seems like some are straying away from API
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 10:48 PM
  #25  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
Originally Posted by glc
Do you have DOCUMENTED PROOF that using Signature will void an Ecoboost warranty?

It's my understanding that the only reason it's not certified is because they use ZDDP, which is actually a GOOD thing, it just pisses off the EPA.

I know you are just a hater and it's pointless to argue with you.
I do know the Ford owners manual says to look of the API seal, I saw this last night. It also shows what it looks like and where it normally is on the bottle. Will they void your warranty, I don't know but they do push it in the manual.

With so many good oils on the market that have the rating why take the chance?
 
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2012 | 11:25 PM
  #26  
Labnerd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 42
From: So. Texas
Just a couple of points to keep this thread going in the right direction.
1 Amsoil no longer has all of the ZDDP in the formulation. ZDDP is a multi function additive that kept the Amsoil working for the long distance and keeping the acids at bay. They're now using calcium sulfanates to do the same thing. It's also no longer a PAO only base oil. The base oil more resembles Pennzoil Ultra for a comparison. If you are using it, I strongly suggest that you have it tested at 15,000 miles and pay real close attention to the Oxidation and Nitration levels. Again, there's more to an oil performing function than the TBN.

2 Amsoil Signature series is not API certified and should you have an oil related failure while in warranty, expect Ford to demand an oil report before considering your claim. The OE line is certified but hardly worth any premium.

3 Foreign car makers only spec API oils in the USA. Otherwise they spec ACEA standards for the oils they require. ACEA has a more generous line of additives that are limited in the States. Reason- few emissions standards worldwide like we have in the States. In particular, phosphorus, which when gassed out of formulation will kill the cats rendering them useless. Gassing can occur in an engine that lives in a high humidity environment or an engine that sees short trips and condensate is an issue. It's the gassing of the water molecules that brings the phosphorus out with it. Limits in the States are at 600ppms.

4 Dexos is GM's attempt to to literally blackmail oil producers out of money. There is currently a Federal Investigation as to why GM is demanding tens of thousands of dollars for Dexos certification when other companies like Ford charges less than 100 bucks. Considering the Gov't is the prime shareholder, I doubt the investigation will ever get any where but if you read the owners manual, if Dexos is not available, any API 5w-30 is acceptable. If you read the fine print in GMs advertising, they compare a GF-4 to their specs when the USA is now on GF-5. The standards are ridiculously close, so close that GM really has no reasons to recommend their Dexos standards. Here's a copy of the standards and the gradient lines are 1%. There is a 10% allowance in formulations so an oil that meets their certification may not be compliant but is acceptable.
http://www.gf-5.com/gsuniverse/sitet...20DIAGRAM.html
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2012 | 10:39 AM
  #27  
openclasspro#11's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,824
Likes: 0
From: North Huntingdon,Pa.
snakeoil

I laugh at comments on amsoil.I own my own Hvac co.in all my vans,since new,they have gotten once a year,or 35 oil changes since new,have always used amsoil filters too.used 0w30 until 0w20 was released.I have never had an engine pjroblem.my 04 that I personally drive just cracked 400 k yesterday.the money I do not waste in oil changes and down time goes to killer employee aprreciation parties and bonuses....
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 10:39 AM
  #28  
sam1947's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 2
From: Maine
Originally Posted by glc
Do you have DOCUMENTED PROOF that using Signature will void an Ecoboost warranty?

It's my understanding that the only reason it's not certified is because they use ZDDP, which is actually a GOOD thing, it just pisses off the EPA.

I know you are just a hater and it's pointless to argue with you.
Yea....don't wear your fingers out here, GLC.......it's like trying to reason with a rock
 

Last edited by sam1947; Feb 23, 2012 at 10:51 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 11:37 AM
  #29  
nards444's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by projetmech
i dont have anything to back me up and say that you are wrong but i think that oil is at its best when it is changed and slowly degrades. i think if it had to be broken down the chemists would figure out a way to do that. eng manufacturers and oil companies have worked hard to extend the life of oil. they say in extreme conditions to change it more often. there are even those that say frequent changes with cheap oil is better than going a long time.

i used to change mine every 3K when the manufacturer reccomended every 5K. when they upped it to 7K i started every 5K. now that they are at 10k i think i will still continue to do it every 5k.

my original question was, has anyone with some miles on their trucks changed from the factory blend to pure synthetic like mobil 1 and noticed an improvement.
Im not saying I beleive in my theory just what I have read and seen many beleive in. 3k is way to early on current oils and engines. between 5-7k is perfect. If you want to go less thats on you, but personally I think the manufacture is going to keep it right where it needs to be in order to avoid warranty claims.

I went with Motor Craft Full syn it was only 40 cents more a qt at Wallys. I didnt notice the difference. To be honest with you I have a high performance car and boat and tinkered with oils, and you know what I didnt notice a dang thing as far MPGs, performance gain or not. To me its not worth the headache to worry about weights and brands and such. Use the weight that the manufacture recommends with a good brand.
 
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2012 | 12:55 PM
  #30  
sam1947's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 2
From: Maine
^^^^x2
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 PM.