engine swap V6 for V8

Old Jun 24, 2010 | 07:35 PM
  #31  
BlueOval_Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: Mountain City, North Carolina
Originally Posted by So Cal Ron
well id like my truck to get up to 60 in atleast 5 -7 seconds like a V8
7 seconds isnt asking to much my v6 only has 48k miles on it so its in good condition, I love ford dont get me wrong but Ford was retarded to even think of putting such a tiny engine into such a big truck. My dad used to wn a 5.4l triton v8 on his 99 f150 and even on that truck the engine lagged somewhat. Basically ford really needs to step it up on engine design im not sure about the new engines but the fact there using v6's with twin turbos is really starting to sound like they are getting the hang of it.
but 4.2l engines in a half ton truck? thats just stupid
0-60 in 7 seconds is moving. Eh, my friends 5.3 Chevy is in the low 8's stock.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 07:41 PM
  #32  
Haemon's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks Alaska
Umm... V8 or not, good luck getting your truck 0-60 in 7 seconds without heavily modding.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 07:49 PM
  #33  
BlueOval_Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: Mountain City, North Carolina
I think a SingleCab Shortbed F150 V8 would not have much of a problem really.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 07:53 PM
  #34  
BlueOval_Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: Mountain City, North Carolina
Proofs in the pudding, high 7's to low 8's.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjumTms6gI4
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 12:36 AM
  #35  
ManualF150's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,636
Likes: 264
From: Vernon, NY
I like the 4.7l v8 with 5 speed in my Dak... I wish I could transfer it over to my F150... The NV3500 is a marvelous tranny over the M5OD...
 
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 09:05 PM
  #36  
Haemon's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks Alaska
Hmmm... wow... I wonder why I remember people amazed that they got sub 10's when dragging then, and I'm sure it was an F-150. Then again i'm talking about 97ish.. yours in the new 04 and much lighter.
 

Last edited by Haemon; Jun 25, 2010 at 09:09 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 10:12 PM
  #37  
lilgreenjeep2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, De
If I'm not mistaken, that 4.2 still carries the old small block (5.0/5.8 Liter) bolt pattern on the bellhousing. The 4.6 and 5.4 have the new modular bolt pattern, so you would have to do a transmission swap as well since the bellhousing is not removable.
Of course you could always do a 5.0 or 5.8 swap...I think a 1st generation Lightning motor would be awesome... so long as your state's emmisions would allow such a swap. Ford Motorsports and a few others have a stand-alone electrical system to make it work...probably no possibility of making the stock ECM and wiring work.
Quite frankly (even though I have two F-150s...one with the 4.6 and one with the 5.4) I'm not quite sure what the advantage Ford gained by going to the modular motors was in the first place. The 5.0 and 5.8 are compact, make great power with minimal mods, and still have a strong aftermarket even though the last pushrod small block Fords were produced over a decade ago.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2010 | 03:51 PM
  #38  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,538
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
Not everyone even cares about breaking 10 seconds 0-60. I sure don't. I don't know if mine does or not, never clocked it. If I wanted a 7 second 0-60, I sure wouldn't own a full sized pickup truck.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 01:08 PM
  #39  
48prerunner's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by lilgreenjeep2
If I'm not mistaken, that 4.2 still carries the old small block (5.0/5.8 Liter) bolt pattern on the bellhousing. The 4.6 and 5.4 have the new modular bolt pattern, so you would have to do a transmission swap as well since the bellhousing is not removable.
Of course you could always do a 5.0 or 5.8 swap...I think a 1st generation Lightning motor would be awesome... so long as your state's emmisions would allow such a swap. Ford Motorsports and a few others have a stand-alone electrical system to make it work...probably no possibility of making the stock ECM and wiring work.
Quite frankly (even though I have two F-150s...one with the 4.6 and one with the 5.4) I'm not quite sure what the advantage Ford gained by going to the modular motors was in the first place. The 5.0 and 5.8 are compact, make great power with minimal mods, and still have a strong aftermarket even though the last pushrod small block Fords were produced over a decade ago.
Been looking into a v8 swap and wondering about passing the emissions test I think if i reg for over 8500 lbs i would be emission exempt in ny. so a 01 4x4 short bed weighs about 4500? think they would let me do a 2 ton payload lol.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 02:57 PM
  #40  
BlueOval_Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: Mountain City, North Carolina
Originally Posted by Haemon
Hmmm... wow... I wonder why I remember people amazed that they got sub 10's when dragging then, and I'm sure it was an F-150. Then again i'm talking about 97ish.. yours in the new 04 and much lighter.
I have PI heads and only weighs 4200lbs if that.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 04:09 PM
  #41  
So Cal Ron's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: so cali
Originally Posted by glc
Not everyone even cares about breaking 10 seconds 0-60. I sure don't. I don't know if mine does or not, never clocked it. If I wanted a 7 second 0-60, I sure wouldn't own a full sized pickup truck.
im just sick of how slow this dumbass engine is
im really not sure why ford even designed it for trucks
this engine would be best for a tiny little ford ranger
but not a full sized pick up
v8s are the only engines that should be put in full size pick ups
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 04:22 PM
  #42  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,538
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
You are entitled to your opinion, but there are a lot of satisfied V-6 F-150 owners out there. I still think something is wrong with yours.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 04:24 PM
  #43  
ManualF150's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,636
Likes: 264
From: Vernon, NY
Originally Posted by glc
You are entitled to your opinion, but there are a lot of satisfied V-6 F-150 owners out there. I still think something is wrong with yours.
I'm quite satisfied.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 05:46 PM
  #44  
48prerunner's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
dont know if this is just a misprint but lists motor mounts for a 97 f-150
http://www.am-autoparts.com/AM/Engin...ogle_base_feed
says they fit 87 to 97 would they make the 302 -351 a bolt in then? except for wiring.

just checked does not look like a 97 motor mount oh well
 

Last edited by 48prerunner; Jul 5, 2010 at 05:50 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 06:11 PM
  #45  
BlueOval_Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
From: Mountain City, North Carolina
Originally Posted by glc
You are entitled to your opinion, but there are a lot of satisfied V-6 F-150 owners out there. I still think something is wrong with yours.
I doubt something is wrong with his. A lot of V6 guys say there is not much of a difference between a 4.2 and 4.6, and really its huge.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:32 PM.