SuperCrew

2003 Diesel Supercrew??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2001 | 03:47 PM
  #1  
ScrewBigRed's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: MN
Question 2003 Diesel Supercrew??

So how would a Supercrew diesel with 235 horsepower at 400 foot lbs. torque perform? I would think it would be pretty lethargic or am I wrong?

http://www.blueovalnews.com/

Look for this section:

Exclusive Report Updates:
23 July 01:
• 2003 Ford Expedition Specifications

• 2006 Estimated light truck production

• Ford 4.5L V6 diesel <<<<<

For the 2003 F150, the diesel package will be made optional on all regular, SuperCab and SuperCrew models in either 4X2 or 4X4 drive lines.
 
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2001 | 04:25 PM
  #2  
TroyK's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
hey, thanks for the link! that was an interesting article. i'm not sure that i'd take to the diesel option, but i'm sure others would. the 400 lb/ft of torque actually kicks the current 5.4's **** and would probably get better fuel mileage. might not be a bad alternative to the complex ohc engines...plus, i'll bet ford won't specify 5w20 in the diesel motor?!
 
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2001 | 05:02 PM
  #3  
Screwdriver's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: Louisville
Diesel Torque @ 340lbs.

The article calls for 340 ft lbs of torque, so where's the benefit of the diesel? Better get some great mileage. The 5.4 has 350 on the torque.

There must be a misprint, as the Expedition article lists the 5.4 2V power output instead of an improved 3V head model.
 
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2001 | 07:25 PM
  #4  
TroyK's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
From: South Dakota
hummm, at second look that article is confusing! at the bottom there is a specification for 400 lb/ft or torque but i can't tell if that is the rating for engines that will go into the expedition, or what.
 
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2001 | 07:33 PM
  #5  
ScrewBigRed's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: MN
Revision dates to article

The different numbers are most likely due to the article being revised over time.

ie: Published: 26 July 99
Date of revision: 03 OCt 99, 21 April 00, 23 July 2001.

I believe the torque number of 400 is the more current rating.
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2001 | 11:53 AM
  #6  
firstimeFord's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
If it does have 235hp/400ftlbs, it will probably out run and out pull the current 5.4. Remember, with the diesel, that torque is available at much lower rpms, lending to quick acceleration. My 5.4 3.73 can't keep up with my buddy's 7.3 dually...

If they can get this engine quieter than the 7.3 and offer it at a decent price ($2500 or less), I would definitely consider it. All that power and with it being only a 4.5, I would expect 20 MPG empty and 15-16 towing (I currently get 15 empty, 11 when towing).

Anyone else think this could be a great thing?
 
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2001 | 03:14 PM
  #7  
T-Rex's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, Maryland
I'm Ready to order mine now! I have been wishing that Ford would introduce a smaller diesel suitable for the half ton crowd.

All my buddies with Super-Duty's are always bragging about the gas mileage of the PowerStroke, and then they out-accelerate the 4.6 because of the turbo.
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2001 | 09:47 AM
  #8  
2001's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Canada
Thumbs up Diesel....Cool!

Supercrew with a V6 diesel...what a treat that would be!!

I will be having one on order as soon as they are announced and confirmed foresure!
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2001 | 05:09 PM
  #9  
Mach1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: Spicewood
This is the one we have been waiting for---a diesel in the F150,,yes 400ft lbs torque..this will be a pulling truck and you talk fuel mileage---I am thinking 25-30 mpg....

I already get 20 in the PSD......

It will be quieter--waiting on the camless,,not that is a revolutionary engine and control--you have it all--from the cab if you want fuel mileage, click a switch, if you want power-use another setting, downtown to get emission tested, try another position....

Know that is control and selection---give the people what they want....
 
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2001 | 05:13 PM
  #10  
Mach1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: Spicewood
BTW---watch out for those PSD's ---they are running 700ft lbs torque and 400hp and I know a couple of guys that are in the 14's.....these are the mild manner ones...I have heard of 600hp and 900ft lbs torque and 12's---all this out of a 7000+ lbs truck.

Who could ask for more?????

My wife drives the SCrew and it is the nicest riding truck I have owned....
 
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2001 | 02:27 PM
  #11  
FarmBoy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: New Hudson, MI, USA
I'll be first in line. Been waiting for one for a long time. Plenty of hp and more torque than the 5.4. Should get low 20's for mileage.


-jeff b.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2001 | 10:46 PM
  #12  
guardrail's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Greer SC
there is a picture of the engine in the current Truck Trend.

235HP is what the current PS 7.3 has folks.

Take that engine, add what is sure to be a great Western Diesel Exhaust nd intake systems and you'll be at 300+ and 500 lb ft.

Wouldn't it be great if they offered a longer wheel base and bigger box.
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2001 | 07:50 PM
  #13  
gunsnrods's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Goshen, IN
I drive a VW Jetta Turbo diesel as my everyday car, my Supercrew is my play truck. I'm sold on diesels, if Ford offers a light duty truck with a proven diesel I'm on board....the VW TDI is a great engine in a great package....
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 AM.