2012 F150 5.0 Roushcharger Dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 10-19-2012, 06:53 PM
Ross-FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nice numbers.

What's it sound like?
 
  #17  
Old 10-20-2012, 09:48 AM
fstfrd's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The supercharger is pretty quiet at the current boost level. It is not even close to a stock Lightning's supercharger noise level.
 
  #18  
Old 10-20-2012, 11:54 AM
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Those 5.0s just don't put out any torque. I'm sure ill **** people off saying this but Ford should have left the 5.0 in the stang. It's a great car motor, but just isn't a truck motor. I would have went 3.7, 3.5, and 6.2.

Anyway back on topic, I really want to see a roush blower on more boost with a good tune. JLPs setup is awesome but I want to see what a daily driver (reliable) power level will be
 
  #19  
Old 10-24-2012, 05:25 PM
NOLAGT's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice numbers...yes the roush tune stinks. I finaly got a better one from my installer but havent put it on the rollers yet. I will be getting the 11-12psi pulley shortly and then ill have new numbers. Stock pully for me was 9psi

Few questions

What gear 3rd or 4th

how much timing?
 
  #20  
Old 11-29-2012, 09:56 AM
malexander52's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: spring, texas
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Update plz!

YO
MA'
THE MEATLOAF!

[URL="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSRcXRkQGOI[/URL]

Now, how about some updates? I am dying to FI my 5.0 and you are one of the few that have done it here. Must know more! How do you like driving it? What gears are you currently running?
 
  #21  
Old 11-29-2012, 10:11 AM
DewserB's Avatar
TRUCK OF THE YEAR 2013

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^ LMFAO!! My favorite part of that movie!

Oh, and IRONS1N...I love ya man (no homo) and you certainly know yer stuff, but the 5.0 engine does quite well in the F150. Have ya driven one? INFINITELY better in all aspects that the old 5.4.

OP, daddy likey!!
 

Last edited by DewserB; 11-29-2012 at 10:20 AM.
  #22  
Old 11-29-2012, 11:31 AM
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DewserB
^^ LMFAO!! My favorite part of that movie!

Oh, and IRONS1N...I love ya man (no homo) and you certainly know yer stuff, but the 5.0 engine does quite well in the F150. Have ya driven one? INFINITELY better in all aspects that the old 5.4.

OP, daddy likey!!
I have driven one and I do agree vastly better then the gutless 5.4/4R75 setup. However my only problem with the 5.0 is that it's like the Chevy motors in that they are car motors so peak torque is high in the rpm range. Hell I don't tow much and it'd probably even be a good daily driver for me lol. If I bought a 5.0 it'd be on 13-14psi (mustangs handle it). I'm not trying to **** in anyone's cereal just saying in my opinion the lack of torque sucks.
 

Last edited by IR0NS1N; 11-29-2012 at 02:00 PM.
  #23  
Old 11-29-2012, 11:53 AM
DewserB's Avatar
TRUCK OF THE YEAR 2013

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nobody's cereal got pissed in here.

And I'll agree that it's more "peaky" than the EB. No doubt that the EB delivers more torque more quickly in the RPM range, and it delivers it more evenly. Having said that, I wouldn't describe the torque offering from the 5.0 as a "lack of torque" or even that it "sucks". It just delivers it differently than the TT EB...obviously.

But a car motor? Nah. It's configured for more torque and less hp than the 5.0 in the Mustangs.

Boy, it didn't take long to spoil us Ford fellers. Now we're not happy with 380 ft lbs of torque.

Now, throw boost to the 5.0? Different ballgame altogether!
 
  #24  
Old 11-29-2012, 02:10 PM
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yea they make 380 but I would take the 365 from the 5.4 as from what I've seen comes in lower and maintains for towing. It's peak torque vs strong torque curve which is why I say it lacks torque. Anyway you are right. 380 doesn't even make me happy now lol just spoiled.
 
  #25  
Old 11-29-2012, 03:11 PM
DewserB's Avatar
TRUCK OF THE YEAR 2013

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IR0NS1N
Yea they make 380 but I would take the 365 from the 5.4 as from what I've seen comes in lower and maintains for towing. It's peak torque vs strong torque curve which is why I say it lacks torque. Anyway you are right. 380 doesn't even make me happy now lol just spoiled.
We always want more, more, MORE! I'm right there with ya on that one, bud. No doubt.

That's why I'm hoping Santa will bring me this for Christmas:

http://5startuning.com/onlinestore/e...ne-50l-v8.html

See the dyno graphs. Notice how the torque curve starts higher after these mods and remains more consistent throughout? Even when the stock setup falls off, torque and hp stay strong up to around 6200 RPM.

Even though I'm not complaining about the performance of my 5.0, I'll definitely take an extra 45-55 ft lbs at the 2500-2700 RPM range.

Oh, and sorry fer the thread crap, OP. I'm on a roll today!
 
  #26  
Old 11-29-2012, 05:37 PM
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yea peak stock is a car like 4200ish which sucks. However that boss upgrade looks like a beast! Pretty badass a truck revving that high
 
  #27  
Old 11-29-2012, 06:17 PM
DewserB's Avatar
TRUCK OF THE YEAR 2013

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True. The Boss mod provides another hefty bump (looks like around 50 ft lbs) right at around 2500-2700 RPMs...right where it's more useful.
 
  #28  
Old 11-29-2012, 07:43 PM
IR0NS1N's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 2,565
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Anyway I don't mean to be a **** I understand the 5.0 is a great motor, has mod potential and the cheapest engine for the truck. I'm not trying to say no one should buy it or that it's a mistake for those that did.
 
  #29  
Old 11-29-2012, 09:03 PM
DewserB's Avatar
TRUCK OF THE YEAR 2013

Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh no worries here, bud. I know ya weren't saying that, and it wouldn't bother me if ya did. I love my 5.0, and it serves any purpose I'd ever throw at it.
 
  #30  
Old 12-07-2012, 03:51 PM
F 1Fiddy's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Holt, MO
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After driving my 2010 5.4 for 105000 miles, I agree with irons1n. The torque on that engine is good down low where I need it. I have driven the 5.0 in rental trucks, and it just doesn't have any low end grunt. Sounds great when you stand on it, but I live 98% of my miles between 1500 to 3000 rpm, and the 5.0 just doesn't like those low rpms.
I would think a blower would really help it where it needs it.
I have been very satisfied with the 5.4 in this truck and its pulling power. It seems to be mated well with the 6 speed.
 


Quick Reply: 2012 F150 5.0 Roushcharger Dyno



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 AM.