Turbo Question!!!!!

Old Nov 21, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #1  
itimebomb89's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Sother California
Turbo Question!!!!!

Can anyone tell me what kind of turbo to use on a 2000 5.4 I think they are good to about 6 lbs of boost. I cant seem to find one on the web and a hope that someone knows a turbo that i can use.
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 03:41 PM
  #2  
stoffer's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 13,679
Likes: 84
From: missing Texas...
start by looking here

http://www.got-pressure.com/yabbse/i...p?topic=1958.0
 
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2007 | 08:44 PM
  #3  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
you going to custom fab all the piping?
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 02:06 PM
  #4  
itimebomb89's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Sother California
Ya its what i do. I just don't know what turbo to use. I'm looking at a t-67 s from Garrett.
 
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2007 | 04:10 PM
  #5  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
that will be too small.... go with a t76 atleast
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 01:10 AM
  #6  
itimebomb89's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Sother California
what would i have to do to my engine to support that? I'm only gonna run 10 psi at the most.
 
Reply
Old Nov 24, 2007 | 03:59 PM
  #7  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
10 psi with a turbo will be a lot of power. rods and pistons will be the first thing to go.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Nov 24, 2007 | 06:28 PM
  #8  
Neal's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 7,030
Likes: 3
From: WINDSOR, ONTARIO, CANADA
Cool

HI!... You'll need :

Pistons :



Rods :



Arp studs :



High volume oil pump :

 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 02:11 PM
  #9  
Moltenice's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: WA
Turbo is the way to go.
Turbo > Supercharger any day of the week.


It depends alot on what you are looking for. Larger turbos with bigger compressors take more to spool fully, so you are looking more towards a top end setup, or a smaller turbine with quick spool (which means tire smoke and more pressure on drivertrain)......

But nothing beats the sound of that Turbo whistle, and that open dump at WOT.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 03:20 PM
  #10  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
Originally Posted by Moltenice
Turbo is the way to go.
Turbo > Supercharger any day of the week.
.
Yeah if money is no object. But I have to disagree, I Love instant tire shredding power right off idle
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 06:39 PM
  #11  
justjames80's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Think ya'll are overestimating what the OP wants. The 67mm turbo used in the PTK setup is plenty. Think the .81 A/R turbine housing is recommended too.
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 07:38 PM
  #12  
Moltenice's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: WA
Originally Posted by built54
Yeah if money is no object. But I have to disagree, I Love instant tire shredding power right off idle
You can create that with a smaller turbine.
My last turbocharger had a Tial (titanium aluminide) turbine wheel and spooled to full boost at 3100 rpm, and thats with going WOT at 2900rpm

Turbos blow the doors off Superchargers on top end pull/power
Turbos offer many different trims for your needs,
No parasitic drivetrain loss
Variable boost from inside the cabin at the push of a button (conservative to race)
No pulleys and belts to worry about.

Turbos FTW!
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 10:25 PM
  #13  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
yea i agree, i almost did a turbo instead of my s/c but money was a problem. I would much rather have a turbo setup, but i couldnt be happier with what I have. Much less maintenance
 
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2007 | 11:54 PM
  #14  
justjames80's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by Moltenice
No parasitic drivetrain loss

Wrong. Don't ever play that card with turbochargers. There are pumping losses associated with them and they do take power from the engine to run. It is significantly less than a supercharger but 10 - 15 hp should be expected.
 
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #15  
Moltenice's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: WA
Originally Posted by justjames80
Wrong. Don't ever play that card with turbochargers. There are pumping losses associated with them and they do take power from the engine to run. It is significantly less than a supercharger but 10 - 15 hp should be expected.
Pumping loss?

I am going to have to disagree with you. There is no parasitic loss with the Turbo. Maybe you mean backpressure and not "pumping loss" and with that, the only time you will encounter an issue is if dont know what you are doing and use the wrong turbo for your motor.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 AM.