J l 10's
J l 10's
Ok I posted this in another froum must have been up too late. Anyway has anyone had the oppertunity to run a pair of 10"w0v2 Vs The 10"w1v2 in the spec portion of the web site it says the
10 w1v2 the one way liear excursion is .375 with a mounting depth of 4.34
10w0v2 the one way linear excursion is .45 and the depth is 4.90. I am thinking the depth is lager on this one because of the magnet? rec for sealed box is .65
The box I have will house either one I currently have the 10w1v2. On paper is the 10w0v2 going to give me more noticable bass or should it be so minimal just keep the ones I have. Nothing wrong with the ones I have, they work great. but, depending on the feedback, if it is posative. I may try a pair of the 10w0v2
10 w1v2 the one way liear excursion is .375 with a mounting depth of 4.34
10w0v2 the one way linear excursion is .45 and the depth is 4.90. I am thinking the depth is lager on this one because of the magnet? rec for sealed box is .65
The box I have will house either one I currently have the 10w1v2. On paper is the 10w0v2 going to give me more noticable bass or should it be so minimal just keep the ones I have. Nothing wrong with the ones I have, they work great. but, depending on the feedback, if it is posative. I may try a pair of the 10w0v2
Ok I posted this in another froum must have been up too late. Anyway has anyone had the oppertunity to run a pair of 10"w0v2 Vs The 10"w1v2 in the spec portion of the web site it says the
10 w1v2 the one way liear excursion is .375 with a mounting depth of 4.34
10w0v2 the one way linear excursion is .45 and the depth is 4.90. I am thinking the depth is lager on this one because of the magnet? rec for sealed box is .65
The box I have will house either one I currently have the 10w1v2. On paper is the 10w0v2 going to give me more noticable bass or should it be so minimal just keep the ones I have. Nothing wrong with the ones I have, they work great. but, depending on the feedback, if it is posative. I may try a pair of the 10w0v2
10 w1v2 the one way liear excursion is .375 with a mounting depth of 4.34
10w0v2 the one way linear excursion is .45 and the depth is 4.90. I am thinking the depth is lager on this one because of the magnet? rec for sealed box is .65
The box I have will house either one I currently have the 10w1v2. On paper is the 10w0v2 going to give me more noticable bass or should it be so minimal just keep the ones I have. Nothing wrong with the ones I have, they work great. but, depending on the feedback, if it is posative. I may try a pair of the 10w0v2
But no, I do not think the difference would be worth the money. Try to listen to some if you get a chance.
I dont think it is worth the money, they are pretty similar in output. I switched from the W1 to my Kodas which was more dramatic difference. The w1 has 9mm of throw while the Kodas have XBL^2 motor and 20mm of throw. Much cleaner and certainly louder if I want it to be.
But no, I do not think the difference would be worth the money. Try to listen to some if you get a chance.
But no, I do not think the difference would be worth the money. Try to listen to some if you get a chance.
The Kodas are no longer in production, but were previously made by Adire Audio. I got lucky and found a pair brand new for sale on a forum classifieds, and they sometimes pop up on Ebay and such. But to answer your question yes they work well in smaller sealed or ported enclosures with about 200-400 watts per driver.
Sone of IncriminatorAudio's Flatline models will work well in small sealed applications. Sundown Audio's E8 drivers will also sound fantastic, and you could probably fit 2-4 depending on your space and budget.
Trending Topics
HLB


