2009 - 2014 F-150

Initial dyno results for the 2009!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 11:35 AM
  #31  
Galaxy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,293
Likes: 6
Wee ain't I just the village idiot!! My apologies!! Yes, I indeed went the wrong way with my AFR. Sorry for the comment guys. Disregard my last post except for the last paragraph...how do you tune these?
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 11:46 AM
  #32  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by ASEMechanic
I absolutely died laughing when I read his caption for that picture...



That's funny, right there! I don't care who you are!

So what do you think, Jim? Did I capture the essence of the droning sound, or did I somehow not hit it squarely? It's such a tough thing to describe.
Yes, the drone is much the same as the noise created by the open 4 barrel carbs, but the big difference to me is with the carbs, it was more like music. It only lasted for the limited time you were WOT and it's a beautiful sound. Witk the intake, the drone is at cruising rpms and becomes annoying. I guess they are so much alike because in both cases, it's air being sucked into a small portal.
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 01:23 PM
  #33  
ASEMechanic's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
From: Winder, GA
Okay... one more correction on the Barometric Pressure situation.

After poking around a bit, I did find that the "absolute" barometric pressure 26.65 was not too far out of line. Here is a cool calculator I found that will provide the absolute barometric pressure for a given altitude and temperature.

http://www.digitaldutch.com/atmoscalc/

The only issue I have with the calculator is that the barometric pressure reading from the dyno would indicate that we were closer to 3500 feet, but I'm not taking into account any variance for local atmospheric conditions. I do know that the day I was dynoing the truck was right after the nasty snowfall condition. The sky was clear and I would assume the barometric pressure was rising at that point, even if only a little bit. So I will stand by the original pressure values.

I went back and look at several other dyno plots just for reference and did find that 26.6 was the average pressure for our location... some days were a little higher, some days were a little lower.

Later.
 

Last edited by ASEMechanic; Jan 17, 2009 at 01:37 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 01:56 PM
  #34  
ASEMechanic's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
From: Winder, GA
Originally Posted by Galaxy
Wee ain't I just the village idiot!! My apologies!! Yes, I indeed went the wrong way with my AFR. Sorry for the comment guys. Disregard my last post except for the last paragraph...how do you tune these?
Galaxy,

No worries on the AFR thing. It happens to the best of us!

This was done through actual tuning of the ECM. We took the stock calibration and applied much of the same tuning we would use on the earlier F-150. We are finishing up the firmware and will have the calibrations available on the Evolution and Gryphon platforms in the next couple weeks.

As for the separate ECM/TCM, it's not a big deal at all. The 6.0L diesel has had the same setup for years and we already know how to handle that. In fact, even the 6.4L and later Expeditions use the 2 module setup. I'm not all that familiar with the Dodge setup, but from what I understand this certainly is much easier to deal with.


Now, one comment on the CAI/AFR thing... The reason a CAI will often cause a lean condition is because the shape and/or diameter of the metering or "sample" area of the intake tube is usually quite different from stock. This change will have a significant effect on the way the Mass Airflow (MAF) Sensor calculates the airflow into the engine. The larger the intake tube, the lower the air velocity through the tube, and consequently through the sampling port of the MAF. This results in a lower output from the MAF which the computer interprets as less air mass entering the engine and in turn cause the computer to inject less fuel. You can guess the rest from here. Since removing the snorkel does not change the sampling area of the intake tube, there is no adverse effect on final AFR.

Enjoy.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 04:42 PM
  #35  
blackf-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ASEMechanic
Galaxy,

No worries on the AFR thing. It happens to the best of us!

This was done through actual tuning of the ECM. We took the stock calibration and applied much of the same tuning we would use on the earlier F-150. We are finishing up the firmware and will have the calibrations available on the Evolution and Gryphon platforms in the next couple weeks.

As for the separate ECM/TCM, it's not a big deal at all. The 6.0L diesel has had the same setup for years and we already know how to handle that. In fact, even the 6.4L and later Expeditions use the 2 module setup. I'm not all that familiar with the Dodge setup, but from what I understand this certainly is much easier to deal with.


Now, one comment on the CAI/AFR thing... The reason a CAI will often cause a lean condition is because the shape and/or diameter of the metering or "sample" area of the intake tube is usually quite different from stock. This change will have a significant effect on the way the Mass Airflow (MAF) Sensor calculates the airflow into the engine. The larger the intake tube, the lower the air velocity through the tube, and consequently through the sampling port of the MAF. This results in a lower output from the MAF which the computer interprets as less air mass entering the engine and in turn cause the computer to inject less fuel. You can guess the rest from here. Since removing the snorkel does not change the sampling area of the intake tube, there is no adverse effect on final AFR.

Enjoy.
Very good info now all I have to do is figure out how todo it on my 04 5.4 as I assume I have to get the intake back into the inner fender wll after removing the snorkel?????
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 05:22 PM
  #36  
2004Triton5.4's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by blackf-150
Very good info now all I have to do is figure out how todo it on my 04 5.4 as I assume I have to get the intake back into the inner fender wll after removing the snorkel?????
Just do like I did. I just removed the snorkel and got a jig saw and chopped off the muffler's on the intake. In this pic the muffler's are still on the intake tube but they are gone now though. I noticed a nice power increase with this setup and a k&n drop in filter. My intake air temperature usually run's about the same as the outside temperature unless I get stuck in traffic then it will get hotter than the outside temp.
 

Last edited by 2004Triton5.4; Jan 17, 2009 at 05:31 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 05:35 PM
  #37  
2004Triton5.4's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Bill do you think that it would hurt running the intake with the tube removed from the airbox? I have done this before and gained even more power but was scared about the leaning issue. I don't go offroad and the intake air temperature didn't get very high either. So i'm not really worried about getting water in the intake.
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 10:53 PM
  #38  
ASEMechanic's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
From: Winder, GA
I've run it both ways... With the tube completely removed (like in your picture) and with a piece of PVC tubing to route the airflow back into the fender. The difference in performance was minimal. Just think back to the '70s and '80s when ALL air filter systems had an open orifice under the hood.



This setup never hurt anything and neither will yours.

As a side note, I don't see any reason to cut off the noise filters or "mufflers" as you called them, unless you are looking to clean up the visual aspect of the intake. Keep in mind though that they do serve the purpose of eliminating certain soundwave frequencies relating to dreaded drone.
 

Last edited by ASEMechanic; Jan 17, 2009 at 10:55 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 11:49 PM
  #39  
blackf-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 2004Triton5.4
Just do like I did. I just removed the snorkel and got a jig saw and chopped off the muffler's on the intake. In this pic the muffler's are still on the intake tube but they are gone now though. I noticed a nice power increase with this setup and a k&n drop in filter. My intake air temperature usually run's about the same as the outside temperature unless I get stuck in traffic then it will get hotter than the outside temp.
Thanx much for the help I see how u did it now, one question how do u know what your intake air temp is???
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2009 | 04:21 AM
  #40  
2004Triton5.4's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by blackf-150
Thanx much for the help I see how u did it now, one question how do u know what your intake air temp is???
I have an edge programmer installed in my truck.
 

Last edited by 2004Triton5.4; Jan 18, 2009 at 04:25 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2009 | 04:24 AM
  #41  
2004Triton5.4's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
As a side note, I don't see any reason to cut off the noise filters or "mufflers" as you called them, unless you are looking to clean up the visual aspect of the intake. Keep in mind though that they do serve the purpose of eliminating certain soundwave frequencies relating to dreaded drone.[/QUOTE]

Thanks for the info Bill! I cut the noise filter's off to clean up the underhood appearance. So far I haven't noticed any droning.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2009 | 01:30 PM
  #42  
ASEMechanic's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
From: Winder, GA
Originally Posted by 2004Triton5.4
Thanks for the info Bill! I cut the noise filter's off to clean up the underhood appearance. So far I haven't noticed any droning.
Awesome! That's good to know. It's funny because certain CAI kits don't exhibit droning and some are absolutely miserable. I guess the stock tube is configured in such a way that it doesn't amplify those resonant frequencies.

Take care.
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2009 | 06:57 PM
  #43  
blackf-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 2004Triton5.4
I have an edge programmer installed in my truck.
That is what I was guessing, do u change the tunes or do u mostly use it for guages and how doesit work for u I would like to get one just for the extra guages but couldn't find anybody that had one do the guages work pretty good and can u get tranny temp on the edge???
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 01:53 AM
  #44  
2004Triton5.4's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by blackf-150
That is what I was guessing, do u change the tunes or do u mostly use it for guages and how doesit work for u I would like to get one just for the extra guages but couldn't find anybody that had one do the guages work pretty good and can u get tranny temp on the edge???
So far i've been happy with my edge. I had a Hypertech installed before the edge and it's a night and day difference between the two with the power gained with the edge. The guages work great and yes their is a monitor for the tranny temp. I would just get a gryphon instead it's the same as an edge just recased and the tune's are adjusted for the mod's on your truck. I'll be getting mine gryphonized when I get some extra money to spend. Babies cost alot!LOL
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 04:04 AM
  #45  
ASEMechanic's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
From: Winder, GA
Originally Posted by 2004Triton5.4
Babies cost alot!LOL
Nah... babies are cheap. It's the diapers, formula, clothes, toys, doctor visits, assorted medicines, daycare, and baby sitters that are expensive.

Figure the average delivery costs $8000.00 without insurance (including prenatal) or if you have insurance then it's around $2500.00. Daycare alone for the first year could run a minimum of $3000.00. Add another $1000.00 for diapers and another $1000.00 for formula for the first year. $2000.00 on clothes (those stupid little outfits are EXPENSIVE!) and another $1000.00 for doctors visits.

Assuming no major illness, you've got a minimum of $8000.00... Just for the FIRST YEAR! By the time they're 4, you'll have spent over $27,500.00 (decreasing diaper, formula, doctor and clothing expenses as the child grows) and again that's not accounting for any medical problems.

The funny thing is all that pales in comparison to the cost of education. If you plan to send your kid to college (and paying for it) then you may as well plan on paying about as much as you paid for your house.

Makes you wonder why anyone has kids... It must be love, because nothing else makes sense!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 PM.