Forums are so slow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 11:21 AM
  #16  
webmaster's Avatar
F150online
Founder
Joined: Nov 1996
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 0
From: Roswell, GA USA
Thus, putting a sig in each reply really makes no speed impact on the user.
Caching is a very complicated issue. In the ideal world, the image would be cached in the browser and only loaded once, upon the first request. However, our forums specifically use "no-cache" headers to ensure that the latest version of the page is always loaded. If the sig image is hosted on an outside server and the image is requested in three posts, it is conceivable that your client does have to request that image file three times. This type of performance analysis and tuning is out of our control.
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 11:22 AM
  #17  
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally posted by webmaster
When you "view source" of a webpage, what you are seeing is the HTML that is ultimately rendered for the client (i.e. the web browser) to layout the page. It is always going to look like standard HTML (or Javascript, XML, etc) once it gets to the browser itself regardless of the server or programming language it originated from...
Exactly!! When my browser gets the code, it begins to load the page from all servers... but I'm trying to say my browser isn't even getting the code... the site 'hangs', then pushes down the html & other data to me in a huge rush. Thus, the percieved server issue.
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 11:24 AM
  #18  
webmaster's Avatar
F150online
Founder
Joined: Nov 1996
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 0
From: Roswell, GA USA
See my post above (last one on page 1 for me) for a potential explaination of the partial HTML rendering...^^^
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 11:26 AM
  #19  
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally posted by webmaster
Caching is a very complicated issue. In the ideal world, the image would be cached in the browser and only loaded once, upon the first request. However, our forums specifically use "no-cache" headers to ensure that the latest version of the page is always loaded. If the sig image is hosted on an outside server and the image is requested in three posts, it is conceivable that your client does have to request that image file three times. This type of performance analysis and tuning is out of our control.
Very true. I oversimplified the concept. I host my sig off-site, so the individuals browser should only be getting it once... I assume everyone else does the same... opps!
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 11:32 AM
  #20  
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
See my post above (last one on page 1 for me) for a potential explaination of the partial HTML rendering...^^^
Very intersting stuff. Thanks for the info and reading all my babbling.
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 11:48 AM
  #21  
lifeguardjoe's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,363
Likes: 0
From: Titusville, FL
Originally posted by dzervit
<snip>

Now, Joe blow could have a mear 5 hops <snip>
Wrong, I go through 18.

 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2004 | 02:48 PM
  #22  
JeffsLightning's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Good info sorry for the large sig..
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2004 | 08:12 PM
  #23  
PhillipSVT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,144
Likes: 0
thanks for the IP address Joe.





 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2004 | 09:40 PM
  #24  
dzervit's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,424
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally posted by PhillipSVT
thanks for the IP address Joe.





I was thinking thte same thing. Plus, those Road Runner addresses don't cycle that often.. heh heh heh..
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 AM.