Forums are so slow
Thus, putting a sig in each reply really makes no speed impact on the user.
Originally posted by webmaster
When you "view source" of a webpage, what you are seeing is the HTML that is ultimately rendered for the client (i.e. the web browser) to layout the page. It is always going to look like standard HTML (or Javascript, XML, etc) once it gets to the browser itself regardless of the server or programming language it originated from...
When you "view source" of a webpage, what you are seeing is the HTML that is ultimately rendered for the client (i.e. the web browser) to layout the page. It is always going to look like standard HTML (or Javascript, XML, etc) once it gets to the browser itself regardless of the server or programming language it originated from...
Originally posted by webmaster
Caching is a very complicated issue. In the ideal world, the image would be cached in the browser and only loaded once, upon the first request. However, our forums specifically use "no-cache" headers to ensure that the latest version of the page is always loaded. If the sig image is hosted on an outside server and the image is requested in three posts, it is conceivable that your client does have to request that image file three times. This type of performance analysis and tuning is out of our control.
Caching is a very complicated issue. In the ideal world, the image would be cached in the browser and only loaded once, upon the first request. However, our forums specifically use "no-cache" headers to ensure that the latest version of the page is always loaded. If the sig image is hosted on an outside server and the image is requested in three posts, it is conceivable that your client does have to request that image file three times. This type of performance analysis and tuning is out of our control.


