lifting an 80-96 alignment???
#32
#34
I don't see what's so hard to understand, the arms are only so long, when you get bigger coils\spacers\whatever its obviously going to push the truck farther away. Since the arms are only so long, it's going to pull the bottom inward, let alone what the radius arms do. Think of it like a triangle, the hypotenuse is the arm, the adjacent is from the far end of the arm to the top of the spring, and the opposite is the spring itself. When the opposite side (spring) gets bigger, every angle of the triangle changes (IE screws the alignment). Thats how I look at it, again, not even including the radius arms.
Last edited by booba5185; 10-22-2010 at 02:53 AM.
#35
I don't see what's so hard to understand, the arms are only so long, when you get bigger coils\spacers\whatever its obviously going to push the truck farther away. Since the arms are only so long, it's going to pull the bottom inward, let alone what the radius arms do. Think of it like a triangle, the hypotenuse is the arm, the adjacent is from the far end of the arm to the top of the spring, and the opposite is the spring itself. When the opposite side (spring) gets bigger, every angle of the triangle changes (IE screws the alignment). Thats how I look at it, again, not even including the radius arms.
If any more reassurance is needed, I would point anyone to www.fullsizebronco.com and tell them to look around. Many more people with TTB trucks who have every setup under the sun.
#36
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Memphis, TN 38135, USA, Earth
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
My statements are based on my education & experience; yours are different. That doesn't make either of us liars, or prove either of us wrong. You say what you think - I'll say what I think.
Those diagrams are OVERsimplified, to the point of being extremely misleading about the geometry of the TIB/TTB. You can't understand what it does by looking at it from the front or the side since neither gives a relevant view of its motion. It's like trying to understand a system of helical gears by diagramming them from a random offset angle. You have to consider ONE side of the suspension from a view perpendicular to its axis of rotation, and that's NOT straight to either side, front or rear, top or bottom. The axis runs between the center of the radius arm bracket's hole (where the arm passes thru) & the center of the axle pivot bushing (midway between the frame holes). That's a significant angle from the side, so a side view won't clarify anything. Same for a front view. So the triangle to think about is the one with that axis as its rear edge, then its other 2 sides going from those points and meeting on the line between the ball joints at the spindle's axis (center of the U-joint for TTBs).
Once you have that triangle in your head, imagine the outboard corner (U-joint) moving up & down in 3D. It doesn't move straight up & down, and it doesn't move in an arc from the side view, or from a front view. When it moves up or down, it ALSO moves inboard & rearward.
Now imagine the one on the other side at the same time - it's like putting 2 LARGE overlapping dogears on a playing card (except you can't actually overlap them, so even that analog has problems) and then flapping them up & down (moving 3D).
Now, imagine how the inverted-Y steering linkage forward of the whole system interacts with both of the pivoting, angled steering knuckles - it gets REALLY complicated REALLY fast, and nothing in those diagrams accurately depicts any of it. (Caster isn't shown the right direction, or even spelled right; camber isn't shown right either, but that's just an aside.) And it doesn't even address scrub radius, Ackerman angle, or any of the other MYRIAD angles that affect TIB/TTB alignment, handling, steering response, & tire wear.
Of course, most alignment techs don't address those other angles either, because they can't be corrected, or because the guy is too lazy/underpaid to worry about them. I've worked with techs who only set toe on these axles, test-drive & adjust until the truck tracks straight, and then give it back to the customer, who rarely knows enough to perceive that it's still not truely aligned.
So it doesn't surprise me a bit that there are hundreds or thousands of TIB/TTB owners who mess with their suspensions and then feel like everything's great. Because it takes an EXPENSIVE alignment machine to read these angles in real-time so they can be checked/corrected. Can you learn to drive a truck with wonky alignment? Sure. Can you wheel it? Of course. Can you get a lot of miles out of the tires? Yes, if you rotate them frequently. Is that good enough for some people? Obviously so, and if you're one of them; fine - it's your truck. Does that mean it's a good idea that should be recommended to new owners? I don't think so, and I don't do it. I recommend getting a real engineered lift system that preserves those angles and makes the truck work the way it was designed to. It's safer for everyone, and cheaper for the owner in the long run.
Those diagrams are OVERsimplified, to the point of being extremely misleading about the geometry of the TIB/TTB. You can't understand what it does by looking at it from the front or the side since neither gives a relevant view of its motion. It's like trying to understand a system of helical gears by diagramming them from a random offset angle. You have to consider ONE side of the suspension from a view perpendicular to its axis of rotation, and that's NOT straight to either side, front or rear, top or bottom. The axis runs between the center of the radius arm bracket's hole (where the arm passes thru) & the center of the axle pivot bushing (midway between the frame holes). That's a significant angle from the side, so a side view won't clarify anything. Same for a front view. So the triangle to think about is the one with that axis as its rear edge, then its other 2 sides going from those points and meeting on the line between the ball joints at the spindle's axis (center of the U-joint for TTBs).
Once you have that triangle in your head, imagine the outboard corner (U-joint) moving up & down in 3D. It doesn't move straight up & down, and it doesn't move in an arc from the side view, or from a front view. When it moves up or down, it ALSO moves inboard & rearward.
Now imagine the one on the other side at the same time - it's like putting 2 LARGE overlapping dogears on a playing card (except you can't actually overlap them, so even that analog has problems) and then flapping them up & down (moving 3D).
Now, imagine how the inverted-Y steering linkage forward of the whole system interacts with both of the pivoting, angled steering knuckles - it gets REALLY complicated REALLY fast, and nothing in those diagrams accurately depicts any of it. (Caster isn't shown the right direction, or even spelled right; camber isn't shown right either, but that's just an aside.) And it doesn't even address scrub radius, Ackerman angle, or any of the other MYRIAD angles that affect TIB/TTB alignment, handling, steering response, & tire wear.
Of course, most alignment techs don't address those other angles either, because they can't be corrected, or because the guy is too lazy/underpaid to worry about them. I've worked with techs who only set toe on these axles, test-drive & adjust until the truck tracks straight, and then give it back to the customer, who rarely knows enough to perceive that it's still not truely aligned.
So it doesn't surprise me a bit that there are hundreds or thousands of TIB/TTB owners who mess with their suspensions and then feel like everything's great. Because it takes an EXPENSIVE alignment machine to read these angles in real-time so they can be checked/corrected. Can you learn to drive a truck with wonky alignment? Sure. Can you wheel it? Of course. Can you get a lot of miles out of the tires? Yes, if you rotate them frequently. Is that good enough for some people? Obviously so, and if you're one of them; fine - it's your truck. Does that mean it's a good idea that should be recommended to new owners? I don't think so, and I don't do it. I recommend getting a real engineered lift system that preserves those angles and makes the truck work the way it was designed to. It's safer for everyone, and cheaper for the owner in the long run.
#38
Steve, not to uh threadjack myself or take away from your little 'duscussion'
but could you possibly tell me where i can get through the firewall at? I need to run a like 8g wire for an amp up to the battery. I'm at a loss for finding a hole to stick it in..hahahaha
but could you possibly tell me where i can get through the firewall at? I need to run a like 8g wire for an amp up to the battery. I'm at a loss for finding a hole to stick it in..hahahaha
Last edited by russo2; 10-22-2010 at 05:11 PM.
#39
#41
#44